Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,432 Year: 3,689/9,624 Month: 560/974 Week: 173/276 Day: 13/34 Hour: 0/6


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Biological Evolution ⇒

Extent of Mutational Capability

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Prev12
Author Topic:   Extent of Mutational Capability
Pressie
Member
Posts: 2103
From: Pretoria, SA
Joined: 06-18-2010

Normal Thread Display
Message 208 of 279 (794288)
11-14-2016 5:42 AM 		Reply to: Message 200 by CRR
11-12-2016 2:09 AM

Re: The Maths
CRR writes:
​
It was published in Journal of Creation, (Previously called TJ) Volume 19, Issue 1, Published April 2005
I'm not too sure why you think this is going to advance your case. So, never published in any scientific journal as a first step?
​
Still not going to do the maths for us, here? The maths for your claims, CRR. Please do the maths here.
​
Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.
​
Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.
​
Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 200 by CRR, posted 11-12-2016 2:09 AM CRR has not replied
  
Pressie
Member
Posts: 2103
From: Pretoria, SA
Joined: 06-18-2010

Normal Thread Display
Message 209 of 279 (794289)
11-14-2016 5:51 AM 		Reply to: Message 200 by CRR
11-12-2016 2:09 AM

Re: The Maths
CRR writes:
​
The paper was submitted previously to the journal Theoretical Population Biology, where renowned evolutionary geneticists Warren J. Ewens and James F. Crow reviewed it, along with Alexey Kondrashov and John Sanford. They all acknowledged this paper is essentially correct in all matters of substance. However, Ewens and Crow rejected it from publication on the grounds that it is not sufficiently new or different from what was known by themselves and some of their colleagues in the 1970s.
I don't believe you at all. You lie. Peer-reviewers are not named in journals.
​
But, interestingly is that they got Sanford was supposed to review according to you. Something smelly about it. Really, really smelly.
​
Please show us your maths, CRR.
​
Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.
​
Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 200 by CRR, posted 11-12-2016 2:09 AM CRR has not replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 210 by herebedragons, posted 11-14-2016 8:26 AM Pressie has not replied
 Message 211 by Dr Adequate, posted 11-14-2016 2:48 PM Pressie has replied
  
Pressie
Member
Posts: 2103
From: Pretoria, SA
Joined: 06-18-2010

Normal Thread Display
Message 212 of 279 (794399)
11-15-2016 6:04 AM 		Reply to: Message 211 by Dr Adequate
11-14-2016 2:48 PM

Re: The Maths
Not really. CRR was shown exactly where he/she was telling untruths, yet he/she kept on repeating the same falsehoods. To me that's a lie.
​
Maybe CRR is too intellectually challenged to realise that he/she keeps on telling untruths. Those untruths are and were
pointed out.
​
That's where it gets difficult. Sometimes you have to be cruel to be kind.
​
Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.
​
Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.
​
Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.
​
Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 211 by Dr Adequate, posted 11-14-2016 2:48 PM Dr Adequate has not replied
  
Pressie
Member
Posts: 2103
From: Pretoria, SA
Joined: 06-18-2010

Normal Thread Display
Message 213 of 279 (794402)
11-15-2016 6:49 AM 		Reply to: Message 9 by dwise1
10-18-2016 3:29 PM

Re: No Barriers to Macroevolution
dwise writes:
​
The terms macroevolution and microevolution are defined differently by creationists than by scientists.
Yes and creationists pretend that their 'definition' is 'scientific'. Creationists always tell untruths. That's how they do it. They always tell untruths.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by dwise1, posted 10-18-2016 3:29 PM dwise1 has not replied
  
Pressie
Member
Posts: 2103
From: Pretoria, SA
Joined: 06-18-2010

Normal Thread Display
Message 215 of 279 (794557)
11-17-2016 6:58 AM 		Reply to: Message 1 by Gregory Rogers
10-18-2016 8:10 AM

So, Gregory Rogers. Please show us the maths backing up your claims. From this thread it seems as if you are very reluctant to do it. Maybe it's because you don't have a clue?
This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Gregory Rogers, posted 10-18-2016 8:10 AM Gregory Rogers has not replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 216 by Dr Adequate, posted 11-18-2016 10:46 AM Pressie has not replied
  
Pressie
Member
Posts: 2103
From: Pretoria, SA
Joined: 06-18-2010

Normal Thread Display
Message 237 of 279 (798116)
01-31-2017 7:12 AM 		Reply to: Message 236 by CRR
01-31-2017 2:48 AM

Re: The Maths
Or, maybe you need to get some degree in genetics to learn how to understand the basics?
This message is a reply to:
 Message 236 by CRR, posted 01-31-2017 2:48 AM CRR has not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Prev12
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024