|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,419 Year: 3,676/9,624 Month: 547/974 Week: 160/276 Day: 0/34 Hour: 0/0 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
|
Author | Topic: Quick Questions, Short Answers - No Debate | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 305 days) Posts: 16113 Joined: |
When well separated, black holes behave just as normal gravitating objects. If you squash the Sun down to within its Schwarzschild radius, it will collapse to a black hole, but the Earth will continue to orbit as normal. And if you then squash the Earth down to a black hole, the moon will continue to orbit, without any change. And the Earth-Sun and Earth-Moon Lagrance points will be unaffected. In which case their Lagrange points would not start behaving like black holes. But could you have Lagrange points that did?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 305 days) Posts: 16113 Joined: |
If you are asking whether L4 and L5 could ever have a potential gradient so sharp that it creates a trapped surface and possibly an event horizon, then no, I am fairly sure that could not happen. Yes, that's what I was asking. If it can't happen, then I guess the universe was weird enough already. Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 305 days) Posts: 16113 Joined: |
Unless I'm mistaken, your ranking depends on the rankings of other people, so that your rating might go up as a consequence of me being jeered. Also, I think Percy's formula only takes into account the last n days or posts or something, so your rating might go down as a result of one of your much-admired posts becoming superannuated. So while Percy might be able to implement the feature you describe quite easily, it would not (assuming I'm right) really tell you what you want to know.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 305 days) Posts: 16113 Joined: |
I vaguely remember a story like this, possibly from one of Gould's essays: A sort of organism, I think a shellfish, was once widespread in the fossil record. Then it apparently went extinct --- at least, it went missing from the fossil record. Which was odd, because this variety of shell is still around today. The puzzle was resolved when a specimen was found in the strata from which it was thought to be missing, showing that it hadn't gone extinct, just become scarce and/or localized.
Can anyone name the species and fill in the details for me? Thanks.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 305 days) Posts: 16113 Joined: |
I'm having to write about this for my geology thread. A couple of questions.
(1) Is it true that all radioactive decay involves a change in the atomic number? Is there no decay that just involves an atom spitting out a neutron or two but remaining the same element? (2) If so, is there a reason for this? My own guess is that the instability of nuclei is down to the difficulty of holding together the positively-charged protons, given that like charges repel, but I would be the first to admit that I know nothing about quantum chromodynamics.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 305 days) Posts: 16113 Joined: |
Thanks.
So would it be accurate for me to say that radioactive decay involves any change of the atomic number, the atomic weight, or both --- that by definition it involves a change in the composition of the nucleus?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 305 days) Posts: 16113 Joined:
|
Thanks.
Really I don't know if I'd have started this course on geology if I'd known how hard it would be. I thought I'd be explaining to people: "Sandstone is lithified sand. You wanna guess what mudstone is?" But in fact it has gone on and on and on and on, and now I have to explain nuclear physics to people without myself being a nuclear physicist, and I've written about 80,000 words. I do feel very satisfied with my achievement, but looking back I should probably have tried to achieve something easier.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 305 days) Posts: 16113 Joined: |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 305 days) Posts: 16113 Joined:
|
It's definitely underwater, I found it in an article on underwater photography in which the fnucking idjits who wrote it didn't caption any of the photographs.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 305 days) Posts: 16113 Joined: |
Yes, that's me. What can I do for you?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 305 days) Posts: 16113 Joined: |
You want to meet up?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 305 days) Posts: 16113 Joined: |
Some while back I read a jolly if unprofound short sci-fi story. The basis of the plot was that a guy crash-lands on a tropical-island-paradise planet. He realizes that when the planet is "discovered" by the wider galactic civilization of which he is a citizen, they'll turn it into a tourist resort. He teaches the natives a plan to be passed down from generation to generation to be put into action in case of this eventuality.
Can anyone tell me what it's called and who it's by? Thanks.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 305 days) Posts: 16113 Joined:
|
It is! Thank you! How could I forget the name of Lloyd Biggle Jr?
What's more, the short story version is available free online. Happy day!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 305 days) Posts: 16113 Joined: |
I stumbled across a conceptual problem when caused me to abandon a reply to Faith, and was hoping someone with more genetics knowledge would be able to help. How is it that people can be said to have a specific haplotype at any locus for a mitochondrial gene. You don't only inherit one mitochondrion from your mother, but several. These will presumably accumulate mutations as they go, causing the mitochondria within a single cell to diversify. I can understand a selective sweep homogenising the cell's mitochondria again, but does this happen often enough that there's never time for diversity to establish itself? There are about 100 mitochondria in a human cell. Suppose they were all different (they won't be, that's what we're trying to explain, but suppose they were). They (approximately) double in number and then the cell divides. But there's no reason why each daughter cell should get one copy of each distinct mitochondrion. (Unlike chromosomes, where there's a mechanism for this.) Instead, there's a sort of founder effect every time a cell division takes place. The graph below shows the average behavior of the diversity if we started with 100 mitochondria all different. As you can see even given this starting point we expect the diversity to be completely eliminated after about 400 cell divisions.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 305 days) Posts: 16113 Joined: |
Does it have a name? Thanks.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024