Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,839 Year: 4,096/9,624 Month: 967/974 Week: 294/286 Day: 15/40 Hour: 1/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Jesus and his sacrifice is Satan’s test of man’s morality.
GDR
Member
Posts: 6202
From: Sidney, BC, Canada
Joined: 05-22-2005
Member Rating: 2.1


Message 150 of 478 (775431)
01-01-2016 5:11 PM
Reply to: Message 131 by Omnivorous
12-31-2015 5:19 PM


Re: misrepresentation
Omnivorous writes:
It's good to be reminded of my childhood moral outrage at the slaughter of the innocents in the Bible. Those stories made me question my church, and the inadequate answers made me leave. My long ago revulsion still makes me question the moral sanity of Biblical Inerrantists.
That's the problem isn't it. Christians who in an attempt to justify the belief that God actually did those things in order to support and inerrant Bible so discredit God and the faith that it is no wonder people who see that as representing it leave. If I believed that to be a Christian I had to essentially make an idol out of the Bible, and believe that God actually did those things, then I too would reject the faith.
Following God whose Word and wisdom is incarnate in Jesus is a very different form of Christianity than those who believe that God would be guilty of some of the things attributed to Him in the OT. One of things that Jesus did actually was to abrogate the notion that God was like that when He told them that they were to love their enemy. That was in a society where His countrymen were being brutalized by the Romans.

He has told you, O man, what is good ; And what does the LORD require of you But to do justice, to love kindness, And to walk humbly with your God.
Micah 6:8

This message is a reply to:
 Message 131 by Omnivorous, posted 12-31-2015 5:19 PM Omnivorous has not replied

  
GDR
Member
Posts: 6202
From: Sidney, BC, Canada
Joined: 05-22-2005
Member Rating: 2.1


Message 152 of 478 (775433)
01-01-2016 5:31 PM
Reply to: Message 134 by Hyroglyphx
01-01-2016 2:16 AM


Re: Can't have it both ways
Hyroglyphx writes:
Then your "belief" is at odds with your own religion. Either God knows all things or he doesn't. And if he doesn't know all things, as you are suggesting here, then the Scriptures must necessarily be in error, in which case you would have to reasonably call in to question its entirety.
God's omniscience:
"For whenever our heart condemns us, God is greater than our heart, and he knows everything." -- John 3:20
"Do you know how God lays his command upon them and causes the lightning of his cloud to shine? Do you know the balancings of the clouds, the wondrous works of him who is perfect in knowledge" -- Job 37:15-16
So which is it; because you can't have it both ways?
I have not said that I don't believe that God knows everything, whatever everything even means in this case.
I'm saying that I believe that in general the future is unknowable even to God. It is my contention that He has created a world where the future is open. I wrote this earlier to Tangle:
quote:
Omniscience is about knowing everything there is to know. It is my belief, that the future is open and unknowable even to God.
If the future is knowable then all of history is pre-ordained. There would be no free will and everything becomes purposeless. This is not the message of the Bible, where we see in the OT Yahweh negotiating with the Jews, nor do we see it in the NT where Jesus exhorts people to change their ways. The whole point of Jesus doing what He did becomes pointless if all history is pre-ordained.
I suggest that I'm still only having it one way. Happy 2016.

He has told you, O man, what is good ; And what does the LORD require of you But to do justice, to love kindness, And to walk humbly with your God.
Micah 6:8

This message is a reply to:
 Message 134 by Hyroglyphx, posted 01-01-2016 2:16 AM Hyroglyphx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 173 by Hyroglyphx, posted 01-02-2016 3:36 AM GDR has replied

  
GDR
Member
Posts: 6202
From: Sidney, BC, Canada
Joined: 05-22-2005
Member Rating: 2.1


Message 153 of 478 (775434)
01-01-2016 5:40 PM
Reply to: Message 138 by Faith
01-01-2016 2:16 PM


Re: misrepresentation
Faith writes:
You make the mistake of thinking they are "innocents." That's the whole point everybody is missing. God is punishing accumulated sins. In some cases there is a report about those sins so you don't have to just assume it, but I am writing from a vacation place and don't want to take the time to look stuff up. The OT is supposed to teach us about how judgment comes against us, for what reasons and so on, but if you call them "innocents" you miss the whole point. Allah murders innocents, Jehovah does not.
Just curious Faith. Do you consider yourself one of the innocents? Doesn't the Bible say that there is no one righteous.
In an earlier post you claimed that God brought retribution to the US via the civil war. How about those who died fighting against the practice of slavery? You didn't respond to the idea that slavery was abolished in Britain due primarily to the work of the Christian William Wilberforce without any bloodshed. Does God like the Brits better than the Yanks? (Actually He is particularly fond of Canadians but we'll keep that between ourselves. )
Have a great 2016 Faith. You have an indomitable spirit.

He has told you, O man, what is good ; And what does the LORD require of you But to do justice, to love kindness, And to walk humbly with your God.
Micah 6:8

This message is a reply to:
 Message 138 by Faith, posted 01-01-2016 2:16 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 160 by Faith, posted 01-01-2016 10:44 PM GDR has not replied

  
GDR
Member
Posts: 6202
From: Sidney, BC, Canada
Joined: 05-22-2005
Member Rating: 2.1


(1)
Message 154 of 478 (775435)
01-01-2016 5:45 PM
Reply to: Message 151 by Admin
01-01-2016 5:19 PM


Admin writes:
Maybe you meant atheists? If not then I found this confusing, and others may also.
Thanks Percy. I'll correct it.
While you are here I just want to thank you for this forum. I have benefited tremendously from it, both by hearing what others have to say, and even to see how what I believe sounds by actually having to put it down in writing.
It has been a great education for some one like myself who doesn't have the background and education that many here have.
It is also a very well organized and laid out site with very good moderation.
Thanks again for the gift of this forum and have a great 2016.
Greg

He has told you, O man, what is good ; And what does the LORD require of you But to do justice, to love kindness, And to walk humbly with your God.
Micah 6:8

This message is a reply to:
 Message 151 by Admin, posted 01-01-2016 5:19 PM Admin has seen this message but not replied

  
GDR
Member
Posts: 6202
From: Sidney, BC, Canada
Joined: 05-22-2005
Member Rating: 2.1


Message 157 of 478 (775445)
01-01-2016 9:44 PM
Reply to: Message 155 by kbertsche
01-01-2016 8:12 PM


kbertsche writes:
GDR, I recommend that you look at the thread "Does Atheism = No Beliefs?". You'll see that not all atheists view atheism the same way.
I skimmed through that thread and it is fairly clear that there are varying degrees of atheism. I can however accept the fact that they don't believe in any god or gods and go with that. As an aside I don't believe in naturalism.

He has told you, O man, what is good ; And what does the LORD require of you But to do justice, to love kindness, And to walk humbly with your God.
Micah 6:8

This message is a reply to:
 Message 155 by kbertsche, posted 01-01-2016 8:12 PM kbertsche has not replied

  
GDR
Member
Posts: 6202
From: Sidney, BC, Canada
Joined: 05-22-2005
Member Rating: 2.1


(1)
Message 158 of 478 (775446)
01-01-2016 10:30 PM
Reply to: Message 156 by Bob Bobber
01-01-2016 9:27 PM


Re: misrepresentation
Bob Bobber writes:
Yahweh was being called a murder, I was trying to show that these abnormal beings had to be destroyed with that flood, or we would not be here right now? It is a cool research, start a thread, let's learn.
As a Christian it is my belief that the flood story is to be understood as an allegory and we know there were other flood mythologies at the time and so this is just put a Jewish spin on it. The simplest take away message for the Christian from the story is that God isn't about to give up on us.
However the main point I want to make is this. In the case of the flood we have Yahweh Himself being responsible for the slaughter. In other cases in the OT it has Yahweh commanding the people He has loved to slaughter all men, women and children of another community. This of course makes a mockery of Jesus' command to love our neighbour.
Also however we have to ask what this slaughter would do to the hearts and minds of those carrying out this genocidal slaughter. These are the ones who were commissioned to spread God's love. Just look at what has happened to people in modern history who have come back from the various wars. I had a great Uncle who simply drank himself to death after WW I because he couldn't live with what he had had to face. How much worse would it have been if he had been called to personally, by his own hands kill women and children. Do you believe in a god that would command anyone to do this, let alone the people He has chosen to be His emissaries.
If you actually believe that God is capable of all this I really have to question why it is that you worship Him? Personally I worship God because I firmly believe that He is good all the time, not just some of the time. I worship the God that I see embodied by Jesus who loved the enemy, turned the other cheek and told His followers that the fight was not against people but against evil itself and the weapon against that evil was love. If we fight evil with more evil we know conclusively that evil will always win.

He has told you, O man, what is good ; And what does the LORD require of you But to do justice, to love kindness, And to walk humbly with your God.
Micah 6:8

This message is a reply to:
 Message 156 by Bob Bobber, posted 01-01-2016 9:27 PM Bob Bobber has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 159 by Faith, posted 01-01-2016 10:35 PM GDR has replied
 Message 162 by Bob Bobber, posted 01-01-2016 11:26 PM GDR has replied

  
GDR
Member
Posts: 6202
From: Sidney, BC, Canada
Joined: 05-22-2005
Member Rating: 2.1


Message 161 of 478 (775449)
01-01-2016 10:57 PM
Reply to: Message 159 by Faith
01-01-2016 10:35 PM


Re: misrepresentation
Faith writes:
Loving your neighbor never meant to let sin go unpunished.
That isn't the point here.
Faith writes:
If the Bible is God's word then its account of the Flood is the true one and the others are the embellished and imperfect memories of fallen humanity.
Well is Jesus the "Word" of God or is the Bible the "Word" of God. The Gospel of John tells us that the "Word" became flesh in Jesus. It cannot be both as you cannot reconcile the god of the flood and other atrocities with the God the Father that we see incarnate in the life and words of Jesus. I know that you think you can but the two visions of God are irreconcilable.
Again I go back to the notion that the flood itself is bad enough but the idea that Yahweh would command His followers to slaughter women and children would put Him in the same category as Pol Pot if it were true. And again, why would anyone who hates evil worship a god like that.

He has told you, O man, what is good ; And what does the LORD require of you But to do justice, to love kindness, And to walk humbly with your God.
Micah 6:8

This message is a reply to:
 Message 159 by Faith, posted 01-01-2016 10:35 PM Faith has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 165 by kbertsche, posted 01-02-2016 12:53 AM GDR has replied

  
GDR
Member
Posts: 6202
From: Sidney, BC, Canada
Joined: 05-22-2005
Member Rating: 2.1


Message 167 of 478 (775460)
01-02-2016 2:04 AM
Reply to: Message 165 by kbertsche
01-02-2016 12:53 AM


Re: misrepresentation
lbertschel writes:
Both. Jesus is the LIVING Word of God and Scripture is the WRITTEN Word of God.
Then why are they in disagreement? I'll agree that the Bible is the word of God to the extent that we can learn about Him, and have our hearts touched by Him through the words of the Bible, but not when we read it the way you do.
IMHO your method of understanding scripture provides a warped view of God. Jesus was a Jew who taught His followers through the words of the Hebrew Scriptures, correcting them when necessary but focusing on the aspects that reflected God's true nature which is always loving, kind, just and merciful but never cruel and certainly never genocidal. So yes, we need the OT to understand Jesus in His culture but we need Jesus to separate what is of God and what isn't in the OT.
kbertsche writes:
I agree that there is some tension here, but not that the issue is "irreconcilable". There are a number of approaches to reconciling these things.
But there are none that justify genocide. If it can be justified then how do we know that it isn't God's will that we should nuke into oblivion Islamic countries today? It is because of Jesus that we know it is wrong but with an inerrant Bible we can't know as God was like that then so He very well could be like that again now.
The differences are irreconcilable.
kbertsche writes:
If God really is God, He knows and understands much more than we do. Some of His actions may be difficult for us to understand, and may even seem "wrong". But if we know and trust Him, we can trust that He knows what He's doing here, too.
It isn't God that you are know and trust. Your trust is in an inerrant Bible. IMHO you have made an idol out of the Bible, and again IMHO if you believe that God is capable of genocide and public stonings then I would also humbly suggest that you don't know Him at all.

He has told you, O man, what is good ; And what does the LORD require of you But to do justice, to love kindness, And to walk humbly with your God.
Micah 6:8

This message is a reply to:
 Message 165 by kbertsche, posted 01-02-2016 12:53 AM kbertsche has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 177 by kbertsche, posted 01-02-2016 6:26 AM GDR has not replied

  
GDR
Member
Posts: 6202
From: Sidney, BC, Canada
Joined: 05-22-2005
Member Rating: 2.1


Message 169 of 478 (775463)
01-02-2016 2:16 AM
Reply to: Message 162 by Bob Bobber
01-01-2016 11:26 PM


Re: misrepresentation
Bob Bobber writes:
Turn the other cheek, love your neighbor, cool sayings, but why was Jesus saying those things? You fail to take into account that when it came to Israel’s promised earthly kingdom and the forgiveness of sins by the earthly King of that promised earthly kingdom, what was absolutely essential to that forgiveness being granted? It’s always been the issue of faith down through out history. 

You keep wanting to put things in neat little boxes. Yes it is about faith, but not simply faith in a particular set of doctrines. Read the sermon on the mount or Matthew 25. It is about faith in all that is good so that our hearts respond to love and goodness and ultimately so that is reflected in our lives.
Bob Bobber writes:
It kinda sounds like God is your buddy in the sky, my friend would never do anything evil. Yahweh has done nothing evil, Satan keeps attacking his creation? When it comes to these abnormal beings running around on God’s planet, he has promises he made and Satan will not win the war. Gen. 3:15, this story is written is the stars.
If you want to worship a sometimes genocidal and sometimes cruel god then you are obviously free to do so. What that says to me is that you have turned Christianity inside out and made it all about you. You will worship Him, even though He is capable of evil as it will get you on His good side.
It is actually very similar to the situation with the pagan gods of Jesus' time. People would worship them just because they believed they were god and weren't really concerned with the nature of any of their gods but it was in their best interest to be on the right side of them.

He has told you, O man, what is good ; And what does the LORD require of you But to do justice, to love kindness, And to walk humbly with your God.
Micah 6:8

This message is a reply to:
 Message 162 by Bob Bobber, posted 01-01-2016 11:26 PM Bob Bobber has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 172 by Bob Bobber, posted 01-02-2016 2:50 AM GDR has not replied

  
GDR
Member
Posts: 6202
From: Sidney, BC, Canada
Joined: 05-22-2005
Member Rating: 2.1


Message 180 of 478 (775592)
01-03-2016 2:26 AM
Reply to: Message 173 by Hyroglyphx
01-02-2016 3:36 AM


Re: Can't have it both ways
Hyroglphx writes:
If that's the case then how do you reconcile prophecies? If God doesn't know the future because it's open, then how is it that there are also prophecies all throughout the bible that would have to mean that the future is known to God?
Well, to start with as I you know I do not believe in an inerrant Bible so I allow for some imagination by the authors. Also, if God is going to do something Himself then He would know that ahead of time. Jesus often foretold the destruction of Jerusalem but that would be on the basis of He could see that would be the retribution by the Romans for the rebellion was brewing.
Many of the prophesies that we can see in the Bible are with the benefit of hind sight as well. Frankly, the Jews of that day didn't understand the prophesies the way we do now. It is clear that not even the disciples understood messiahship the way Jesus did. If Jesus had been a military leader defeating their enemies then we would be looking at other biblical verses that would prophesy that.
If God knows all that there is to know then, even though the future is unknowable, He can predict the future with a fair degree of accuracy. As I said earlier, it could easily be predicted that Jesus would be crucified as that would happen to anyone, (particularly someone who had already upset those in power), who was going to do what Jesus did when He entered into Jerusalem.

He has told you, O man, what is good ; And what does the LORD require of you But to do justice, to love kindness, And to walk humbly with your God.
Micah 6:8

This message is a reply to:
 Message 173 by Hyroglyphx, posted 01-02-2016 3:36 AM Hyroglyphx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 181 by Hyroglyphx, posted 01-03-2016 2:39 AM GDR has replied

  
GDR
Member
Posts: 6202
From: Sidney, BC, Canada
Joined: 05-22-2005
Member Rating: 2.1


Message 186 of 478 (775653)
01-03-2016 5:57 PM
Reply to: Message 183 by kbertsche
01-03-2016 7:55 AM


Re: Can't have it both ways
kbertsche writes:
I don't see why this would be a problem.
Further, I believe the argument that this would wipe out free will is fallacious. I can look through the window and see something happen, but this does not mean that I caused or determined it. Likewise, God can look through the window of time and see what will happen in the future, but this does necessarily not mean that He caused or determined it. I don't see how prescience destroys free will. (I think the open theists who make this claim are confusing themselves with the concept of infinity, similar to the math paradoxes that one gets by multiplying and dividing by zero.)
That makes no sense. Using your analogy once God has looked out the window of time, (which in your view is the entire future), and observed you doing something, even before you were ever born, then that action is fixed and you have no free will to deviate from it.

He has told you, O man, what is good ; And what does the LORD require of you But to do justice, to love kindness, And to walk humbly with your God.
Micah 6:8

This message is a reply to:
 Message 183 by kbertsche, posted 01-03-2016 7:55 AM kbertsche has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 188 by kbertsche, posted 01-03-2016 6:30 PM GDR has replied
 Message 193 by Phat, posted 01-04-2016 1:45 AM GDR has replied

  
GDR
Member
Posts: 6202
From: Sidney, BC, Canada
Joined: 05-22-2005
Member Rating: 2.1


Message 187 of 478 (775654)
01-03-2016 6:08 PM
Reply to: Message 181 by Hyroglyphx
01-03-2016 2:39 AM


Re: Can't have it both ways
Hydroglyphx writes:
o, to be clear, you think that Jesus was guesstimating that destruction of the Temple would occur given the Roman occupation?
Jesus spoke out against the militants and with His knowledge of the politics of the time He saw a rebellion at some point in the future to be inevitable. Given the strength of the Romans it then wasn't to difficult to forecast the outcome.
Hydroglphx writes:
So then conceivably this leaves the door open to the possibility that God gets some things wrong?
Not at all. I can say with a coin toss that I have a 50% chance of calling it right. If I then call it heads and tails comes up it wasn't that I was wrong. Actually I was right in saying that I had a 50% chance to get it right.
Again my point is that God knows everything that is knowable but has created a world where the future is open and unknowable.
IMHO both God and I know that my life as I enjoy it now is going to come to an end. Neither of us know when, although I'm sure God has better estimation of that as He would have greater knowledge of my personal health situation.

He has told you, O man, what is good ; And what does the LORD require of you But to do justice, to love kindness, And to walk humbly with your God.
Micah 6:8

This message is a reply to:
 Message 181 by Hyroglyphx, posted 01-03-2016 2:39 AM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
GDR
Member
Posts: 6202
From: Sidney, BC, Canada
Joined: 05-22-2005
Member Rating: 2.1


Message 189 of 478 (775661)
01-03-2016 7:46 PM
Reply to: Message 188 by kbertsche
01-03-2016 6:30 PM


Re: Can't have it both ways
kbertsche writes:
My action is not "fixed" in time until I perform it. God's prescience doesn't "fix" the action. But God can see the future, and knows exactly what I will do even before I do it.
God knows and sees the future just as clearly as He does the past. So I suppose you could say that in God's foreknowledge the entire future is "fixed" in His mind. But we humans cannot see the future. For us, actions are not "fixed" until we perform them.
This seems simple and straightforward to me; I don't see the problem that you have with it.
I get the argument but it makes no sense even from a fundamentalists perspective. Why would God debate with OT characters about things like how many righteous men it takes before He doesn't kill everyone in a village?
From Genesis 18:
quote:
1 The LORD appeared to Abraham near the great trees of Mamre while he was sitting at the entrance to his tent in the heat of the day. 2 Abraham looked up and saw three men standing nearby. When he saw them, he hurried from the entrance of his tent to meet them and bowed low to the ground. 3 He said, "If I have found favor in your eyes, my lord, do not pass your servant by. 4 Let a little water be brought, and then you may all wash your feet and rest under this tree. 5 Let me get you something to eat, so you can be refreshed and then go on your way--now that you have come to your servant." "Very well," they answered, "do as you say." 6 So Abraham hurried into the tent to Sarah. "Quick," he said, "get three seahs of fine flour and knead it and bake some bread." 7 Then he ran to the herd and selected a choice, tender calf and gave it to a servant, who hurried to prepare it. 8 He then brought some curds and milk and the calf that had been prepared, and set these before them. While they ate, he stood near them under a tree. 9 "Where is your wife Sarah?" they asked him. "There, in the tent," he said. 10 Then the LORD said, "I will surely return to you about this time next year, and Sarah your wife will have a son." Now Sarah was listening at the entrance to the tent, which was behind him. 11 Abraham and Sarah were already old and well advanced in years, and Sarah was past the age of childbearing. 12 So Sarah laughed to herself as she thought, "After I am worn out and my master is old, will I now have this pleasure?" 13 Then the LORD said to Abraham, "Why did Sarah laugh and say, 'Will I really have a child, now that I am old?' 14 Is anything too hard for the LORD? I will return to you at the appointed time next year and Sarah will have a son." 15 Sarah was afraid, so she lied and said, "I did not laugh." But he said, "Yes, you did laugh."
Abraham Pleads for Sodom
16 When the men got up to leave, they looked down toward Sodom, and Abraham walked along with them to see them on their way. 17 Then the LORD said, "Shall I hide from Abraham what I am about to do? 18 Abraham will surely become a great and powerful nation, and all nations on earth will be blessed through him. 19 For I have chosen him, so that he will direct his children and his household after him to keep the way of the LORD by doing what is right and just, so that the LORD will bring about for Abraham what he has promised him." 20 Then the LORD said, "The outcry against Sodom and Gomorrah is so great and their sin so grievous 21 that I will go down and see if what they have done is as bad as the outcry that has reached me. If not, I will know." 22 The men turned away and went toward Sodom, but Abraham remained standing before the LORD. 23 Then Abraham approached him and said: "Will you sweep away the righteous with the wicked? 24 What if there are fifty righteous people in the city? Will you really sweep it away and not spare the place for the sake of the fifty righteous people in it? 25 Far be it from you to do such a thing--to kill the righteous with the wicked, treating the righteous and the wicked alike. Far be it from you! Will not the Judge of all the earth do right?" 26 The LORD said, "If I find fifty righteous people in the city of Sodom, I will spare the whole place for their sake." 27 Then Abraham spoke up again: "Now that I have been so bold as to speak to the Lord, though I am nothing but dust and ashes, 28 what if the number of the righteous is five less than fifty? Will you destroy the whole city because of five people?" "If I find forty-five there," he said, "I will not destroy it." 29 Once again he spoke to him, "What if only forty are found there?" He said, "For the sake of forty, I will not do it." 30 Then he said, "May the Lord not be angry, but let me speak. What if only thirty can be found there?" He answered, "I will not do it if I find thirty there." 31 Abraham said, "Now that I have been so bold as to speak to the Lord, what if only twenty can be found there?" He said, "For the sake of twenty, I will not destroy it." 32 Then he said, "May the Lord not be angry, but let me speak just once more. What if only ten can be found there?" He answered, "For the sake of ten, I will not destroy it." 33 When the LORD had finished speaking with Abraham, he left, and Abraham returned home.
This passage points out a couple of problems with your understanding of the Bible. Firstly it has God willing to slaughter a whole village when the God we see in Jesus says to love our enemy. Secondly does this really sound like a god who knows the future.
Is God not capable of creating a universe where He has left the future open even to Him? If God knows the entire future and it is set before we are even born why bother with the Holy Spirit?
Edited by GDR, : No reason given.

He has told you, O man, what is good ; And what does the LORD require of you But to do justice, to love kindness, And to walk humbly with your God.
Micah 6:8

This message is a reply to:
 Message 188 by kbertsche, posted 01-03-2016 6:30 PM kbertsche has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 190 by kbertsche, posted 01-03-2016 8:14 PM GDR has replied
 Message 202 by Phat, posted 01-04-2016 11:36 AM GDR has not replied

  
GDR
Member
Posts: 6202
From: Sidney, BC, Canada
Joined: 05-22-2005
Member Rating: 2.1


Message 191 of 478 (775669)
01-03-2016 8:46 PM
Reply to: Message 190 by kbertsche
01-03-2016 8:14 PM


Re: Can't have it both ways
kbertsche writes:
I agree that this is a difficult passage (as is the one where Moses pleads with God not to destroy the nation). But there are a number of possibilities which you don't seem to consider. For instance, could this be a test of Abraham's character and heart, similar to the command to kill his son?
But that isn't what these passages say, and didn't Jesus teach us to pray, "lead us not into temptation". Besides, the idea of God slaughtering communities, or asking His people to is not uncommon in the OT so there is no reason to suggest that this is anything but what it says.
kbertsche writes:
I believe the future IS open to us (did you mean to say "to Him"?)
I did and it is corrected. Thanks
klbertsche writes:
Again, divine prescience does NOT mean divine determinism. Yes, God knows the entire future. But this does not mean that the entire future is "set" before we are born. It is not "set" until we do it.
If God knows the whole future then He knows what it is you will have for lunch on Jan 23 2019 and that is that. You can change your mind all you want but it will always wind up being predestined from before you were born. How can you argue around that?
kbertsche writes:
I think that you and other open theists have too limited a view of God. I think you are trying to force His actions and knowledge into a human temporal construct.
I am not trying to force anything. I am simply seeking truth through scripture and reason. I have shown how scripture argues against your position and I think it is pretty obvious that reason does as well.
kbertsche writes:
If He is truly the creator, he created time and thus exists outside of it.
OK, but that does not mean that He knows our future in the same way He knows our past and present. If He is truly the creator
then He is quite capable of creating a world where the future is open.
kbertsche writes:
When Jesus said "before Abraham was, I am", he was saying that the human past tense is as the present tense to Him. Expanding on this, I suggest that all time (past, present, future) is as the present tense to God.
That makes no sense. If everything is present tense then there is only "now" that exists which does not allow for change. There would be no present or future. Time is simply the way we experience change.
I go back again. If God knows the entire future why does He send His Holy Spirit to change people's hearts?

He has told you, O man, what is good ; And what does the LORD require of you But to do justice, to love kindness, And to walk humbly with your God.
Micah 6:8

This message is a reply to:
 Message 190 by kbertsche, posted 01-03-2016 8:14 PM kbertsche has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 192 by kbertsche, posted 01-03-2016 11:20 PM GDR has replied

  
GDR
Member
Posts: 6202
From: Sidney, BC, Canada
Joined: 05-22-2005
Member Rating: 2.1


Message 219 of 478 (775750)
01-04-2016 5:17 PM
Reply to: Message 212 by Faith
01-04-2016 3:13 PM


Re: misrepresentation
Faith writes:
This is the way things are. This is Reality, built into the inexorable Moral Law. I'm sorry God didn't see fit to save you.
Matthew 7 1 "Do not judge, or you too will be judged.
Luke 6 37 "Do not judge, and you will not be judged. Do not condemn, and you will not be condemned. Forgive, and you will be forgiven.
Faith you read and understand the Bible strictly through your fundamentalist glasses. Maybe you should try reading to see what it really says.

He has told you, O man, what is good ; And what does the LORD require of you But to do justice, to love kindness, And to walk humbly with your God.
Micah 6:8

This message is a reply to:
 Message 212 by Faith, posted 01-04-2016 3:13 PM Faith has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024