Darwin Storm
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 2 of 19 (7893)
03-27-2002 3:06 AM
|
|
|
Well , you know that dang theory led Medel to research allele combinations in plants, hereditary traits ect . Course, science progressed, in the fifties, searching for the mechanism for passing on hereditary traits ( as required and predicited by TOE) , scientists found the amazing bundle of chemicals called DNA. Hmmmm, course, not like understanding how DNA works, or the mapping of the human genome is important. And those are merely some of the plethora of wrong headed avenues of research that science has gone down due to that blasted theory of evolution. I could think up of more reasons why TOE is harmfull to science (like almost all of modern biology), but I must say that whole genetics thing seems to be the worst.
|
Darwin Storm
Inactive Member
|
TC, you realize that most of the people who accept TOE are religious? I think that perhaps the most offensive thing I have heard from some creationists is that if someone accepts the evidence for TOE, the must not be a good christian. (Hovind did that repeatidly in his sermons that I watched.) There are alot of people who aren't christians that accept TOE, but there are also alot of christians who accept TOE as well. Seems the stumbling block here isn't relgion, but a literal interpretation of the bible.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 9 by TrueCreation, posted 03-28-2002 4:47 PM | | TrueCreation has not replied |
|
Darwin Storm
Inactive Member
|
TC, did you teacher in highschool tell you there was no god because of TOE? If so, that teacher should be fired. However, in the biology classes I have taken in both highschool and and college, there was never a discussion or opionon of religion brought up in class. The only thing we discussed in talking about TOE was the evidence for it, its impact and influence on biology, and how those effects have influences on genetics.
|