Understanding through Discussion

QuickSearch

 Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ] EvC Forum active members: 84 (8914 total)
 Current session began: Page Loaded: 06-27-2019 5:59 AM
24 online now:
(24 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Upcoming Birthdays: ooh-child
Post Volume:
 Total: 854,844 Year: 9,880/19,786 Month: 2,302/2,119 Week: 338/724 Day: 1/62 Hour: 0/0

EvC Forum Side Orders Coffee House

# Are we in a new world Empire? A NWO?

Author Topic:   Are we in a new world Empire? A NWO?
ringo
Member
Posts: 16681
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005
Member Rating: 3.0

 Message 16 of 38 (771026) 10-17-2015 11:37 AM Reply to: Message 15 by Greatest I am10-16-2015 7:10 PM

 Greatest I am writes:You can either show you have manners as they relate to your last post or bite me.

You can either discuss the topic or run away. Let's try again:
quote:
Analyzing numbers is a ridiculous method for determining whether or not we have a new order. What's the threshold for "new"? If the number of people who die next year declines again, do we have a "newer" order?
You need to establish a cause-and-effect relationship between wars/deaths and order, not just a correlation (if there even is a correlation). Show us that the body count is declining because of a new order.

 This message is a reply to: Message 15 by Greatest I am, posted 10-16-2015 7:10 PM Greatest I am has not yet responded

Thugpreacha
Member
Posts: 12445
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.3

 Message 17 of 38 (776666) 01-18-2016 3:04 AM Reply to: Message 9 by Greatest I am10-14-2015 3:43 PM

New Secular Order Has Problems
 We should actually promote a NWO just so that we can know who owns us and demand a redistribution of wealth and an end to poverty.
The challenge is in the unification of "we". People rarely bite the hand that feeds them, even if they abhor the wealthy.

Chance as a real force is a myth. It has no basis in reality and no place in scientific inquiry. For science and philosophy to continue to advance in knowledge, chance must be demythologized once and for all. –RC Sproul
"A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." –Mark Twain

 This message is a reply to: Message 9 by Greatest I am, posted 10-14-2015 3:43 PM Greatest I am has responded

 Replies to this message: Message 18 by Greatest I am, posted 01-18-2016 10:24 AM Thugpreacha has acknowledged this reply

Greatest I am
Member (Idle past 553 days)
Posts: 1423
Joined: 01-24-2007

 Message 18 of 38 (776681) 01-18-2016 10:24 AM Reply to: Message 17 by Thugpreacha01-18-2016 3:04 AM

Re: New Secular Order Has Problems
Phat

True to a point but the filthy rich were not supposed to get as greedy as they have.

Have a look and tell us if you think that the situation is getting immoral on the part of the rich.

To me, it begins to look like we all belong to some oligarch.

There is no bill of sale but we are all slaves.

Regards
DL

 This message is a reply to: Message 17 by Thugpreacha, posted 01-18-2016 3:04 AM Thugpreacha has acknowledged this reply

 Replies to this message: Message 19 by Pressie, posted 01-19-2016 7:29 AM Greatest I am has responded

Pressie
Member
Posts: 2041
From: Pretoria, SA
Joined: 06-18-2010
Member Rating: 2.4

 Message 19 of 38 (776722) 01-19-2016 7:29 AM Reply to: Message 18 by Greatest I am01-18-2016 10:24 AM

Re: New Secular Order Has Problems
 Greatest I am writes:There is no bill of sale but we are all slaves.
Speak for yourself. I'm not a slave to anyone.

To me it seems as if you want to be a slave. To me, personally, you seem to be quite pathetic as you want to be a slave.

Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.

 This message is a reply to: Message 18 by Greatest I am, posted 01-18-2016 10:24 AM Greatest I am has responded

 Replies to this message: Message 22 by Greatest I am, posted 01-19-2016 11:14 AM Pressie has not yet responded

Tangle
Member
Posts: 6921
From: UK
Joined: 10-07-2011
Member Rating: 4.3

 Message 20 of 38 (776723) 01-19-2016 7:35 AM

62 people
I don't know about a new world order but it was announced this week that 62 people have more money than 50% of the world's population combined (3.6 billion people).

Something is very, very broken

http://www.nydailynews.com/...y-poorest-50-article-1.2500284

Edited by Tangle, : No reason given.

Je suis Charlie. Je suis Ahmed. Je suis Juif. Je suis Parisien.

Life, don't talk to me about life - Marvin the Paranoid Android

"Science adjusts it's views based on what's observed.
Faith is the denial of observation so that Belief can be preserved."
- Tim Minchin, in his beat poem, Storm.

 Replies to this message: Message 21 by Pressie, posted 01-19-2016 8:11 AM Tangle has not yet responded Message 23 by Greatest I am, posted 01-19-2016 11:19 AM Tangle has responded

Pressie
Member
Posts: 2041
From: Pretoria, SA
Joined: 06-18-2010
Member Rating: 2.4

 Message 21 of 38 (776725) 01-19-2016 8:11 AM Reply to: Message 20 by Tangle01-19-2016 7:35 AM

Re: 62 people
 Tangle writes:I don't know about a new world order but this week it was announced this week that 62 people have more money than 50% of the world's population combined (3.6 billion people).Something is very, very brokenhttp://www.nydailynews.com/...y-poorest-50-article-1.2500284
Yes, and the President of my country who got a private residence built from taxpayers money. And he got millions from taxpayers. Yet, he just had a twentieth child from his seventh wife. All being paid for by taxpayers, of course.
 This message is a reply to: Message 20 by Tangle, posted 01-19-2016 7:35 AM Tangle has not yet responded

Greatest I am
Member (Idle past 553 days)
Posts: 1423
Joined: 01-24-2007

 Message 22 of 38 (776736) 01-19-2016 11:14 AM Reply to: Message 19 by Pressie01-19-2016 7:29 AM

Re: New Secular Order Has Problems
Pressie

Enjoy some comedy.

Regards
DL

 This message is a reply to: Message 19 by Pressie, posted 01-19-2016 7:29 AM Pressie has not yet responded

Greatest I am
Member (Idle past 553 days)
Posts: 1423
Joined: 01-24-2007

 Message 23 of 38 (776738) 01-19-2016 11:19 AM Reply to: Message 20 by Tangle01-19-2016 7:35 AM

Re: 62 people
Tangle

That happens because the masses will not make moral judgements thanks to their slave conditioning of kowtowing to their masters.

I have posted this often while asking if it is showing an immoral situation and almost no one judges it at all.

With that kind of slavish mentality, the masses will never live in the democracies they crave and will just settle for the oligarchies we all live in.

We need a French Revolution across the whole world.

Regards
DL

 This message is a reply to: Message 20 by Tangle, posted 01-19-2016 7:35 AM Tangle has responded

 Replies to this message: Message 24 by Tangle, posted 01-19-2016 11:41 AM Greatest I am has responded

Tangle
Member
Posts: 6921
From: UK
Joined: 10-07-2011
Member Rating: 4.3

 (1)
 Message 24 of 38 (776739) 01-19-2016 11:41 AM Reply to: Message 23 by Greatest I am01-19-2016 11:19 AM

Re: 62 people
 GIA writes:We need a French Revolution across the whole world.

The French are no different.

Communism is the anwer, sadly that doesn't work either.

The nearest we've achieved are the liberal democracies of Scandanavia, and they're hardly perfect.

Je suis Charlie. Je suis Ahmed. Je suis Juif. Je suis Parisien.

Life, don't talk to me about life - Marvin the Paranoid Android

"Science adjusts it's views based on what's observed.
Faith is the denial of observation so that Belief can be preserved."
- Tim Minchin, in his beat poem, Storm.

 This message is a reply to: Message 23 by Greatest I am, posted 01-19-2016 11:19 AM Greatest I am has responded

 Replies to this message: Message 25 by Greatest I am, posted 01-19-2016 11:51 AM Tangle has responded

Greatest I am
Member (Idle past 553 days)
Posts: 1423
Joined: 01-24-2007

 Message 25 of 38 (776740) 01-19-2016 11:51 AM Reply to: Message 24 by Tangle01-19-2016 11:41 AM

Re: 62 people
Tangle

We have never really had a communist nation with a flat socio economic demographic pyramid. Even Russia and China have/had hierarchical shapes to theirs.

We need to have democracy dismantle our present oligarchies and produce a moral looking socio economic demographic pyramid for the whole world.

That is the moral way to go.

At present, conditions are such that those at the top are protected the way no one else is as the system protects their money and position. That is a form of eugenics at work.

I am putting links to a lot of information below. I hope you have the time to have a look at it.

Regards
DL

 This message is a reply to: Message 24 by Tangle, posted 01-19-2016 11:41 AM Tangle has responded

 Replies to this message: Message 26 by Tangle, posted 01-19-2016 12:15 PM Greatest I am has responded

Tangle
Member
Posts: 6921
From: UK
Joined: 10-07-2011
Member Rating: 4.3

 (1)
 Message 26 of 38 (776742) 01-19-2016 12:15 PM Reply to: Message 25 by Greatest I am01-19-2016 11:51 AM

Re: 62 people
 GIA writes:We have never really had a communist nation with a flat socio economic demographic pyramid. Even Russia and China have/had hierarchical shapes to theirs.

You need to ask yourself why? They had great moral ambitions but all failed.

It's generally called 'the human condition'. We're born to compete and look after our own. Social morality grows only very slowly. We're not ready to share fairly yet; as a species we're still childlike and greedy.

Je suis Charlie. Je suis Ahmed. Je suis Juif. Je suis Parisien.

Life, don't talk to me about life - Marvin the Paranoid Android

"Science adjusts it's views based on what's observed.
Faith is the denial of observation so that Belief can be preserved."
- Tim Minchin, in his beat poem, Storm.

 This message is a reply to: Message 25 by Greatest I am, posted 01-19-2016 11:51 AM Greatest I am has responded

 Replies to this message: Message 27 by NosyNed, posted 01-19-2016 1:03 PM Tangle has responded Message 29 by Greatest I am, posted 01-19-2016 7:05 PM Tangle has responded

NosyNed
Member
Posts: 8842
Joined: 04-04-2003

 (1)
 Message 27 of 38 (776745) 01-19-2016 1:03 PM Reply to: Message 26 by Tangle01-19-2016 12:15 PM

History
It would be interesting to see how this inequity has changed over time. It appears to be worse now than a decade or 3 ago. Maybe the worst in the last century.

Is it as bad as the late 1800's in the era of the robber barons?

How does it compare to medieval Europe's feudal societies?

 This message is a reply to: Message 26 by Tangle, posted 01-19-2016 12:15 PM Tangle has responded

 Replies to this message: Message 28 by Tangle, posted 01-19-2016 1:34 PM NosyNed has not yet responded Message 30 by Greatest I am, posted 01-19-2016 7:10 PM NosyNed has not yet responded

Tangle
Member
Posts: 6921
From: UK
Joined: 10-07-2011
Member Rating: 4.3

 Message 28 of 38 (776746) 01-19-2016 1:34 PM Reply to: Message 27 by NosyNed01-19-2016 1:03 PM

Re: History
The word has always been massively unequal. But I suspect the real gap was wider then than now. Or another way of putting it, it's probably better to be poor today, than rich then.

The reason is the way GDP was static for thousands of years, then grew exponentially after the enlightenment and industrial revolution. (But, of course this is a very western-centric view of the world.)

Je suis Charlie. Je suis Ahmed. Je suis Juif. Je suis Parisien.

Life, don't talk to me about life - Marvin the Paranoid Android

"Science adjusts it's views based on what's observed.
Faith is the denial of observation so that Belief can be preserved."
- Tim Minchin, in his beat poem, Storm.

 This message is a reply to: Message 27 by NosyNed, posted 01-19-2016 1:03 PM NosyNed has not yet responded

Greatest I am
Member (Idle past 553 days)
Posts: 1423
Joined: 01-24-2007

 Message 29 of 38 (776762) 01-19-2016 7:05 PM Reply to: Message 26 by Tangle01-19-2016 12:15 PM

Re: 62 people
Tangle

You seem to be saying that what I think are our strong points to be deficits for mankind.

The ambition to have us all the same is hardly moral. It may in fact be immoral. We used to think eugenics to equalize us all to be immoral. I think it still is.

I do not see us as greedy but do recognize we have a selfish gene that wants to see each of us become the best or fittest of our species. I see nothing wrong with our instincts and would not try to work against them.

If you know of Jung and Freud's Father Complex, you will know that our instincts drive us to compete so as to make us the fittest. If they did no, the weak would definitely inherit the earth, as Jesus put it, but that goes completely against nature.

The drive to the greatest fitness is not a deficit but man's greatest asset.

Regards
DL

 This message is a reply to: Message 26 by Tangle, posted 01-19-2016 12:15 PM Tangle has responded

 Replies to this message: Message 31 by Tangle, posted 01-20-2016 3:55 AM Greatest I am has responded

Greatest I am
Member (Idle past 553 days)
Posts: 1423
Joined: 01-24-2007

 Message 30 of 38 (776763) 01-19-2016 7:10 PM Reply to: Message 27 by NosyNed01-19-2016 1:03 PM

Re: History
NosyNed

Have a look at this graph and see that the robber barons of yesteryear are still with us and sitting at the extreme right of this graph.

I also just picked this up and may be the latest information.

http://www.nydailynews.com/...y-poorest-50-article-1.2500284

Regards
DL

 This message is a reply to: Message 27 by NosyNed, posted 01-19-2016 1:03 PM NosyNed has not yet responded

 Date format: mm-dd-yyyy Timezone: ET (US)
 Prev 1 2 3 Next