Atheism Cannot Rationally Explain Morals.

I suspect a hidden "except for...".

He didn't go that far yet. He's just implied that any morality atheists exhibit is irrational. It's the same old "rational atheists should conclude that they can do anything they want, so why aren't they rampaging and murdering and raping and pillaging?".I regard anyone who thinks religious belief is required for moral behavior with some concern. But they are a priori wrong, atheists in general are moral. That is an observed fact, so the interesting question is "why?", not "why are you doing atheism wrong? ".

He jumped the gun a bit. We've been down this road so many times it's easy to get stuck in the deep ruts.

Dawn, like the vast majority of atheists, has morals. Just not objective ones. If they were truly objective atheists would accept Dawn's source of morals.Morals are a product of society, and differ greatly over time and space.Edited by JonF, : No reason given.

I suspect that you do not define "ACTUAL MORALITY" as "acting morally in word and deed".

Antony Flew. There's a pretty even-handed article about him, by someone who knew him personally and with lots of Flew quotes, at Antony Flew Considers God...Sort Of » Internet Infidels.TL;DR: he became unsure of his atheism but never affirmed the existence of any God(s), and his reasons for being unsure had nothing to do with morality.

Sounds as if you really do need an externally imposed moral compass.I don't. Atheists in general don't.Edited by JonF, : No reason given.Edited by JonF, : No reason given.