What is the lowest multiplication rate for Humans ?

*Hello Ringo,Your reply drifts to far away from the subject since the existence of extinctions has nothing to do with growing and multiplying or a lowest possible rate of multiplication.*

quote:

---

Is the Evolutionary theory mathematically proven to be inconsistent?

​

Yes. It is proven to be an error. Because it is definitely not possible that 2,000 people in Europe would have taken more than 25 thousand years to reach 1 million.

​

TOO many years and TOO few people! Simple but true! ( O.N.O. WV )

​

*

​

Evolutionary theory does much more than stating 'there were people on the range',

​

It states 'there were people on the range 35,000 years ago', without presenting its chronological basis.

​

*

​

Originally quoted from topix for Spotlight: How to Entangle a Juridical Panthera

---

*That is, Evolutionary theory must and should not omit what is the Evolutionary proposal for consistency which equates to a lowest possible rate of multiplication for Humans to grow and multiply.That is why Evolutionary statements are surrealist; they are without chronological evidence with regards to population growth and real life experiences, but just round and round. And round.*Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : Originally quoted from topix for Spotlight: How to Entangle a Juridical Panthera

*n + 1 is not a multiplication formula.*Samples of regular multiplication formula for minimum increase.population x 25 - 80 % per every thousand yearspopulation x 12 - 85 % per every thousand years*

*There is no rate that can be measured if the addition of 1 takes place over some anonymous timeframe.Description/specification of the timeframe or period of time is required.*

*

quote:

---

... Population levels may remain stable ...

---

*You know that the population levels of Europe have always grown and never remained stable during a timeline of five thousand years,That is why there are specific ( financial ) reasons for many to state that the European population did remain stable or declined when they would have taken allegedly 20 thousand years to go from 2,000 to 5,000 people, according to the surrealist population levels, absurdly and bizarrely proposed by the Evolutionary theory.*According to Real life experiences, the Evolutionary proposals to population growth never happened.*And I'm not a creation. I was not created then. I'm not created now.*

*Dear Coyote,I appreciate your ability of highlighting the short-period variations in the population levels.Not only you have done this ludicrous job. Money has spoken about the importance and highest relevance of those short-period variations.Of course you would not mention that these variations occurred during very short periods of time in history if compared to 5,000 years.The results from 5,000 years of population growth are very bad to the theory; and that is why 5 thousand years are deemed to be a Spam, ( something undesired ) or an extremely serious Bug which causes a disturbance in the force of the theory.*Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : Money has spoken about the importance and highest relevance of those short-period variations.

*

quote:

---

... actual rates of growth are rarely the minimum rate of growth ...

---

*According to the lowest possible rate of population growth, population x 15 - 80 % per every thousand years, even when only the Fifth part survives you get 9,565,938,000 people in the end of 14 thousand years.Therefore it is clear that the next thing to do ( on behalf of the Evolutionary theory ) is to disprove that the lowest possible rate of population growth is p x 15 - 80 %Anything else would be low-effort arguments that drift us to far, far away from facing the anomaly in the theory.*In order for you to disprove that the lowest possible rate of population growth is population x 15 - 80 % the next thing to do ( on behalf of the theory )was to answer or explain What is the lowest possible rate for Humans to keep on growing and multiplying since zero and negative are not growing nor multiplying either.*The local boards of education do have specific reasons for not seeing nor answer the above question.Reputation and financial reasons are on top of the rank of what matters more, regardless of the fact that EVOLUTIONARY THEORY IMPLIES NON-EXISTENCE OF POPULATION GROWTH FOR OVER 25 THOUSAND YEARS*

*Hello Ringo,If one day you could measure the difference between mammoths and Humans,and if you could measure that by the means of distance,that is how far your question stays out of topic*

*

quote:

---

wrote: ... I'm comparing rate of growth of a human population with rate of growth of another animal population. How is that not a valid comparison?

---

*The above comparison can not be done unless you provide the rate of growth of Human population,that is, a person must have the lowest possible rate of growth ( per every 1,000 years ) that the Humans could keep on growing and multiplying.*Jedi Masterhood. To Learn. You Must*

Abiogenesis has been proven to be a lie
as a matter of of fact, abiogenesis in all is just another way of making easy money from the sponsorships, by deceiving others . .
Also their people are not able to create a living being
and their genetic technology are just clones of living beings that do already exist.Every teacher on Human Origins has become a liar
for not facing the fact that his theory for Human multiplication on the planet and Europe should be backed up by the presentation of a population growth model.Time to see beyond the spoon. Stop giving money to liars, and stop being spoonfed . .. . bring up your list of problems that evolutionary theory has failed to solve . .Edited by celestialGyoud, : update

There are four different reasons why your theory becomes obsolete,and one of those reasons is that if there were Humans multiplying on this Earth 34,000 years ago then it would have taken several global exterminations of Humans occuring every five thousand years interval, because that is the only way the Human population would have reached 10 to 15 million people (10 thousand years ago) rather than 5,5 billion people.Actually the reason why Evolutionary theory in regards to Human origins is not declared obsolete is because money speaks louder than Math.Edited by celestialGyoud, : update

.
.What is the lowest possible rate that the Humans could keep on growing and multiplying?With regards specifically to the origin of the Human body, the evolutionary theory is mathematically proven wrong. Because it is not possible that 2,000 people in Europe would have taken more than 25 thousand years to reach 1 million.Also, it is impossible that evolutionary theory can explain the origin or appearance of 42 different languages and ethnic groups in Europe..

.The fact is that evolutionary theory named human origins is entitled to explain the origin or appearance of 42 different languages and ethnic groups in Europe..

..Ask any teacher, Why there is no beginning of life on the outside of what is already living ??Let`s know what the correct answer is (when you post it here).And if you asked Me the same question I`d answer this:"Living energy, and our existence, do not have and never had a beginning. (period)
And you`d ask Me: Why?Answer: Because there is no beginning of life on the outside of what is already living. It means Our existence does not have a beginning on the outside of ourselves as well as life never had an origin externally, or, on the outside of the living things.And you would expose a point, saying to Me, for example: "...everything that has a beginning has an end ... so f people die then that life or the living ones had a beginning on the outside of what is living ...ISN`T IT"Answer: That would be true in case you were a machine or artificial intelligence.Actually, the beginning has nothing to do with continuous space-time.
Only the continuous space-time has an end. And that end does not occur without a termination of the continuous sequence.The beginning is something you become. it is a part of the process of becoming. You are born in the World because you became what you are, and you are still becoming what you must be in the measure you gain and process knowledge.You would probably ask a question more, maybe, where do I get these answers from?The name of the writing is "Belonging in the Most Beyond: Screenplay with Vanesscenzza Amy Lee", 177 pages, by Evanescenza Saggistica. Have a good job!!..