Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 68 (9079 total)
107 online now:
Minnemooseus (Adminnemooseus), PaulK (2 members, 105 visitors)
Newest Member: harveyspecter
Post Volume: Total: 895,332 Year: 6,444/6,534 Month: 637/650 Week: 175/232 Day: 0/8 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Describing what the Biblical Flood would be like.
PaulK
Member
Posts: 17181
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 2.5


Message 92 of 242 (788658)
08-03-2016 11:06 AM
Reply to: Message 90 by Faith
08-03-2016 10:51 AM


Re: On some pre-flood environment
I have a question Faith. How can you not know that what you say is a reversal of the truth ? You know perfectly well that you want the evidence ignored and suppressed. You even "pitied" William Smith for reporting his discovery of the order in the fossil record.

Obviously you know that the evidence does not support you.

In reality it is Flood geology that is ridiculous.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 90 by Faith, posted 08-03-2016 10:51 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 93 by Faith, posted 08-03-2016 11:33 AM PaulK has replied

  
PaulK
Member
Posts: 17181
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 2.5


Message 94 of 242 (788660)
08-03-2016 11:38 AM
Reply to: Message 93 by Faith
08-03-2016 11:33 AM


Re: On some pre-flood environment
quote:

What I pitied him for was believing in the Old Earth, not for the order of the fossils.

Did he ? His beliefs on the age of the Earth don't seem to be discussed much, so I can't say. But I do know that in the context of the discussion he was specifically cited for discovering and reporting the order in the fossil record.

quote:

And the rest of your post is the usual "reversal of the truth."

Oh, please Faith. You know better than that.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 93 by Faith, posted 08-03-2016 11:33 AM Faith has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 96 by jar, posted 08-03-2016 11:56 AM PaulK has not replied

  
PaulK
Member
Posts: 17181
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 2.5


Message 127 of 242 (788773)
08-04-2016 2:13 PM
Reply to: Message 124 by Faith
08-04-2016 12:50 PM


Re: Just more straw man debunkery
quote:

Oh nonsense. A working model for a worldwide FLOOD doesn't need to explain the order of the fossils. Why on earth would that be required of a FLOOD for pete's sake?

It would be required if the person providing the model were to claim that the fossil record was "terrific" evidence of the flood. If the flood cannot even account for the evidence that supposedly supports it then it is obviously false.

I know that you'll claim that you don't cite the order of the fossil record as evidence - but that order is so pervasive a feature of the fossil record that any model that cannot account for it cannot account for the fossil record at all.

quote:

The point is you can never have the SCIENTIFIC CERTAINTY about the past that you have in the hard sciences.

In any science there is a variation in the degrees of certainty. In experimental science it is usually expressed in statistical terms. And so it is with geology and palaeontology. We may be certain that the Earth is very old - even if we cannot work it out exactly we may be sure that it is far, far older than YEC views allow.. We mat be certain that the strata and the fossils were not produced by a catastrophic flood - as these discussions should be making very, very obvious.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 124 by Faith, posted 08-04-2016 12:50 PM Faith has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022