Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,488 Year: 3,745/9,624 Month: 616/974 Week: 229/276 Day: 5/64 Hour: 0/0


EvC Forum ⇒ Side Orders ⇒ Coffee House ⇒

Hate Crimes? Thought Crimes? Crimethink?

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Hate Crimes? Thought Crimes? Crimethink?
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005

Normal Thread Display

(1)
Message 8 of 131 (763256)
07-23-2015 7:38 AM 		Reply to: Message 4 by Jon
07-23-2015 12:35 AM

Did Roof intend to kill people?
​
Yes: so we can call it murder.
​
Did Roof intend to kill black people because they were black?
​
Yes: so we can call the murder a hate crime.
​
Seems simple enough.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
​
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
​
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by Jon, posted 07-23-2015 12:35 AM Jon has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 10 by Jon, posted 07-23-2015 8:00 AM Larni has replied
 Message 63 by Hyroglyphx, posted 01-01-2016 5:09 AM Larni has not replied
  
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005

Normal Thread Display

(1)
Message 44 of 131 (763359)
07-23-2015 9:18 PM 		Reply to: Message 10 by Jon
07-23-2015 8:00 AM

Well in that case, no.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
​
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
​
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by Jon, posted 07-23-2015 8:00 AM Jon has not replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 45 by NoNukes, posted 07-23-2015 9:34 PM Larni has replied
  
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005

Normal Thread Display

(1)
Message 48 of 131 (763375)
07-24-2015 4:43 AM 		Reply to: Message 45 by NoNukes
07-23-2015 9:34 PM

A perfect 10?
​
I've been a good boy with a good heart.
​
But in reality: I posted when my boy William was born (he's 12 weeks old, now) and (Just like Christmas during World War One) every one came together to bring him gifts of up votes and good wishes.
​
I'm not comparing William to Jesus: that's for other people to decide.
​
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
​
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
​
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
This message is a reply to:
 Message 45 by NoNukes, posted 07-23-2015 9:34 PM NoNukes has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 49 by AZPaul3, posted 07-24-2015 7:59 AM Larni has not replied
 Message 53 by NoNukes, posted 07-24-2015 7:21 PM Larni has not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024