Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 65 (9077 total)
103 online now:
CosmicChimp, nwr, Percy (Admin) (3 members, 100 visitors)
Newest Member: Contrarian
Post Volume: Total: 894,047 Year: 5,159/6,534 Month: 2/577 Week: 70/135 Day: 1/1 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   On the Origin of Life and Falsifiability
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 326 days)
Posts: 16112
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 101 of 108 (784168)
05-13-2016 12:28 PM
Reply to: Message 100 by Genomicus
05-13-2016 10:15 AM


But I'm not sure that this is Popper's sense. I understood him to be talking about hypotheses which are so constructed that no acquisition of data would cause one to abandon them; not merely hypotheses where we are presently unable to acquire the data.

Otherwise, as I have pointed out, we would have to say that people constructing apparatus to test a hypothesis for the first time were expending their money and effort on researching a hypothesis which was not even properly constructed. People building the large hadron collider, for example, to look for the Higgs boson, were trying to investigate something which was not even a properly constructed scientific hypothesis, and wouldn't be until they turned it on, when suddenly the nature of the hypothesis would change: it would become properly constructed at the same time that the large hadron collider was.

But, as I understand Popper, it was already properly constructed: they could say what data would confirm or disprove the existence of the Higgs boson, and so they set out to acquire the data.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 100 by Genomicus, posted 05-13-2016 10:15 AM Genomicus has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 104 by Genomicus, posted 05-15-2016 1:27 AM Dr Adequate has replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 326 days)
Posts: 16112
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 105 of 108 (784249)
05-15-2016 8:44 AM
Reply to: Message 104 by Genomicus
05-15-2016 1:27 AM


Well, we'd need to know more about RNA. We could follow up on the work of Bernhardt, Kurland, and Harish & Caetano-Anoll├ęs.

Do you have any ideas as to how we could test if FUCA was capable of surviving space travel?


This message is a reply to:
 Message 104 by Genomicus, posted 05-15-2016 1:27 AM Genomicus has seen this message

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022