Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 85 (8915 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 07-22-2019 6:19 AM
29 online now:
Heathen (1 member, 28 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: 4petdinos
Upcoming Birthdays: anglagard
Post Volume:
Total: 857,297 Year: 12,333/19,786 Month: 2,114/2,641 Week: 69/554 Day: 6/63 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Can you disprove this secular argument against evolution?
Dr Adequate
Member
Posts: 16097
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 11 of 293 (803489)
03-31-2017 11:25 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by forexhr
03-31-2017 3:26 AM


There seems to be an element of the Texas Sharpshooter fallacy here, in that you are calculating (I do not know how accurately) the odds of what did happen happening, rather than the odds of something similarly interesting happening.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by forexhr, posted 03-31-2017 3:26 AM forexhr has not yet responded

  
Dr Adequate
Member
Posts: 16097
Joined: 07-20-2006


(1)
Message 26 of 293 (803508)
03-31-2017 6:36 PM
Reply to: Message 22 by forexhr
03-31-2017 3:03 PM


The DNA codes for spatial arrangements of cells in the form of functional bio-structures. A heart valve is one such arrangement, while the ear is another. In between you have a nearly infinite number of junk arrangements. You can't just wave a magic wand of mutations and jump from one bio-functional arrangement of cells to another, and than claim - natural selection did it!

But mutations often do get us from one functioning organism to another. These mutations are of course not caused by natural selection, but they are preserved by it.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by forexhr, posted 03-31-2017 3:03 PM forexhr has not yet responded

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019