Author
|
Topic: How does a flood ...
|
starlite
Member (Idle past 2936 days) Posts: 83 Joined: 04-03-2016
|
|
Message 49 of 206 (781407)
04-04-2016 2:06 PM
|
Reply to: Message 47 by Faith 04-04-2016 1:57 PM
|
|
Re: different causes for different layers?
You dun ran across one now.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 47 by Faith, posted 04-04-2016 1:57 PM | | Faith has not replied |
|
starlite
Member (Idle past 2936 days) Posts: 83 Joined: 04-03-2016
|
|
Message 56 of 206 (781433)
04-04-2016 2:35 PM
|
Reply to: Message 54 by Phat 04-04-2016 2:31 PM
|
|
Re: different causes for different layers?
quote: The steps of the scientific method are to: Ask a Question. Do Background Research. Construct a Hypothesis. Test Your Hypothesis by Doing an Experiment. Analyze Your Data and Draw a Conclusion. Communicate Your Results.
So let's see them do that to show Adam would have fossilized!
This message is a reply to: | | Message 54 by Phat, posted 04-04-2016 2:31 PM | | Phat has replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 60 by jar, posted 04-04-2016 2:38 PM | | starlite has replied | | Message 62 by Phat, posted 04-04-2016 2:43 PM | | starlite has replied | | Message 66 by JonF, posted 04-04-2016 2:47 PM | | starlite has replied | | Message 67 by Bliyaal, posted 04-04-2016 2:50 PM | | starlite has replied |
|
starlite
Member (Idle past 2936 days) Posts: 83 Joined: 04-03-2016
|
|
Message 58 of 206 (781435)
04-04-2016 2:37 PM
|
Reply to: Message 55 by JonF 04-04-2016 2:32 PM
|
|
Re: different causes for different layers?
Radiometric dating assumes that the decay we now see happened in the past with no limits. The ratios of parent and daughter isotopes are used to determine how much time it took to produce the daughter by that decay. Anything else? I question your grasp of the sciences you cited. So there.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 55 by JonF, posted 04-04-2016 2:32 PM | | JonF has replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 70 by JonF, posted 04-04-2016 3:01 PM | | starlite has replied | | Message 74 by Coyote, posted 04-04-2016 4:47 PM | | starlite has not replied |
|
starlite
Member (Idle past 2936 days) Posts: 83 Joined: 04-03-2016
|
|
Message 59 of 206 (781436)
04-04-2016 2:38 PM
|
Reply to: Message 57 by jar 04-04-2016 2:36 PM
|
|
Re: different causes for different layers?
You try. Jigs up though. Won't work with me.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 57 by jar, posted 04-04-2016 2:36 PM | | jar has seen this message but not replied |
|
starlite
Member (Idle past 2936 days) Posts: 83 Joined: 04-03-2016
|
|
Message 61 of 206 (781441)
04-04-2016 2:41 PM
|
Reply to: Message 60 by jar 04-04-2016 2:38 PM
|
|
Re: different causes for different layers?
The layers were not all deposited by a flood. Your insult to the bible is noted.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 60 by jar, posted 04-04-2016 2:38 PM | | jar has replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 65 by jar, posted 04-04-2016 2:45 PM | | starlite has replied |
|
starlite
Member (Idle past 2936 days) Posts: 83 Joined: 04-03-2016
|
|
Message 75 of 206 (781484)
04-04-2016 5:08 PM
|
Reply to: Message 62 by Phat 04-04-2016 2:43 PM
|
|
Re: How the heck do people learn to think?
No. It isn't about me.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 62 by Phat, posted 04-04-2016 2:43 PM | | Phat has not replied |
|
starlite
Member (Idle past 2936 days) Posts: 83 Joined: 04-03-2016
|
|
Message 76 of 206 (781485)
04-04-2016 5:09 PM
|
Reply to: Message 70 by JonF 04-04-2016 3:01 PM
|
|
Re: different causes for different layers?
Apparently decay is off topic.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 70 by JonF, posted 04-04-2016 3:01 PM | | JonF has not replied |
|
starlite
Member (Idle past 2936 days) Posts: 83 Joined: 04-03-2016
|
|
Message 77 of 206 (781486)
04-04-2016 5:11 PM
|
Reply to: Message 63 by JonF 04-04-2016 2:43 PM
|
|
Re: different causes for different layers?
Well carbon 14 is one type of radioactive decay. However I won't destroy your claims here since it is off topic.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 63 by JonF, posted 04-04-2016 2:43 PM | | JonF has not replied |
|
starlite
Member (Idle past 2936 days) Posts: 83 Joined: 04-03-2016
|
|
Message 78 of 206 (781487)
04-04-2016 5:15 PM
|
Reply to: Message 65 by jar 04-04-2016 2:45 PM
|
|
[/quote]
quote: There is no such thing as "The Bible"
This is not a thread on humor, sorry. I see lots of bibles for sale.
quote:
Topic. Can we get a post that is on topic?
Yes, someone mentioned layers and the life fossilized in them. I mentioned that this involved assuming and believing nature was the same and therefore all life would be represented by what could fossilize. I have no reason to believe that man or most animals would or could have fossilzed. It seems to be a bare assertion to claim they could! Edited by starlite, : No reason given. Edited by starlite, : No reason given.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 65 by jar, posted 04-04-2016 2:45 PM | | jar has not replied |
|
starlite
Member (Idle past 2936 days) Posts: 83 Joined: 04-03-2016
|
|
Message 79 of 206 (781488)
04-04-2016 5:17 PM
|
Reply to: Message 66 by JonF 04-04-2016 2:47 PM
|
|
Re: different causes for different layers?
So how would we know if man existed if there can be no remains? After all God said to dust Adam would return, not to fossilized remains. Edited by starlite, : No reason given.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 66 by JonF, posted 04-04-2016 2:47 PM | | JonF has not replied |
|
starlite
Member (Idle past 2936 days) Posts: 83 Joined: 04-03-2016
|
|
Message 80 of 206 (781489)
04-04-2016 5:17 PM
|
Reply to: Message 67 by Bliyaal 04-04-2016 2:50 PM
|
|
Re: different causes for different layers?
Any man or lion then?
This message is a reply to: | | Message 67 by Bliyaal, posted 04-04-2016 2:50 PM | | Bliyaal has not replied |
|
starlite
Member (Idle past 2936 days) Posts: 83 Joined: 04-03-2016
|
|
Message 81 of 206 (781490)
04-04-2016 5:22 PM
|
Reply to: Message 70 by JonF 04-04-2016 3:01 PM
|
|
[/quote]
quote: Nope, it's a conclusion. We have lots of evidence that radioactive decay was constant in the past. Radioactive decay involves deeply fundamental properties of the universe and any significant change would leave many widespread traces in the present.
Name one solid piece of evidence?
quote:
Plus the fact that enough AND to make YEC possible would have melted at least the surface of the Earth and killed every living thing, including those on any ark, from radiation inside their bodies.
Explain what you mean exactly.
quote: The RATE group acknowledges this, and has no solution. See Heat and radiation destroy claims of accelerated nuclear decay
?? Did I claim ANY decay, let alone accelerated?? Can you prove that assertion?
quote:
Most (definitely not all) radiometric dating involves measuring the ratio of parent to daughter and other significant measurements and facts.
I agree. However what that measure really represents is the issue.
quote: Since it's obvious that all you know about radiometric dating is some vague notion of parent/daughter ratios, your questioning is of no significance.
Hey just because I mention something in a sentence doesn't mean that is all I know. Edited by Admin, : Fix first quote. Edited by starlite, : No reason given.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 70 by JonF, posted 04-04-2016 3:01 PM | | JonF has replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 82 by Admin, posted 04-04-2016 5:39 PM | | starlite has not replied | | Message 90 by JonF, posted 04-05-2016 8:37 AM | | starlite has not replied |
|
starlite
Member (Idle past 2936 days) Posts: 83 Joined: 04-03-2016
|
Re: Has YEC Changed That Much?
No. I don't pay much attention to all that. Thanks. Would you not agree that believers ought to look for some better explanation than a single flood for all the geologic record? Edited by starlite, : No reason given.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 83 by Dr Adequate, posted 04-04-2016 10:02 PM | | Dr Adequate has replied |
|