Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 66 (9078 total)
114 online now:
AZPaul3, dwise1, Percy (Admin), Tanypteryx, Taq (5 members, 109 visitors)
Newest Member: harveyspecter
Post Volume: Total: 895,206 Year: 6,318/6,534 Month: 511/650 Week: 49/232 Day: 26/23 Hour: 1/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Describing what the Biblical Flood would be like.
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 8971
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 7 of 242 (788437)
07-31-2016 4:43 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by jar
07-31-2016 1:53 PM


Flow Volume and Flow Rate
1000 cubic meters per second could be a LOT more than 80/sec of velocity or it could be a LOT less. They aren't the same thing.

Let's say the river is 100m wide and an average of 10 meters deep. The 2,000 cubic meters per second (the Rhine) give a velocity of 2 m/sec.

The maximum mean velocity measured
with the ADCP was 3.7 m/s. The pitot-static tube, while capable of only point
measurements, quantified velocity 0.39 m below the surface. The maximum mean velocity measured with the pitot tube was 5.2 m/s, with instantaneous velocities up to 6.5 m/s.

from: http://water.usgs.gov/...s/2009/magril_gartner_etal_2009.pdf

The next question is can water flow at 10's of meters per second.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by jar, posted 07-31-2016 1:53 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 8 by jar, posted 07-31-2016 4:52 PM NosyNed has replied

  
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 8971
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 9 of 242 (788441)
07-31-2016 5:54 PM
Reply to: Message 8 by jar
07-31-2016 4:52 PM


Flow Rate
Over 200 m/s? Ha, try letting it fall from the height of the moon.

The paper (which I only glanced at) suggest Coriolis forces could spin up the water I guess. But I have a suspicion there is a limit to that too.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by jar, posted 07-31-2016 4:52 PM jar has not replied

  
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 8971
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 111 of 242 (788711)
08-04-2016 1:27 AM
Reply to: Message 109 by Faith
08-03-2016 9:50 PM


super genome
increased heterozygosity is cdompletely within the normal range of things

No, it is not.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 109 by Faith, posted 08-03-2016 9:50 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 119 by Faith, posted 08-04-2016 10:23 AM NosyNed has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022