Should there be a law against public institutions that lie for money?

ringoNo.Above the law: America's worst charities | CNNI am suggesting that those listed here in this link are abusing the system when only a very small % ends up where they say their donations ends up.Lincolns for staff is hardly charity.Regards
DL

NoNukesKeep to the issue and not the personal and you might get better results."It turns out that the Constitution prevents the state from making such determinations."Tell that to those, like Koresh, just before the government moves in.As to your first amendment. If it was well written in the first place, no amendments would have been required.Your country is run by oligarch owners just as the rest of the world is.The fact that you do not see it makes your opinions near worthless.Regards
DL

RAZDIt is hard to educate properly when your religious side is large and without morals.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1dtC052f9A4The land of the brave is trying hard to become the land of the dumb.Regards
DL

AZPaul3Yes. Liars and immoral pricks.Look at the % that actually gets to those who need it.Regards
DL

^^Thanks for this.Regards
DL

ringoIf the laws are that badly written that those corporations and religions can get away with their lies and their fleeing of the public then they should be scrapped for a new law.If the law is deemed to be good then enforcement should be the rule of the day.Otherwise, the government should be clear as to what it deems moral or not in terms of value for $ for the givers and force the companies to put up if they can or get out of the lying business if they cannot.Regards
DL

ringo"Since when is the government in the business of guaranteeing value for $?"Since the time that they decided to be the ones to control the tax exemptions.What governments need do is set a minimum return to the charity or disallow the tax break.To do less is complicity in fraud as far as I am concerned.Regards
DL

ringoDo you think 0% to be a moral % and reason enough for you and I to have to pay the tax burden that that charity is putting into it's own pocket?Regards
DL

ringoI agree. That way our funds are not supporting fat cats and their Cadillacs and pleasure cruisers.Regards
DL

ringoMany reasons but the main one is cross border NGO's are better accepted all ove4r the world than GO's.Some of the charities work well and bringing others to that standard of excellence is better than throwing out the baby with the bath water.Regards
DL

ringoIf any legal part of government and it's legal staff is looking at those numbers and do not see fraud, then we need a new definition for fraud based on morality because the list I gave shows clearly that what we presently accept and do prosecute is not moral.I do not know how the laws of various countries are written but this present situation is pure corruption from MPOV.Regards
DL