|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Free will vs Omniscience | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 420 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Well, since we do not seem to be able to create a moral system all humans of any given era will agree with and adopt I'm not sure how God could even have a "Moral system" that we would recognize.
Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17827 Joined: Member Rating: 2.3
|
quote: My view is probably not quite the same as the one you are arguing against, but this is how I see it. For your decision to knowable it must be fixed, inevitable before you even exist. It would seem that it is fixed by the creation of the universe, and therefore an inevitable consequence of the creation of that universe. If that it is true then God must know that IF he creates THAT universe then you will necessarily choose the left path. Therefore God has knowingly dictated that you will choose the left path. I'm personally not interested in what that means for free will (because I don't think that it means anything for that) but it does mean that God has responsibility for your decisions - and everyone's. Adam's (if there was such a person) Herod's, Hitler's...
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NoNukes Inactive Member
|
My view is probably not quite the same as the one you are arguing against, but this is how I see it. For your decision to knowable it must be fixed, inevitable before you even exist. Why must it be inevitable before you exist? Why must the decision be inevitable prior to the time when the future prediction is made? And what if the prediction is made only by examining the person in question and the rest of the universe at some time after you exist? I am suggesting that your logic assumes some particulars that are not necessarily true. Edited by NoNukes, : No reason given. Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also in prison. Thoreau: Civil Disobedience (1846) History will have to record that the greatest tragedy of this period of social transition was not the strident clamor of the bad people, but the appalling silence of the good people. Martin Luther King If there are no stupid questions, then what kind of questions do stupid people ask? Do they get smart just in time to ask questions? Scott Adams
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17827 Joined: Member Rating: 2.3 |
quote: To be knowable it must be inevitable. And unless you are proposing limits to God's foreknowledge, it must be inevitable before you exist.
quote: Unless the prediction MAKES it inevitable, how could it be otherwise ? And how could the prediction make it inevitable ?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18338 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.0 |
PaulK writes: All I see is that God is inevitable. God is past. God is present..(today...right now.) God is future(in that He always will be...at each present moment that I live.) To be knowable it must be inevitable. And unless you are proposing limits to God's foreknowledge, it must be inevitable before you exist. If God knows something, He knows it whenever He so chooses to know it. We cannot say that God must by necessity always know BEFORE we choose. We can but say that what we choose is known. Why? Because God knows us. Personally I believe that God chooses to know only as we choose. It is His gift to us and it is our responsibility. He allows us to freely create our own destiny...in communion with Him. With God, there is no before nor after. There only is communion. Look again at my verses from Revelation. God was. God Is. God will forever be. The Beast(a symbol of rebellion) Once was.(as Lucifer the angel, perhaps.) Now is not. And yet is for those whose names are not in the book of life. They chose their destiny. Their destiny may be said to be Gods responsibility since He initially created evil...but I believe God only created the possibility of evil.... Fallen angels actualized the possibility and humans choose the eventuality...or not. Edited by Phat, : No reason given.Chance as a real force is a myth. It has no basis in reality and no place in scientific inquiry. For science and philosophy to continue to advance in knowledge, chance must be demythologized once and for all. —RC Sproul "A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." —Mark Twain
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17827 Joined: Member Rating: 2.3 |
quote: It's the ability to know, not the fact of knowledge which is the issue. What we will do is only knowable if it is inevitable. So if God could choose to know at any point in time, what we will do must be inevitable at every point in time.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NoNukes Inactive Member
|
To be knowable it must be inevitable. And unless you are proposing limits to God's foreknowledge, it must be inevitable before you exist. Limits of God's foreknowledge is one possibility. It is also possible that God's foreknowledge of an event is obtained by God's direct intervention to remove other possibilities. Or maybe God has the ability to invoke foreknowledge or to not bother with it at his whim. Or maybe God only cares about large overall patterns and does not sweat the small stuff unless it becomes of interest. Or maybe God works like a giant calculator and calculates the outcome of events based on looking at their current states. Some of those possibilities do not require that God have foreknowledge of all events at every instant. There might not be any ways for human's to distinguish or recognize how God does what he does. You have one model and your model requires that God know everything at all instants. But perhaps God abstains from operating in exactly that way because the result is that free will can never exist. ABE: Since you and I have had this discussion before, I thought I would add a thought experiment for your consideration. Let's add God to the Schrodinger's Cat experiment. You put the cat, the poison, radioactive sample, the Geiger counter, etc. in the trunk. Before you open the trunk, God tells you that the cat is dead. Does that mean that there actually is some mechanism for making a particular atom decay? Does the prediction require that some particular atom did decay? Not necessarily. I maintain that it is still possible that atomic decay is non deterministic despite God's ability to know what happened. Now how did God manage accomplish his feet? He might have done it by triggering an atomic decay, or by looking one hour into the future, or by simply by releasing the poison in the vial. God might have examined all of the atoms and been able to tell from inspection that one would decay. One could argue that one or the other of the methods require that atomic decay is determinisitic, but even in that case there is no reason that atomic decay of any group of atoms in general must be deterministic until or unless God examines it. God may be changing the nature of the universe at the time he uses his foreknowledge. Edited by NoNukes, : No reason given. Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also in prison. Thoreau: Civil Disobedience (1846) History will have to record that the greatest tragedy of this period of social transition was not the strident clamor of the bad people, but the appalling silence of the good people. Martin Luther King If there are no stupid questions, then what kind of questions do stupid people ask? Do they get smart just in time to ask questions? Scott Adams
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18338 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.0 |
OK I see your point. One question, though. If God knows AFTER we make our decisions, does this not mean that He would also know BEFORE? The only inevitability is God Himself.
Chance as a real force is a myth. It has no basis in reality and no place in scientific inquiry. For science and philosophy to continue to advance in knowledge, chance must be demythologized once and for all. —RC Sproul "A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." —Mark Twain
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17827 Joined: Member Rating: 2.3 |
quote: It seems to be the only one that works for you.
quote: That would be limited foreknowledge AND dictating the outcome in a way that more obviously interferes with free will.
quote: But even potential foreknowledge is a problem so this doesn't help much
quote: Again, inevitability is a prerequisite for foreknowledge.
quote: Which doesn't help if you assume determinism, and limits foreknowledge if you assume (relevant) indeterminism.
quote: Not at all. I don't for instance, make ANY assumptions about how foreknowledge is possible or bother with any particular view of free will. Now I grant that I assume that God does know the consequences of the act of creation, but refusing to consider the consequences of your actions is not sufficient to absolve anyone of responsibility. So even that assumption is dispensible.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NoNukes Inactive Member |
Now I grant that I assume that God does know the consequences of the act of creation, but refusing to consider the consequences of your actions is not sufficient to absolve anyone of responsibility. I am going to describe one possible viewpoint. I submit that it is a view under which your suppositions are incorrect. The creation of a universe that includes the possibility of free will inevitably involves good and bad events. And with respect to the tiny part of the creation that is earth, very often man himself is the author of his own misfortune, other times accident and misfortune befall us. But overall, creation is a positive thing. The only alternative is non creation. Do such limitations mean that the creator is not really omnipotent? Well, given that none of us can conceive of a way to create any kind of universe with living beings in it at all, I think that's a rather silly question. If some of us starve on a world that can feed everyone, is that somehow God's fault? Is it God's fault that our sun is only going to last a few billion years? I don't see any of those things as something with which to find fault with God. I understand that such an understanding is incompatible with some expectations of omniscience and omnipotence. But quite frankly I think the understanding lots of people have about those things are kind of comic booky. What's more, I'm pretty sure that you yourself don't actually possess those beliefs. Instead you are extending what you believe must be the conclusions of people who do believe in an omnipotent God who cares about them in particular. Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also in prison. Thoreau: Civil Disobedience (1846) History will have to record that the greatest tragedy of this period of social transition was not the strident clamor of the bad people, but the appalling silence of the good people. Martin Luther King If there are no stupid questions, then what kind of questions do stupid people ask? Do they get smart just in time to ask questions? Scott Adams
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NoNukes Inactive Member |
Again, inevitability is a prerequisite for foreknowledge. You are not making an argument for this statement. You are instead simply asserting it and then using as a response my arguments. It is, imo, at least possible that God's process of predicting forces determination. Since you responded to my post I added by edit a thought experiment. Could I get your comments on that experiment? Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also in prison. Thoreau: Civil Disobedience (1846) History will have to record that the greatest tragedy of this period of social transition was not the strident clamor of the bad people, but the appalling silence of the good people. Martin Luther King If there are no stupid questions, then what kind of questions do stupid people ask? Do they get smart just in time to ask questions? Scott Adams
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17827 Joined: Member Rating: 2.3 |
quote: quote: I would say that that is only a practical certainty, not a logical certainty. And omnipotence is only limited by logical certainty. Worse, you have not established that the only choice God has is to create this universe or create nothing. That would be quite a big restriction - but you need to rule out the possibility that God could make anything better tan our universe for your argument to work at all. And even then you will not have adequately answered my argument because the alternatives open to God at creation are not a part of it.
quote: Omnipotence doesn't mean only "really, really powerful". Omnipotence is power limited only by the absolute impossibilities of logic. So, if you are alleging that God has limitations beyond that you are indeed suggesting that God is less than omnipotent. So, skip the waffle and just admit that you are proposing a God that is less than omnipotent.
quote: And you are wrong again. I am pointing out what I believe are the consequences of certain beliefs. I am taking a serious philosophical view, not a "comic-booky" one. I don't assume that the average believer has worked out the consequences of their beliefs or even really thought about the issues. Finally I'll point out that I haven't invoked omnipotence. Granted it makes my position much stronger but I only rely on God being able to have perfect knowledge of the future (and that only within our universe) and God creating our universe. So we come back to your initial assertion:
I am going to describe one possible viewpoint. I submit that it is a view under which your suppositions are incorrect.
And we have seen that that is false since you have failed to address my suppositions at all. Edited by PaulK, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17827 Joined: Member Rating: 2.3 |
quote: I don't need to since it is necessarily true. You cannot have certain knowledge of a thing that is inherently uncertain.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17827 Joined: Member Rating: 2.3 |
quote: Only if you make assumptions about God which erase the difference between knowledge before the fact and after it.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17827 Joined: Member Rating: 2.3 |
quote: Since God has stated that the cat *is* dead this is not an example of foreknowledge. God could have worked that out simply be observing that the cat was dead. Even if you turn it into a prediction it doesn't matter. All your methods either assume that the cat will inevitably die (agreeing with my argument) or that God deliberately arranges it (which is even worse for you). Even the suggestions that God is unable to tell which atom will decay is irrelevant. So no, nothing there of any value to the discussion.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024