quote:
Originally posted by TrueCreation:
"Creationism on the other hand, is too far fetched for me to believe."
--What are the factors creationism is missing to make it as plausable as Evolution theory, try to retain a bit of an ignorant assertion such as 'it doesn't explain anything' or something along those lines, serious specifics if possible.
1. Noah's Ark? - A complete study and experiment of how this could have been done.
2. Creating Eve from a Rib of Adam? - A rational Scientific Explanation of this possibility.
3. Reliance on an omnipotent being. The Creationist argument relies on the existence of God. If you personally accept that God exists, this is fine, but to be a credible scientific theory it becomes necessary to first demonstrate that "God" exists and is capable of performing this act of creation.
4. Simple explanations of Glaciation. How this could have happened in a few thousand years.
5. Speed of Light NOT being constant.
6. How we can see the light from stars that are Millions of light years away, if the universe was created thousands of years ago.(see#6)
7. A COMPLETE invalidation of all Radiometric Dating Techniques.
8. Why we can't find any fossilized humans along with the Dinosaurs.
9. The creation of mountain ranges in a short period of time.
Please leave out the 'God DID it' explanations. Provide cold hard facts that are validated by leading scientists who hold respectable positions and credentials. Scientific papers discussing all your theory's including all peer reviewed material. If Creation Science is the answer, then this should be easy, and the evidence for such should outweigh all the evidence pointing towards the Theory of Evolution.
[This message has been edited by no2creation, 03-29-2002]