The 2016 United States Presidential Election

Irrelevant. Clinton did not invade. Clinton did not order an invasion.But thanks for your efforts to foist Trump on us. On the basis of the arguments that you are using, I guess we can hold you legally responsible for every bad decision that Trump makes.I will not further respond to your posts in this thread.

You must be talking about a different Hillary Clinton. The one that I know about has been reasonably consistent throughout her public career. That never happened.I call bullshit on your entire post. I'm not a Democrat. I despise the party. If any candidate of any party had done the things that Clinton is falsely accused of doing, I would be outraged.You should stop listening to the right wing propaganda machine. Or, at least, do some fact checking. I was never a fan of Hillary. I have wished, all along, that we had a better candidate. I voted for Sanders in the primary. Her connection to it is minor and insignificant. Nevertheless, I was not a fan of Hillary. I did consider her too hasty to favor war, and that was one of the reasons that I was never a fan.What I object to, is the deliberate lies being told about her. The nation is not served well when people vote on the basis of lies. And both you and dronestar have been spreading lies about Hillary. That's your guess. It is a possibility, and a concern. It is one of the reasons that I would have preferred a better candidate. But it is no excuse for spreading lies about her. I don't watch either of those. Actually, I don't watch TV news at all. If that's the only problem that you see with Trump, then you are completely blind with respect to policy questions.

One more reply.It occurs to me that maybe you and dronestar don't fully understand what Clinton voted for.What she voted for:

• was not a declaration of war;
• was not an authorization to go to war.

It was merely a resolution of support for the president. It carries the same legal weight as expressing an opinion here at evcforum. That is to say, it carries no legal weight at all. Bush could have gone to war without such a resolution. He could have gone to war if the vote on the resolution had been opposed. The chances are that a strongly opposed vote would have caused Bush to reconsider, but it would not even require that.As for her role in Syria as secretary of state: she had no ability to commit any troops. She could only make recommendations to the president. Any decision to commit troops would have been the president's.

I think we pretty much know the answer to that.For the rest, I'll wait and see.I see that Faith, at one of her blogs, is worried that Trump might renege on some of his promises. I guarantee that he will renege on most of them, because they are mostly unachievable. He is apparently already having second thoughts on repealing Obama Care.

That's because they are American conservative Christians, which means that they are worshipers of Jesus Ayn Rand Christ (sometimes known as "the anti-Christ").

I'm pretty sure that's false.It was Bush and Cheney who invented WMDs. I'm pretty sure that the intelligence community was giving Bush accurate information in private, while giving him that "slam dunk" in public.