Case against Kim Davis dismissed

When you hold public office, you are duty bound to to act impartially. No one is saying she isn't free to hold her beliefs or even the right to protest. But in the end the only solution is that she either complies or she finds employment elsewhere. I hold public office and there is plenty of policies and laws that I find disagreeable... But my feelings on the matter are irrelevant to the performance of my duties.And you know, people would probably respect her a lot more if she simply resigned because they conflicted with her core moral beliefs. Instead she demands that the system kowtow to her. You cannot lump the two together because one is public office and the other is a private enterprise. You're absolutely right about the baker reserving the right to refuse service, but Davis is a government employee. Edited by Hyroglyphx, : No reason given.

So is getting married three separate times without it involving death or infidelity, which is the case with the philandering Kim Davis. But don't let that get in the way of a good moral defense, aye "Woe to you, Pharisees! You hypocrites!" - Jesus of Nazareth

So then this is about religious convictions... We can assume then it would be acceptable for Jews or Muslims in public office to stone women on their periods then?

I'll bet you never speak in the church either, as Paul, through Almighty God, has commanded. Not that any of this is relevant to the conversation.