Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,817 Year: 3,074/9,624 Month: 919/1,588 Week: 102/223 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   What is the lowest multiplication rate for Humans ?
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 285 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 73 of 144 (766890)
08-23-2015 3:17 PM
Reply to: Message 71 by goldenlightArchangel
08-22-2015 2:04 PM


Re: Evolutionary theory mathematically proven to be inconsistent
I shall reply to this as soon as you translate it into English.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 71 by goldenlightArchangel, posted 08-22-2015 2:04 PM goldenlightArchangel has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 285 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 75 of 144 (766912)
08-23-2015 7:14 PM
Reply to: Message 74 by goldenlightArchangel
08-23-2015 7:10 PM


Re: It is mathematically proven to be inconsistent but money speaks louder than Math
The Fish do not go to your home. You must go and bring the fish to your home.
Which fish must ringo bring to his home?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 74 by goldenlightArchangel, posted 08-23-2015 7:10 PM goldenlightArchangel has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 285 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


(1)
Message 91 of 144 (767249)
08-27-2015 12:10 PM


Do the people answering CrazyDiamond7 really understand what he's saying, or are they just winging it?

Replies to this message:
 Message 92 by NoNukes, posted 08-27-2015 6:16 PM Dr Adequate has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 285 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 104 of 144 (767493)
08-29-2015 10:33 PM
Reply to: Message 99 by goldenlightArchangel
08-29-2015 5:34 AM


Re: Important: For All Posters ( & Readers ) The One Million Dollar Question
According to the lowest possible rate of population growth, population x 15 - 80 % per every thousand years, even when only the Fifth part survives you get 9,565,938,000 people in the end of 14 thousand years.
Therefore it is clear that the next thing to do ( on behalf of the Evolutionary theory ) is to disprove that the lowest possible rate of population growth is p x 15 - 80 %
Anything else would be low-effort arguments that drift us to far, far away from facing the anomaly in the theory.
*
In order for you to disprove that the lowest possible rate of population growth is population x 15 - 80 % the next thing to do ( on behalf of the theory )
was to answer or explain What is the lowest possible rate for Humans to keep on growing and multiplying since zero and negative are not growing nor multiplying either.
*
The local boards of education do have specific reasons for not seeing nor answer the above question.
Reputation and financial reasons are on top of the rank of what matters more, regardless of the fact that EVOLUTIONARY THEORY IMPLIES NON-EXISTENCE OF POPULATION GROWTH FOR OVER 25 THOUSAND YEARS
*
None of this makes any sense.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 99 by goldenlightArchangel, posted 08-29-2015 5:34 AM goldenlightArchangel has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 285 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 119 of 144 (809044)
05-15-2017 3:34 PM
Reply to: Message 113 by goldenlightArchangel
05-15-2017 2:56 PM


Re: ULTIMATE LIST of Problems that Evolutionary theory has failed to solve
Abiogenesis has been proven to be a lie
as a matter of of fact, abiogenesis in all is just another way of making easy money from the sponsorships, by deceiving others . .
Also their people are not able to create a living being
and their genetic technology are just clones of living beings that do already exist.
Every teacher on Human Origins has become a liar
for not facing the fact that his theory for Human multiplication on the planet and Europe should be backed up by the presentation of a population growth model.
Time to see beyond the spoon. Stop giving money to liars, and stop being spoonfed . .
. . bring up your list of problems that evolutionary theory has failed to solve . .
That was an odd collection of words.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 113 by goldenlightArchangel, posted 05-15-2017 2:56 PM goldenlightArchangel has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 120 by Tangle, posted 05-15-2017 3:51 PM Dr Adequate has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 285 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 125 of 144 (809180)
05-16-2017 5:26 PM
Reply to: Message 123 by goldenlightArchangel
05-16-2017 5:09 PM


Re: ULTIMATE LIST of Problems that Evolutionary theory has failed to solve
and one of those reasons is that if there were Humans multiplying on this Earth 34,000 years ago then it would have taken several global exterminations of Humans occuring every five thousand years interval, because that is the only way the Human population would have reached 10 to 15 million people (10 thousand years ago) rather than 5,5 billion people.
What growth rate are you falsely assuming for the human population over that period, and why are you ignoring the fact that it's known to be wrong?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 123 by goldenlightArchangel, posted 05-16-2017 5:09 PM goldenlightArchangel has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024