Is internet porn ruining our next generation? Is censorship the answer?

RAZDA good find. Thanks.We all know that the E . U. is ahead of us here.I showed that as high as 50% of children between 12 and 25 are being affected to the point of dysfunction and addiction.How high of a rate of damage would you tolerate before advocating for censorship?Or should we just ignore the damage?Regards
DLEdited by Greatest I am, : No reason given.

OmnivorousYet censorship is working against child porn.We are not far in thinking except that I see censorship as a viable tool for society to use.The Brits seem to agree as they have initiated controls of the media.Regards
DL

OmnivorousIllegal. Yes. Just as internet porn can be if we choose to make it so.If your drug store was allowing porn to be accessed by children, we would be up in arms, yet there it is on the net and parents do not seem to care.Even when given the damage statistics.Regards
DL

Tanypteryx"I am against censorship under any circumstances."You doubt the statistic.If true, would you still not act to help the 50%?If you would not act for that many, how many would you need to see hurt before demanding action and censorship or controls?Regards
DLRegards
DL

RAZDYour own line might be heading for extinction. Strange how you do not care.Regards
DLP.S. The population will level off at 10 billion, which the earth can readily take care of, and then start to shrink. No need for panic.

ringoTrue that I spoke of the bad in internet porn. Nothing on coercion rolling viewers though.The links given show quite well what harm internet porn in particular is bringing to our children.Mental as well as physical dysfunction.People do not seem to favor censorship but I see no other viable solution given all the conditions.Note that other than education and parental blocking, no one is coming up with anything viable.Regards
DL

ringoLook again for the first time.This following is what was given to me by another woman.'Monster Cock Destroys Slut Pu**y'
'(name) Loves Getting Her Pu**y Beaten Up'
'Sperm Swallowing Slut Wife Railed Hard'
'Nasty Ebony Public Slut get Cocks'
'Teen Slut on a Leash Gets C*m Drenched'Notice a pattern in how women are spoken of? See how a common theme is the penis as a weapon against the women? Type 'whore', 'slut', 'bitch', 'c**t' or any racialised term with the word porn and/or some word denoting some kind of abuse, see what comes up and then come back and tell us it's only a 'healthy expression of sexuality'.ringoThis is not what porn was in the good old days and the addictive aspects tells me we need to not treat it like the good old days.Regards
DL

TanypteryxJust trying to dither out why you would be so dead set on not doing the right thing for our children.If you have no high harm limit, then you are not much of a man.Regards
DL

RAZDIf you are happy to live without a sense of social justice or conscience, then yes, don't worry about anything and especially not the health of children.Regards
DL

TanypteryxYour last would be a lie as your attitude is demonstrated by your own words. You show who and what you are whenever you open your mouth.Regards
DL

ringoThat would go a long way into doing nothing and allowing harm to come to a large number of us.For evil to grow, all good people need do is nothing.Regards
DL

ringoHealthy habits are not the issue and what I gave was common internet porn fare.Regards
DL

ringoYou must have missed that our government as well as others are trying to censor/control the amount of addictive materials that food companies put into what we eat.Why not let them also do that when as much harm is being done as there seems to be?Regards
DL

arachnophiliaNo. I did not follow those links.I am quite all right with listening to and believing what the experts I linked to who are saying that it is not porn that is the direct enemy. It is the way our male minds work and the addicting values of the new high speed access technology. It is about our brains overdosing on the volume and variety of what can be accessed.Regards
DL

TanypteryxI would say logical more than irony.Regards
DL