Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,806 Year: 3,063/9,624 Month: 908/1,588 Week: 91/223 Day: 2/17 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Is Religion a Darwinian Adaption?
Loudmouth
Inactive Member


Message 1 of 2 (77050)
01-07-2004 6:20 PM


I found this abstract on PubMed using the keywords "instinct evolution". Of course, this article caught me off guard, but found it so fitting for this board that I just had to post it. This article does not precisely espouse my views but may strike up an interesting conversation nonetheless.
------------
REVIEW. Toward an evolutionary psychology of religiosity.
Soeling C, Voland E.
Zentrum fur Philosophie und Grundlagen der Wissenschaft der Universitat Giessen, Germany.
How can the evolution of religiosity be explained? To answer this question, we attempt to develop an understanding of the psychological domains underlying religious behaviour. We see four evolved domains, the sum and interaction of which constitute religiosity, namely: mysticism, ethics, myths and rituals. Even if the individual content, accents and implementations differ in each specific religion, they nevertheless derive from evolved Darwinian algorithms that are species-specific adaptations of homo sapiens. Mysticism. Intuitive ontologies are the basis for mystical experiences. Usually they serve to classify reality into animate and inanimate objects, animals or plants, for example. For a variety of psychological reasons, supernatural experiences result from a mixture of different ontological categories. Ethics. The basis for ethics lies in the social competency of human beings. Ethics is founded on the concept of social exchange ("social-contract algorithm") with its ideas about reciprocity, fairness, justice, cheater detection, in-group/out-group differentiation, etc. Myths. The basis for myths is the "language instinct". We interpret myths as the verbal expression of the cognitive content of those individual modules that constitute the belief system. Above all, myths document the experience and processing of contingency and thus help social bonding. Rituals. Rituals are based on the handicap principle. By making certain symbols and acts more expensive, they signal commitment for a reliable in-group morale. In conclusion, we argue that human religiosity emerges from a cognitive interaction between these four domains. Religiosity processes contingencies and enhances co-operation through social bonding, norm setting and cheater detection. It fulfils those functions for which the mental modules of its four domains have evolved so that we feel it appears to be justified to attribute to religiosity the evolutionary status of an adaptation.

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by Rei, posted 01-07-2004 7:40 PM Loudmouth has not replied

  
Rei
Member (Idle past 7012 days)
Posts: 1546
From: Iowa City, IA
Joined: 09-03-2003


Message 2 of 2 (77060)
01-07-2004 7:40 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Loudmouth
01-07-2004 6:20 PM


If I'm reading correctly, they're discussing "religion as a meme". Nothing revolutionary (religion is a classic example of memetic evolution), but still an interesting theory

"Illuminant light,
illuminate me."
[This message has been edited by Rei, 01-07-2004]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Loudmouth, posted 01-07-2004 6:20 PM Loudmouth has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024