Election Rigging

Google scholar search on fake moon landing and you get nearly twice as many results. I guess that makes it twice as true. You're taking a different tack then I thought you would after seeing your comments in the The 2016 United States Presidential Election thread. Your voting machine excerpts are about things that *could* happen, not things that *did* happen, and gerrymandering has been going on since before the term was invented. Is there any evidence placing the outcome of the election in doubt? Or is this thread just about the hypothetical possibility of stealing a presidential election.--Percy

No there isn't, but you have to be willing to accept that what you'd like to believe happened didn't really happen. It isn't uncommon for people who buy into conspiracy theories to find this difficult.Why can't the major news organizations find this evidence that the outcome of the election is in doubt? Seems like it would be pretty big news involving opportunities for a Pulitzer or two - or are they part of the conspiracy, like the one where scientists are hiding the fact that evolution is a lie.--Percy

As Heinlein once said, only those having to be dragged kicking and screaming into office could be considered qualified. This has probably been quoted here before.--Percy

If I recall the sense of the full passage correctly (it's been nearly a half century) that was just the punchline. Heinlein's actual point was that desiring an office should be a disqualification.--Percy

Really? You trust the alt-media to report on this? If you don't think the alt-media is up to their elbows in propaganda and fake news, you are ignoring the evidence. Now you're just being a dick.--Percy