Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,426 Year: 3,683/9,624 Month: 554/974 Week: 167/276 Day: 7/34 Hour: 1/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Immanuel Kant
joz
Inactive Member


Message 2 of 46 (7315)
03-19-2002 12:58 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Punisher
03-19-2002 12:29 PM


quote:
Originally posted by Punisher:
..I've read only excerpts thus far.
Found the full text here....
http://www.hkbu.edu.hk/~ppp/cpr/toc.html
Give me a while to read it and I`ll get back to you....

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Punisher, posted 03-19-2002 12:29 PM Punisher has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 44 by Brad McFall, posted 08-07-2002 2:58 PM joz has not replied

  
joz
Inactive Member


Message 4 of 46 (7326)
03-19-2002 4:35 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by Mister Pamboli
03-19-2002 4:27 PM


quote:
Originally posted by Mister Pamboli:
But he rejected that any influence of a designing God could be seen in this because it was not objectively defensible. "No synthetical proposition can be made with
reference to what is beyond sensory perception."

Sounds like a logical positivist there....

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by Mister Pamboli, posted 03-19-2002 4:27 PM Mister Pamboli has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 6 by Mister Pamboli, posted 03-19-2002 4:56 PM joz has replied

  
joz
Inactive Member


Message 8 of 46 (7456)
03-20-2002 11:40 PM
Reply to: Message 6 by Mister Pamboli
03-19-2002 4:56 PM


quote:
Originally posted by Mister Pamboli:
Ironically, yes in a way. Kant started the process of restricting the definition of reason and to what it can be applied which the Logical Positivists took to an extreme position.
I thought that can of worms was opened by the British empiricists, Locke, Hume et al.....
Didn`t Kant attempt to "unify" (spot the physicist we`re obsessed with unified theories) British empiricism and Continental rationalism (Descartes and Co.) forming German Idealism?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by Mister Pamboli, posted 03-19-2002 4:56 PM Mister Pamboli has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 35 by John, posted 06-14-2002 1:46 AM joz has not replied

  
joz
Inactive Member


Message 10 of 46 (7492)
03-21-2002 10:51 AM
Reply to: Message 9 by LudvanB
03-21-2002 2:14 AM


quote:
Originally posted by LudvanB:

Actually,Jefferson was the father of American secularism and everyone should really thank him for it...look at Saudi Arabia,Afghanistan in the last 5 years and a few other muslim country or to Europe from the 10th to the 16th century to see the result of a church driven state.

Really I thought it was John Locke who came up with the whole concept of equality and "inalienable" rights of man concepts that were used in the bloodless (or Glorious) revolution in the 1680`s in England...
Surely given that Jefferson was paraphrasing Locke that makes Locke the Grandfather of American secularism.....
[This message has been edited by joz, 03-21-2002]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by LudvanB, posted 03-21-2002 2:14 AM LudvanB has not replied

  
joz
Inactive Member


Message 13 of 46 (7560)
03-21-2002 9:41 PM
Reply to: Message 12 by Minnemooseus
03-21-2002 4:14 PM


quote:
Originally posted by minnemooseus:
/B]
Why thanks Moose....
Of course your post was a little drab, maybe it needed some color (spelling for Moose)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by Minnemooseus, posted 03-21-2002 4:14 PM Minnemooseus has not replied

  
joz
Inactive Member


Message 17 of 46 (7638)
03-22-2002 1:21 PM
Reply to: Message 16 by Minnemooseus
03-22-2002 1:04 AM


quote:
Originally posted by minnemooseus:
I'm not familiar with Bablefish...
This may be what Mr P means...
http://babelfish.altavista.com
On another note I think Babelfish are from Douglas Adams Hitchhikers guide to the galaxy series....
They translate speech hence the name Babel (as in tower of) fish...
[This message has been edited by joz, 03-22-2002]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by Minnemooseus, posted 03-22-2002 1:04 AM Minnemooseus has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024