Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,422 Year: 3,679/9,624 Month: 550/974 Week: 163/276 Day: 3/34 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   20 Questions... (from Walt Brown to evolutionists)
johnfolton 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5613 days)
Posts: 2024
Joined: 12-04-2005


Message 14 of 46 (78112)
01-12-2004 9:42 PM


Q19. Careful researchers have found the following inside meteorites: living bacteria, salt crystals, limestone, water, sugars, terrestrial-like brines, and earthlike isotopic patterns. Doesn’t this implicate Earth as their sourceand a powerful launcher, the fountains of the great deep"?
What ever happened to the meterite that scientist assured us came from Mars, how did it get launched from Mars, guess if meterites have bacteria, salt water, limestone, and isotope patterns of earth, likely they were launched from the earth, like the meterite that esteemed scientists assured us came from Mars, etc...
P.S. If scientists feel a rock was launched from Mars, guess its not much of a reach to feel rocks were launched from earth, etc...
Q18: Walt Brown said Eve could of been 6,000 - 7,000 years, think Walt must believe one day to God is a thousand of our years, for if Adam was created on the 6th creation day that would make Eve between 6000-7000 years, I just found that interesting.
[This message has been edited by whatever, 01-12-2004]

Replies to this message:
 Message 15 by Chiroptera, posted 01-12-2004 10:07 PM johnfolton has not replied
 Message 16 by crashfrog, posted 01-12-2004 10:10 PM johnfolton has replied

  
johnfolton 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5613 days)
Posts: 2024
Joined: 12-04-2005


Message 17 of 46 (78122)
01-12-2004 11:01 PM
Reply to: Message 16 by crashfrog
01-12-2004 10:10 PM


I kind of wonder about with the earth travelling 60,000 miles around the sun, with the fountains of the deep erupting continually, they would of only had to launch rocks into a lower orbit, with the waters continually erupting supersonically heated waters upward, over 40 days, would likely to continue to continually press the rocks into orbits farther and farther into increasing orbits, like your talking pretty hot waters, that would of continually pressed outward, etc... with the moon also attracting pulling till rocks escaped, being too small to remain in orbit, on the trailing side, as the earth continued to press on at 60,000 mph, the rocks got left behind, etc...
P.S. This is only a theory, though, perhaps they actually were small enough to have gotten launched and only seem bigger because like a snow ball the water condensated around the rock, but don't the esteemed scientist believe their is dust from the earth on the moon, go figure, if they believe the solar winds can actually cause dust to escape the earth, guess its not much of a reach for water to press upward, pressing outward, pushing rocks into increasing orbits until the size of the rocks were too small to remain in orbit, etc...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by crashfrog, posted 01-12-2004 10:10 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 18 by crashfrog, posted 01-12-2004 11:06 PM johnfolton has replied

  
johnfolton 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5613 days)
Posts: 2024
Joined: 12-04-2005


Message 19 of 46 (78125)
01-12-2004 11:21 PM
Reply to: Message 18 by crashfrog
01-12-2004 11:06 PM


Not if they got launched into a lower orbit, the water would of erupted upward, as it cooled it would of rained back to the earth, the earth wouldn't of over heated, along the pacific antartic & south Indian ridge it would of pressed upward almost continually for 40 days and nights, it would of only need to launch rocks into an initial lower orbit, then it would of continually pressed rocks into increasing orbits, with the moon as another outside force, these rocks eventually got left behind as the earth continued onward, etc...
http://pubs.usgs.gov/publications/text/baseball.html

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by crashfrog, posted 01-12-2004 11:06 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 20 by crashfrog, posted 01-12-2004 11:25 PM johnfolton has replied

  
johnfolton 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5613 days)
Posts: 2024
Joined: 12-04-2005


Message 21 of 46 (78128)
01-12-2004 11:40 PM
Reply to: Message 20 by crashfrog
01-12-2004 11:25 PM


It might be that it was moving 60,000 mph, and got taken over by the suns gravitation, explaining the origin of the asteroid fields, like didn't those scientists bounce voyager off of jupiter, saturn, to sling it in a different direction, think your probably right the rocks tended to want to go straight causing these rocks every orbit to press into increasing orbits, until it eventually went straight as these rocks escaped earths gravitation, explaining the asteroid fields, where the sun recaptured these rocks(another outside force), explaining the location of the asteroid belt, etc...
[This message has been edited by whatever, 01-12-2004]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by crashfrog, posted 01-12-2004 11:25 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 24 by crashfrog, posted 01-12-2004 11:54 PM johnfolton has not replied

  
johnfolton 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5613 days)
Posts: 2024
Joined: 12-04-2005


Message 26 of 46 (78136)
01-13-2004 12:05 AM
Reply to: Message 22 by Asgara
01-12-2004 11:50 PM


What caused the asteroid fields, are the bigger asteroids really solid rock & water, etc...Where did all the water of Mars go, are the asteroid fields just solid rocks center with a frozen water shell, though it does seem they fear one of these will veer out of orbit off jupiters gravitation, where one could actually hit the earth, in fact the bible predicts one of these stars will, etc...
P.S. All the asteroids may not of come from the earth, perhaps some of the bigger ones actually came from Mars, you have scientists finding Martian meteors hitting the earth, etc.. from the believed effects of the gravity of Jupiter veering some of the asteroids into a different orbit, is why these new orbits brings some asteroids to be passing by the earth.
The rocks of the earth would of tended to be wanting to go straight in the direction the earth was moving, prevented these rocks from shooting into the sun, and tending to want to be going straight would of caused them to roll out of the earths gravity and move farther away from the sun, toward the asteroid fields, etc...
[This message has been edited by whatever, 01-13-2004]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by Asgara, posted 01-12-2004 11:50 PM Asgara has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 28 by RRoman, posted 01-13-2004 12:27 PM johnfolton has replied
 Message 31 by JonF, posted 01-13-2004 1:43 PM johnfolton has replied

  
johnfolton 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5613 days)
Posts: 2024
Joined: 12-04-2005


Message 30 of 46 (78226)
01-13-2004 1:36 PM
Reply to: Message 28 by RRoman
01-13-2004 12:27 PM


The wandering stars are the planets, but would include the comets, asteroids for they reflect light, too, they are stars as much as are the planets, etc...
P.S. The bible confirm's that the earth will be hit by one of these stars, that it will have the key to the bottomless pit, the mountains will be leveled, the atmosphere will roll back, men will hide in dens in the earth and in the rocks of the mountains, etc...(kjv Rev 6:12-15 & Rev 9:1-2, 6:13)
If everyone decided to go hide, they must of been warned by the scientists that the earth is going to be hit, these stars(asteroid or comet) coming toward the earth, if they didn't see the stars coming to the earth, why hide in the rocks of the mountains, probably afraid of the waters of the oceans, super mile high waves if they would hit in the ocean, etc...
[This message has been edited by whatever, 01-13-2004]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 28 by RRoman, posted 01-13-2004 12:27 PM RRoman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 36 by RRoman, posted 01-13-2004 4:05 PM johnfolton has not replied

  
johnfolton 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5613 days)
Posts: 2024
Joined: 12-04-2005


Message 32 of 46 (78237)
01-13-2004 2:58 PM
Reply to: Message 31 by JonF
01-13-2004 1:43 PM


JonF, It does appear that Walt agrees with you, that they were only launched from the earth, but not launched to the asteroid belt, he explains how they moved farther from the sun to the asteroid belt, he says their increasing distance from the sun, their present orbit was due to the Radiometer effect, Walt also explained how asteroids can grow in size, due to the waters, acting as a glue to bind the rocks into a larger bodies, and how the comets formed were primarily ice, not having the density of the asteroids, etc...
Center for Scientific Creation – In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood
In Walts google search engine for his site type: The Origin of Asteroids and Meteoroids
Figure 130: The Radiometer Effect. This well-known novelty, called a radiometer, demonstrates the unusual thrust that pushed asteroids into their present orbits. Sunlight warms the dark side of each vane more than the light side. The partial vacuum inside the bulb approaches that found in outer space, so gas molecules travel relatively long distances before striking other molecules. Gas molecules bounce off the hotter, black side with greater velocity than off the colder, white side. This turns the vanes away from the dark side.
[This message has been edited by whatever, 01-13-2004]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 31 by JonF, posted 01-13-2004 1:43 PM JonF has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 35 by JonF, posted 01-13-2004 3:54 PM johnfolton has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024