Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,890 Year: 4,147/9,624 Month: 1,018/974 Week: 345/286 Day: 1/65 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Why did we stop inventing gods?
Phat
Member
Posts: 18348
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 94 of 203 (789546)
08-16-2016 1:05 PM
Reply to: Message 91 by Greatest I am
08-16-2016 12:54 PM


Re: Universalist Gnostic Christian church
GIA writes:
Phat
You asked more than once as to what I would change in terms of what people believe when I gave you the answer in the link I gave you.
Perhaps you were too busy worrying about my formatting.
Let me give it again.
What is God? - Big Think
Regards
DL
You seem to respect Karen Armstrong. She discusses Logos vs Mythos and also articulates the need for morality in global spirituality...much as you do. Her bio is brief:
quote:
Born in England in 1944, Karen Armstrong is a TED Prize-winning scholar of comparative religion best known for her bestselling 1993 volume "A History of God." A Catholic nun from 1962 through 1969, she left the order to become a student of English literature at Oxford amidst a struggle with then-undiagnosed epilepsy, a period of her life discussed in her 2004 autobiography "The Spiral Staircase." In 2008 she called for a council of world religious leaders to draw up a "Charter for Compassion" based on the moral principles embodied in the Golden Rule. In November 2009, she unveiled the Charter in Washington, DC and online.
I have not studied whether she believes in God or Jesus as something we humans are in communion with yet Who are of a higher archetype than we are or whether we all are the only gods we will ever know---as you believe. Still...you have shown us a link but have not articulated why you believe that God is so darn mean. I do not see this in my relationship with Him. Perhaps you want us all to stop believing that God is apart from us in nature and that we all can be gods.

Chance as a real force is a myth. It has no basis in reality and no place in scientific inquiry. For science and philosophy to continue to advance in knowledge, chance must be demythologized once and for all. —RC Sproul
"A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." —Mark Twain "
~"If that's not sufficient for you go soak your head."~Faith

This message is a reply to:
 Message 91 by Greatest I am, posted 08-16-2016 12:54 PM Greatest I am has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 101 by Greatest I am, posted 08-16-2016 1:23 PM Phat has seen this message but not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18348
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 96 of 203 (789548)
08-16-2016 1:09 PM
Reply to: Message 93 by ringo
08-16-2016 12:58 PM


Re: testable versus untestable.
ringo writes:
I can testify that Bigfoot is sitting on my couch. How much is that testimony worth?
Tell us more details! A testimony is only worth as much as the credibility of the author. People rarely gain credibility without being known.
So you attribute your gambling problem to God testing you? And being fired as God testing you? What a Bastard.
I do not blame god for my gambling problem--it was my addiction and my responsibility. I was simply too weak to confront it because i have long preferred fantasy over reality. Getting fired was reality. I don't blame God for that, either.

Chance as a real force is a myth. It has no basis in reality and no place in scientific inquiry. For science and philosophy to continue to advance in knowledge, chance must be demythologized once and for all. —RC Sproul
"A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." —Mark Twain "
~"If that's not sufficient for you go soak your head."~Faith

This message is a reply to:
 Message 93 by ringo, posted 08-16-2016 12:58 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 99 by ringo, posted 08-16-2016 1:17 PM Phat has replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18348
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 98 of 203 (789550)
08-16-2016 1:13 PM
Reply to: Message 95 by Greatest I am
08-16-2016 1:07 PM


Re: testable versus untestable.
Lets first correct this sloppy formatting, shall we?
GIA writes:
Phat writes:
I was changed forever when I publicly confessed that Jesus is Lord...
Having a Lord or master indicates that you think of yourself as a serf or slave.
Why would you slave yourself to a genocidal god who always seems to kill when he could just as easily cure those he thinks ill?
Regards
DL
Accepting Jesus as Lord means that you dont consider yourself more highly than you ought, for one thing. Humans are not gods. Humans will never solve their global,ethical, or personal problems through their own strength alone. Moreover, God considers us as sons--not slaves.

Chance as a real force is a myth. It has no basis in reality and no place in scientific inquiry. For science and philosophy to continue to advance in knowledge, chance must be demythologized once and for all. —RC Sproul
"A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." —Mark Twain "
~"If that's not sufficient for you go soak your head."~Faith

This message is a reply to:
 Message 95 by Greatest I am, posted 08-16-2016 1:07 PM Greatest I am has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 102 by Greatest I am, posted 08-16-2016 1:26 PM Phat has replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18348
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 100 of 203 (789552)
08-16-2016 1:18 PM
Reply to: Message 97 by Greatest I am
08-16-2016 1:12 PM


Re: Judging The Judge
Again, GIA we have to correct this formatting as it is unclear what is being said by whom. Correct me if I am wrong. Essentially you are saying:
Phat,to GIA writes:
the only evidence you have is what has been written by others. You cannot claim to know God so how can you judge Gods supposed actions without hearing from the defendant Himself?
GIA writes:
Further the only knowledge you have of god is what has been written by others. You cannot claim to know God so how can you judge Gods supposed actions without hearing from the defendant Himself?
Regards
DL

Chance as a real force is a myth. It has no basis in reality and no place in scientific inquiry. For science and philosophy to continue to advance in knowledge, chance must be demythologized once and for all. —RC Sproul
"A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." —Mark Twain "
~"If that's not sufficient for you go soak your head."~Faith

This message is a reply to:
 Message 97 by Greatest I am, posted 08-16-2016 1:12 PM Greatest I am has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 105 by Greatest I am, posted 08-16-2016 1:31 PM Phat has seen this message but not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18348
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 103 of 203 (789555)
08-16-2016 1:27 PM
Reply to: Message 99 by ringo
08-16-2016 1:17 PM


Re: testable versus untestable.
ringo writes:
So how credible is your testimony when you've been kicking your habit (presumably with God's help) for years?
My testimony is honest. How credible it is is your call.
ringo writes:
You're the one who brought up Job. He wasn't responsible for causing his problems but he was responsible for dealing with them. God didn't help him with that.
We don't know whether God helped Job or not. Jobs assets and family were restored..the book does not say how, though we can surmise that Job simply got remarried and made more babies. How did he become rich again?

Chance as a real force is a myth. It has no basis in reality and no place in scientific inquiry. For science and philosophy to continue to advance in knowledge, chance must be demythologized once and for all. —RC Sproul
"A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." —Mark Twain "
~"If that's not sufficient for you go soak your head."~Faith

This message is a reply to:
 Message 99 by ringo, posted 08-16-2016 1:17 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 106 by Greatest I am, posted 08-16-2016 1:33 PM Phat has replied
 Message 115 by ringo, posted 08-17-2016 11:37 AM Phat has seen this message but not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18348
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 104 of 203 (789556)
08-16-2016 1:30 PM
Reply to: Message 102 by Greatest I am
08-16-2016 1:26 PM


Is God A Meanie?
Why would you slave yourself to a genocidal god who always seems to kill when he could just as easily cure those he thinks ill?
First of all, I do not see God as genocidal. Second, I am not slaving myself. I am willfully obedient, but I have a free will. I am not chained to any religion. Lastly, why doesn't God simply cure everybody? Well for that matter why doesn't God tie our shoes, go to work for us, and feed us directly from spoon to mouth? I believe He certainly could, if he wanted us to eternally remain babies.

Chance as a real force is a myth. It has no basis in reality and no place in scientific inquiry. For science and philosophy to continue to advance in knowledge, chance must be demythologized once and for all. —RC Sproul
"A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." —Mark Twain "
~"If that's not sufficient for you go soak your head."~Faith

This message is a reply to:
 Message 102 by Greatest I am, posted 08-16-2016 1:26 PM Greatest I am has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 107 by Greatest I am, posted 08-16-2016 1:36 PM Phat has seen this message but not replied
 Message 108 by Greatest I am, posted 08-16-2016 1:38 PM Phat has seen this message but not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18348
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 110 of 203 (789567)
08-16-2016 3:36 PM
Reply to: Message 106 by Greatest I am
08-16-2016 1:33 PM


Human Responsibility vs Gods Responsibility
GIA writes:
My question on this is, --- your god created your nature. Why did he put that addictive nature in you knowing that you could not resist following your god given nature?
Seems like a set up to me.
God created us as freewilled creatures with autonomous natures. We were not born addicted---though some may argue we were born addicted to sin.
Phat writes:
Jobs assets and family were restored...
GIA writes:
Can the pain of losing a child be erased by having another child?
No. Job suffered pain. God did not directly cause that pain though by allowing satan to do it,critics could argue that God was responsible.
So again the question: If God could prevent pain and suffering in our lives, why does He not?
I maintain that reality is. There are days we will experience pain. There are days we will suffer.
And about Noahs flood....what does the evidence show us concerning such an event? Can we hold God responsible for a story in a book that was written by humans? Seems to me if anything it is humans whom we should indict.

Chance as a real force is a myth. It has no basis in reality and no place in scientific inquiry. For science and philosophy to continue to advance in knowledge, chance must be demythologized once and for all. —RC Sproul
"A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." —Mark Twain "
~"If that's not sufficient for you go soak your head."~Faith

This message is a reply to:
 Message 106 by Greatest I am, posted 08-16-2016 1:33 PM Greatest I am has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 122 by Greatest I am, posted 09-07-2016 2:05 PM Phat has replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18348
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 113 of 203 (789573)
08-16-2016 5:56 PM
Reply to: Message 92 by Tangle
08-16-2016 12:57 PM


Re: testable versus untestable.
Tangle writes:
I don't want anyone dicking with my head except me.

You are delightfully honest.
Tangle writes:
There's absolutely nothing new to be found in the bible. It's been exactly the same for 2,000 years. I studied it for years and believed in it the same way you do now. It was my world view - been there, done that.
See...I find new wisdom nearly every day. Reading it is one thing. Applying it is another.
Tangle writes:
The mistake that you and your chums continually make is to assume that by seemingly being clever, other people can know something they don't about this god thing. No-one, that's no-one, has any special knowledge of god; not those on my side - Dawkins, Hawking etc or those on yours - the pope and that charleton favourite of GDR's, C S Lewis. They're all as clueless as you and I.
Perhaps they dont have special knowledge, but I would argue that many get insights that you or I might not yet understand. What you and your chums fail o realize is that God is living and active...as is the Word. Of course, you insist on evidence, as if the evidence isnt evident already. I can't convince you...thats for sure.

Chance as a real force is a myth. It has no basis in reality and no place in scientific inquiry. For science and philosophy to continue to advance in knowledge, chance must be demythologized once and for all. —RC Sproul
"A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." —Mark Twain "
~"If that's not sufficient for you go soak your head."~Faith

This message is a reply to:
 Message 92 by Tangle, posted 08-16-2016 12:57 PM Tangle has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 114 by Tangle, posted 08-16-2016 6:19 PM Phat has replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18348
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 116 of 203 (789642)
08-17-2016 12:39 PM
Reply to: Message 114 by Tangle
08-16-2016 6:19 PM


Conning Vince
Tangle writes:
If you believe it, you apply it. There's no choice. Are you suggesting that when I believed it, I didn't?
You likely saw no evidence. Being a man of reason...logic reason and reality were something tangible to you...so you changed your worldview.
I have seen subjective evidence of the supernatural and I have also witnessed dramatic transformations in other peoples lives. People may claim it happens to everyone--not just believers---but I have yet to see it outside of my box.
Tangle writes:
All you can do is assert it and hope. You have absolutely nothing else.
Again, yes I do. I have had personal experience. You may claim that you did also, but I doubt it. Not at the level I had, at any rate.
Tangle writes:
if the evidence was evident you wouldn't have to convince me would you?
You have already convinced yourself that God does not exist, so I would have to unconvince you...which it is doubtful I can do.
Tangle writes:
I live and breathe evidence, I will change my mind. I don't have a book that makes sure that I can't.
Thats good to hear. We will take this one day at a time. Until then, I hope that you have a good life.

Chance as a real force is a myth. It has no basis in reality and no place in scientific inquiry. For science and philosophy to continue to advance in knowledge, chance must be demythologized once and for all. —RC Sproul
"A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." —Mark Twain "
~"If that's not sufficient for you go soak your head."~Faith

This message is a reply to:
 Message 114 by Tangle, posted 08-16-2016 6:19 PM Tangle has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 117 by Tangle, posted 08-17-2016 5:17 PM Phat has seen this message but not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18348
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


(1)
Message 121 of 203 (789812)
08-19-2016 11:58 PM
Reply to: Message 120 by LamarkNewAge
08-19-2016 6:14 PM


Re: GIA on Gnostic Christians.
Please stop dragging this thread off topic.

Chance as a real force is a myth. It has no basis in reality and no place in scientific inquiry. For science and philosophy to continue to advance in knowledge, chance must be demythologized once and for all. —RC Sproul
"A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." —Mark Twain "
~"If that's not sufficient for you go soak your head."~Faith

This message is a reply to:
 Message 120 by LamarkNewAge, posted 08-19-2016 6:14 PM LamarkNewAge has not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18348
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 125 of 203 (790908)
09-07-2016 7:14 PM
Reply to: Message 122 by Greatest I am
09-07-2016 2:05 PM


Re: Human Responsibility vs Gods Responsibility
Only a lost mind that knows nothing of justice would say that the hit-man is responsible and exonerate the Don who paid him for the hit.
Except that in this context, the hit-man was complaining that Job was doing well..in fact was jealous that Job was so blessed and wanted to make the hit. The Don merely refused to exterminate the hit-man at that point. I suppose that we could argue that God is responsible for everything that satan does...but God never directly created an evil satan. God allowed the possibility of evil and Lucifer chose it...actualizing his purpose. Thus the hit man chose to become a hit man.
I suppose you could blame God for everything...thus gnostically wanting to be your own god. You could, in effect, be your own hit man!
The whole argument on free will, determinism, illusion of free will, etc... hinges on the basic idea that God has no right to know what we have not yet chosen.
Ye shall be as gods. (Leave us the f*ck alone, Big Guy and let us actualize our own destiny!!)

Chance as a real force is a myth. It has no basis in reality and no place in scientific inquiry. For science and philosophy to continue to advance in knowledge, chance must be demythologized once and for all. —RC Sproul
"A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." —Mark Twain "
~"If that's not sufficient for you go soak your head."~Faith

This message is a reply to:
 Message 122 by Greatest I am, posted 09-07-2016 2:05 PM Greatest I am has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 127 by jar, posted 09-07-2016 7:35 PM Phat has replied
 Message 133 by Greatest I am, posted 09-09-2016 9:58 AM Phat has not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18348
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 126 of 203 (790909)
09-07-2016 7:17 PM
Reply to: Message 124 by frako
09-07-2016 6:12 PM


Re: Human Responsibility vs Gods Responsibility
Its like a potter with clay. So you choose to smush a few pieces back into the ball and start over? Clay is just clay....and humans are just humans...More of them can always be made. Who are we to b*tch at our Potter? (jar would argue that we not only have a right but a responsibility to set the potter straight!)

Chance as a real force is a myth. It has no basis in reality and no place in scientific inquiry. For science and philosophy to continue to advance in knowledge, chance must be demythologized once and for all. —RC Sproul
"A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." —Mark Twain "
~"If that's not sufficient for you go soak your head."~Faith

This message is a reply to:
 Message 124 by frako, posted 09-07-2016 6:12 PM frako has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 131 by ringo, posted 09-08-2016 11:53 AM Phat has seen this message but not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18348
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 128 of 203 (790923)
09-08-2016 12:28 AM
Reply to: Message 127 by jar
09-07-2016 7:35 PM


Re: Human Responsibility vs Gods Responsibility
the God character directly forbids Adam and Eve from acquiring the knowledge needed to know to obey
Thats not what the knowledge was, though...thats your interpretation of what it was. In addition, you claim the snake told the truth when the Bible clearly tells us that there is no truth in satan.
God told them that they would surely die. He never stated if it was a physical death or a spiritual death.
Sometimes in your quest for literal reading you end up interpreting a message in a way that it was not intended to be told. You are not helping people by glorifying the snake and demonizing God.

Chance as a real force is a myth. It has no basis in reality and no place in scientific inquiry. For science and philosophy to continue to advance in knowledge, chance must be demythologized once and for all. —RC Sproul
"A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." —Mark Twain "
~"If that's not sufficient for you go soak your head."~Faith

This message is a reply to:
 Message 127 by jar, posted 09-07-2016 7:35 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 129 by Asgara, posted 09-08-2016 1:49 AM Phat has seen this message but not replied
 Message 130 by jar, posted 09-08-2016 8:32 AM Phat has replied
 Message 134 by Greatest I am, posted 09-09-2016 10:04 AM Phat has seen this message but not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18348
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 142 of 203 (791120)
09-11-2016 8:01 AM
Reply to: Message 140 by ringo
09-10-2016 11:44 AM


Big Guy please report to the lab...
ringo writes:
If the concept of God could be tested, there wouldn't be thousands of competing concepts.
Very true.
One sticking point in our arguments is the idea that evidence is required.
How do we gather evidence for God? The only evidence we have is that believers claim that God is evident. In other words, belief is our only evidence.
And you want tests, as if we can ask Him to come down for a moment....oh wait...He already has!

Chance as a real force is a myth. It has no basis in reality and no place in scientific inquiry. For science and philosophy to continue to advance in knowledge, chance must be demythologized once and for all. —RC Sproul
"A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." —Mark Twain "
~"If that's not sufficient for you go soak your head."~Faith

This message is a reply to:
 Message 140 by ringo, posted 09-10-2016 11:44 AM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 144 by Greatest I am, posted 09-11-2016 11:06 AM Phat has seen this message but not replied
 Message 146 by ringo, posted 09-11-2016 2:28 PM Phat has seen this message but not replied
 Message 147 by Diomedes, posted 09-12-2016 3:39 PM Phat has seen this message but not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18348
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 143 of 203 (791121)
09-11-2016 8:04 AM
Reply to: Message 141 by Greatest I am
09-10-2016 11:49 AM


Re: Human Responsibility vs Gods Responsibility
GIA writes:
Human sacrifice is evil and God demanding one and accepting one is evil.
Why is it evil to provide the sacrifice?
And how can someone who believes that we are the only gods there will ever be even try in the same breath to indict God?
You may say you are not indicting God (since you don't believe in Him) but rather organized religion. So I think I understand your argument and passion.
Here is a question for you: If you believe that we are the only gods there will ever be, would you not also say that we are the only devils there will ever be?
If so, how do we become a unified and peaceful world? How do we get rid of the devil within us?
Edited by Phat, : added features

Chance as a real force is a myth. It has no basis in reality and no place in scientific inquiry. For science and philosophy to continue to advance in knowledge, chance must be demythologized once and for all. —RC Sproul
"A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." —Mark Twain "
~"If that's not sufficient for you go soak your head."~Faith

This message is a reply to:
 Message 141 by Greatest I am, posted 09-10-2016 11:49 AM Greatest I am has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 145 by Greatest I am, posted 09-11-2016 11:22 AM Phat has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024