Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,425 Year: 3,682/9,624 Month: 553/974 Week: 166/276 Day: 6/34 Hour: 2/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Neandertal Place in Human Origins
PaulK
Member
Posts: 17825
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 2.2


Message 4 of 7 (77333)
01-09-2004 11:59 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Apostle
01-09-2004 12:43 AM


It seems to me that the actual discussion is mainly about the multi-regional versus the out-of-Africa models rather than about the Neandertals. Either model is compatible with the Neandertals as a subspecies of Homo Sapiens or as a closely related species.
To the best of my knowledge out-of-Africa is by far the dominant model.
While I don't have time to track it down, IIRC there are a few remains that have been identified - perhaps incorrectly - as hybrids between Neandertals and fully modern humans. I would suggest that they would be more important to the question of the position of Neandetals than the multiregional vs out-of-Africa question.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Apostle, posted 01-09-2004 12:43 AM Apostle has not replied

  
PaulK
Member
Posts: 17825
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 2.2


Message 6 of 7 (77825)
01-11-2004 4:24 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by Trixie
01-11-2004 4:07 PM


Re: Hold on, you lot!!!!!
I think most of what you say is pretty much correct.
One little point to remember is the "Cro Magnons" are fully modern humans. In that sense they are "us".
Now if there was interbreeding between fully modern humans and Neandertals then that would tend to support the view that Neandertals should be classified as a subspecies (interfertility is an important consideration in such comparisons even if it is not the only consideration). That does not invalidate the DNA analysis, it is just another factor to consider when making a decision on the taxonomic classification.
I seem to remember some criticisms of the methodology of the mitochondrial DNA studies on this forum. Does anyone else remember any more details ?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by Trixie, posted 01-11-2004 4:07 PM Trixie has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 7 by Trixie, posted 01-11-2004 5:39 PM PaulK has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024