Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,507 Year: 3,764/9,624 Month: 635/974 Week: 248/276 Day: 20/68 Hour: 1/5


EvC Forum Side Orders Coffee House Gun Control Again

Summations Only

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Gun Control Again
jar
Member (Idle past 417 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 3781 of 5179 (765732)
08-05-2015 8:25 AM
Reply to: Message 3780 by saab93f
08-05-2015 5:57 AM


Yes but that does nothing to the fact that vehicles serve a useful purpose, handguns do not.
Don't you mean that handguns do not serve a useful purpose that YOU see?

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3780 by saab93f, posted 08-05-2015 5:57 AM saab93f has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 3782 by Tangle, posted 08-05-2015 8:37 AM jar has replied
 Message 3790 by saab93f, posted 08-05-2015 12:40 PM jar has not replied
 Message 3837 by Percy, posted 08-06-2015 5:56 PM jar has not replied

Tangle
Member
Posts: 9504
From: UK
Joined: 10-07-2011
Member Rating: 4.8


Message 3782 of 5179 (765733)
08-05-2015 8:37 AM
Reply to: Message 3781 by jar
08-05-2015 8:25 AM


Jar writes:
Don't you mean that handguns do not serve a useful purpose that YOU see?
They obviously have a useful purpose when regulated and controlled properly.
The issue seems to be that guns are not regulated and controlled in a sensible way in the USA. This is a view held by your president and the rest of the developed world.
The fact that it isn't obvious to you and the NRA is impressive.

Je suis Charlie. Je suis Ahmed. Je suis Juif.
Life, don't talk to me about life - Marvin the Paranoid Android
"Science adjusts it's views based on what's observed.
Faith is the denial of observation so that Belief can be preserved."
- Tim Minchin, in his beat poem, Storm.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3781 by jar, posted 08-05-2015 8:25 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 3783 by jar, posted 08-05-2015 8:58 AM Tangle has replied

jar
Member (Idle past 417 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 3783 of 5179 (765734)
08-05-2015 8:58 AM
Reply to: Message 3782 by Tangle
08-05-2015 8:37 AM


They obviously have a useful purpose when regulated and controlled properly.
The issue seems to be that guns are not regulated and controlled in a sensible way in the USA. This is a view held by your president and the rest of the developed world.
The fact that it isn't obvious to you and the NRA is impressive.
It is also impressive that you seem totally incapable of reading what I post.
I have said repeatedly that the issue is a matter of misuse, of a lack of education and a disrespect for regulations in the US.
But regulations mean nothing when they are generally ignored and in the US, ignoring regulations is rampant.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3782 by Tangle, posted 08-05-2015 8:37 AM Tangle has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 3784 by Theodoric, posted 08-05-2015 9:16 AM jar has replied
 Message 3786 by 1.61803, posted 08-05-2015 10:31 AM jar has seen this message but not replied
 Message 3791 by Tangle, posted 08-05-2015 1:12 PM jar has not replied

Theodoric
Member
Posts: 9150
From: Northwest, WI, USA
Joined: 08-15-2005
Member Rating: 3.3


Message 3784 of 5179 (765735)
08-05-2015 9:16 AM
Reply to: Message 3783 by jar
08-05-2015 8:58 AM


How about you actually back up statements with actual examples or ideas?
What gun regulations are ignored? How would these supposed regulations help with the current gun issues without requiring more legal control of guns?
If you want to to actually discuss the topic you need to do that. If instead you want to continue to derail then continue as you are.
ABE
It is also impressive that you seem totally incapable of reading what I post.
You say the same thing to a lot of people. Maybe the problem is not people's comprehension? Maybe it is your cryptic, nonsensical way of writing and posting? A little self awareness goes a long way.
Edited by Theodoric, : More thoughts

Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts
"God did it" is not an argument. It is an excuse for intellectual laziness.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3783 by jar, posted 08-05-2015 8:58 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 3785 by jar, posted 08-05-2015 9:37 AM Theodoric has replied

jar
Member (Idle past 417 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 3785 of 5179 (765737)
08-05-2015 9:37 AM
Reply to: Message 3784 by Theodoric
08-05-2015 9:16 AM


I cannot help peoples inability to actually read what it written. That is NMP.
How about you actually back up statements with actual examples or ideas?
What gun regulations are ignored? How would these supposed regulations help with the current gun issues without requiring more legal control of guns?
I have outlined most of the problems but will gladly attempt yet again.
In the US we currently have no way to track who should be prevented from buying a gun. We do not track mental disorders or physical limitations. We do not educate people on gun safety just as we do not educate people about safe driving (a much larger problem).
We need to track such information. Hell, it would likely be a good idea if the US actually had a list of who is a citizen.
I would support making concealed handguns illegal and requiring open carry. Let the public see that gun owners are just like everyone else and really a far smaller threat than the average driver.
I would support mandatory gun training and annual certification (but only if we also required it to drive a vehicle; folks with guns don't scare me but all them drivers out there do).
I would support recognizing that there are NO accidental discharge incidents, if a modern handgun goes off when it was not intended then it is negligence, not accident.
I would support far stricter enforcement of existing gun laws (but also vehicular infractions).
I have never said I opposed all legal restrictions on guns, just the really stupid ones I've seen suggested.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3784 by Theodoric, posted 08-05-2015 9:16 AM Theodoric has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 3788 by Theodoric, posted 08-05-2015 11:26 AM jar has replied
 Message 3848 by Percy, posted 08-06-2015 9:28 PM jar has not replied

1.61803
Member (Idle past 1526 days)
Posts: 2928
From: Lone Star State USA
Joined: 02-19-2004


(1)
Message 3786 of 5179 (765738)
08-05-2015 10:31 AM
Reply to: Message 3783 by jar
08-05-2015 8:58 AM


From my cold dead stupid fingers....
Jar writes:
But regulations mean nothing when they are generally ignored and in the US, ignoring regulations is rampant.
Hi Jar, I do not know what regs are ignored but I do know that absolute ignorance and stupidity is rampant in the US in regards to guns.
For example: Almost every day I hear about a child getting his/her hands on gun and shooting either themselves or other.
Why? Ignorance and stupidity on the part of the parents or gun owner.
The guy who shot all those children at the Sandyhook elementary school . He was severely mentally disturbed and his mom buys and keeps high capacity assault rifles and handguns in the house where he can get his hands on them. Ignorant and stupid.
James Holmes blows away people in a movie theater in Co. Again
mentally disturbed asshole getting his hands on firearms to kill innocent people. wtf?
We can not un-invent the wheel, guns are here to stay. Even if there was a massive crackdown on them, even if another gun was never manufactured in this country zillions of guns exist and other zillions would be imported. Limiting ammo again would only deter the easily deterred.
What we need is a cultural revolution in regards to guns. Guns are a fascination for us Americans. We simply love our guns, so much so we are willing to suffer the consequences of the gun related deaths brought about from a ignorant/stupid armed society.

"You were not there for the beginning. You will not be there for the end. Your knowledge of what is going on can only be superficial and relative" William S. Burroughs

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3783 by jar, posted 08-05-2015 8:58 AM jar has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 3787 by Diomedes, posted 08-05-2015 11:01 AM 1.61803 has replied
 Message 3849 by Percy, posted 08-06-2015 9:44 PM 1.61803 has replied

Diomedes
Member
Posts: 995
From: Central Florida, USA
Joined: 09-13-2013


(2)
Message 3787 of 5179 (765739)
08-05-2015 11:01 AM
Reply to: Message 3786 by 1.61803
08-05-2015 10:31 AM


Re: From my cold dead stupid fingers....
What we need is a cultural revolution in regards to guns. Guns are a fascination for us Americans. We simply love our guns, so much so we are willing to suffer the consequences of the gun related deaths brought about from a ignorant/stupid armed society.
This has been the message the Democrats have been trying to push forth, but frankly, they have done a dismal job of it. The main issue is the gun culture, as you are alluding to. This fixation on guns as if they are some sacrosanct totem that must be worshipped is really bizarre in my eyes. It almost reminds me of how Samurai's and warriors of old used to imbue their swords as having some mystical quality.
Incidentally, for those on this thread, there was a documentary on Frontline PBS recently called 'Gunned Down'. Really interesting and I would recommend checking it out. It takes a focus on the NRA and actually demonstrates how that organization, which actually started on a well to do gun safety mandate was completely usurped by a few unscrupulous people that transformed it into one of the most feared lobbying engines this country has ever seen.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3786 by 1.61803, posted 08-05-2015 10:31 AM 1.61803 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 3789 by 1.61803, posted 08-05-2015 12:04 PM Diomedes has replied
 Message 3863 by Percy, posted 08-07-2015 10:55 AM Diomedes has not replied

Theodoric
Member
Posts: 9150
From: Northwest, WI, USA
Joined: 08-15-2005
Member Rating: 3.3


Message 3788 of 5179 (765740)
08-05-2015 11:26 AM
Reply to: Message 3785 by jar
08-05-2015 9:37 AM


More not answering questions posed to you.
Jar writes:
I have said repeatedly that the issue is a matter of misuse, of a lack of education and a disrespect for regulations in the US.
But regulations mean nothing when they are generally ignored and in the US, ignoring regulations is rampant.
Me writes:
What gun regulations are ignored? How would these supposed regulations help with the current gun issues without requiring more legal control of guns?
Jar writes:
I would support far stricter enforcement of existing gun laws (but also vehicular infractions).
Do you really think you addressed my questions? Most of your proposals are new stricter regulations. And again you are attempting to hijack the thread with your continuing rants about non-analogous car driving.

Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts
"God did it" is not an argument. It is an excuse for intellectual laziness.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3785 by jar, posted 08-05-2015 9:37 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 3829 by jar, posted 08-06-2015 8:57 AM Theodoric has replied

1.61803
Member (Idle past 1526 days)
Posts: 2928
From: Lone Star State USA
Joined: 02-19-2004


Message 3789 of 5179 (765741)
08-05-2015 12:04 PM
Reply to: Message 3787 by Diomedes
08-05-2015 11:01 AM


Re: From my cold dead stupid fingers....
It is ironic that the mindset about why one carrys or owns a guns is sometimes a self fulfilling prophecy. I am sure no one wakes up and says today my kid will accidentally blow his head off with my loaded fire arm that I purchased to protect him with.
If one owns a gun then they carry the responsibility of having a device that can cause instantaneous death. It does not matter what, where, who, or when or why. That gun can and will kill if it is employed on target either on purpose or not.
Perhaps that is part of the allure of gun ownership. It makes the owner instantly powerful. But one does not need a gun to kill.
It was William Burroughs that said, " No one owns life, but anyone who can pick up a frying pan owns death."
Im going to watch that PBS special you mentioned. Regards.

"You were not there for the beginning. You will not be there for the end. Your knowledge of what is going on can only be superficial and relative" William S. Burroughs

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3787 by Diomedes, posted 08-05-2015 11:01 AM Diomedes has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 3794 by Diomedes, posted 08-05-2015 2:40 PM 1.61803 has seen this message but not replied

saab93f
Member (Idle past 1417 days)
Posts: 265
From: Finland
Joined: 12-17-2009


Message 3790 of 5179 (765743)
08-05-2015 12:40 PM
Reply to: Message 3781 by jar
08-05-2015 8:25 AM


Don't you mean that handguns do not serve a useful purpose that YOU see?
Could be. I may just be so limited in my understanding that apart from target practising I do not come up with anything even remotely positive.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3781 by jar, posted 08-05-2015 8:25 AM jar has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 3793 by New Cat's Eye, posted 08-05-2015 2:37 PM saab93f has replied

Tangle
Member
Posts: 9504
From: UK
Joined: 10-07-2011
Member Rating: 4.8


Message 3791 of 5179 (765744)
08-05-2015 1:12 PM
Reply to: Message 3783 by jar
08-05-2015 8:58 AM


Jar writes:
I have said repeatedly that the issue is a matter of misuse, of a lack of education and a disrespect for regulations in the US.
Jar, whilst there is a right to keep and bear arms, there is no adequate regulation and control of guns in the USA. The inconsistent rules limiting that right are merely a side salad, regularly discarded. To make any sensible change, that amendment needs amending.

Je suis Charlie. Je suis Ahmed. Je suis Juif.
Life, don't talk to me about life - Marvin the Paranoid Android
"Science adjusts it's views based on what's observed.
Faith is the denial of observation so that Belief can be preserved."
- Tim Minchin, in his beat poem, Storm.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3783 by jar, posted 08-05-2015 8:58 AM jar has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 3792 by New Cat's Eye, posted 08-05-2015 2:31 PM Tangle has replied

New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


(1)
Message 3792 of 5179 (765745)
08-05-2015 2:31 PM
Reply to: Message 3791 by Tangle
08-05-2015 1:12 PM


Jar, whilst there is a right to keep and bear arms, there is no adequate regulation and control of guns in the USA. The inconsistent rules limiting that right are merely a side salad, regularly discarded. To make any sensible change, that amendment needs amending.
Thanks for admitting that you'd prefer to just deny me one of my rights.
I reject your offer.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3791 by Tangle, posted 08-05-2015 1:12 PM Tangle has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 3799 by ringo, posted 08-05-2015 3:25 PM New Cat's Eye has replied
 Message 3817 by Tangle, posted 08-05-2015 5:41 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 3793 of 5179 (765746)
08-05-2015 2:37 PM
Reply to: Message 3790 by saab93f
08-05-2015 12:40 PM


Don't you mean that handguns do not serve a useful purpose that YOU see?
Could be. I may just be so limited in my understanding that apart from target practising I do not come up with anything even remotely positive.
Think about why practically every cop on duty carries a handgun.
They're the best weapon you can have.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3790 by saab93f, posted 08-05-2015 12:40 PM saab93f has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 3795 by saab93f, posted 08-05-2015 2:53 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

Diomedes
Member
Posts: 995
From: Central Florida, USA
Joined: 09-13-2013


(1)
Message 3794 of 5179 (765747)
08-05-2015 2:40 PM
Reply to: Message 3789 by 1.61803
08-05-2015 12:04 PM


Re: From my cold dead stupid fingers....
If one owns a gun then they carry the responsibility of having a device that can cause instantaneous death. It does not matter what, where, who, or when or why. That gun can and will kill if it is employed on target either on purpose or not.
Agreed. Sadly, as we have seen in many cases, there is no idiot test in this country and the end result is guns are often not handled correctly or find their way into the hands of those that should never have one.
Perhaps that is part of the allure of gun ownership. It makes the owner instantly powerful. But one does not need a gun to kill.
Very true. I studied copious martial arts in my lifetime and I am fully aware of the types of strikes or moves I can perform that could be fatal. But one thing that I have to say that I don't approve of regarding our gun culture here is we have adopted a 'shoot first, ask questions later' methodology. Things like the stand your ground laws basically encourage people to escalate a situation as opposed to trying to calm things down. What ever happened to trying to maintain our composure and resolve a matter civilly before we decide to 'pop a cap' in someone.
We had a case in my state of Florida where a retired police officer in a movie theater used his gun to kill another person because that guy threw popcorn at him after an argument about his cellphone. And this is a former cop for crying out loud!
One other thing (and I have said this before), the one argument that drives me beyond nuts when I speak to other gun owners is this fixation they have on needing to be armed because they might need to overthrow a tyrannical government. I am sorry, but that is the most moronic statement I have ever heard. The most staunch Ayn Rand acolyte could go into Gander Mountain and buy ever gun they sell and it wouldn't mean a hill of beans the moment the government showed up with ten M1A1 tanks. The soldiers inside would be playing cards laughing their asses off as you emptied every clip you had only to watch it bounce off the tank's armor.
We as a society have already consciously acknowledged that the military is ALWAYS going to be better armed that its citizenry. So far as I know, Bill Gates can't buy a fleet of tanks, jets and missiles. And in my mind, that is a good thing. So we need to drop this anachronistic notion of being armed to the teeth to keep our government in check. I think we carry far more power in our votes than we do in our home ordinance.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3789 by 1.61803, posted 08-05-2015 12:04 PM 1.61803 has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 3796 by New Cat's Eye, posted 08-05-2015 3:04 PM Diomedes has replied

saab93f
Member (Idle past 1417 days)
Posts: 265
From: Finland
Joined: 12-17-2009


Message 3795 of 5179 (765748)
08-05-2015 2:53 PM
Reply to: Message 3793 by New Cat's Eye
08-05-2015 2:37 PM


Think about why practically every cop on duty carries a handgun.
They're the best weapon you can have.
And if only I wasn't a police officer myself...
A sad necessity does not make the guns any more welcome or desirable.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3793 by New Cat's Eye, posted 08-05-2015 2:37 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 3797 by New Cat's Eye, posted 08-05-2015 3:05 PM saab93f has replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024