If you want to pretend to do science, at least use the terms accordingly.
Things like this
that's why I named my results as a theory ( not a scientific theory, but in the Greek sense of the word, who coined the word)
makes people very suspicious here.
It happens that I looked to the whole thinks we know today about this universe and I found that light waves is the unique thing that fits as the initial spark of this formula, and then, I noticed that if I put the electromagnetic spectrum upon the formula it fits very well, each point of the radioactive flow is in correspondence with each point of the circuity flow in the formula.
I think it's time you give us something to evaluate. Your "formula" would be a good start. No more long words salad posts please. My guess is that you'll quickly loose people's interest in your topic if you continue like this.
SLOW DOWN! You're not even keeping track of who said what!
Take a break, recollect your ideas in a structured manner and start with the beginning here. Start with a simple example and how your hypothesis works better at explaining things than science we know of. You're probably unaware but you're not making a lot of sense right now and it's not because your ideas are way over our heads.
I did not science in the way that human species at 21 century understand it, which is very different from the way that Orionnesis from Orion, Nebula, understand Science and apply different methods. You need understand that each kind of intelligence would have different kind of science, because different brains, different sensors and different methods. For instance, ants can not understand any kind of natural phenomena if not from the optics that contains knowledge of magnetic fields, because ants have antenna. If they develops a science, the rules of science does not change, but at the beginning their scientific knowledge and methods would stands far away off the beam from the human scientific viewpoint.
Are you saying that you're on another level of intelligence?