Hitchy! My homie! You stated earlier that:
1-science explains NATURAL phenomena in the NATURAL universe that is guided by NATURAL laws. religion deals with the supernatural. of course, people can still argue that there are natural explanations as well as and alongside supernatural explanations for occurences in the bible. of course, the same could be said of any book that intertwines reality with fantasy. however, i wouldn't advocate using those fantasy books in science classes or as guides to how to treat antibiotic-resistant bacteria.
I agree except that I may ask that in regards to religion as entwining reality and fantasy....how can one be sure which is which if in the context of definition, religion deals with the supernatural?
By definition the supernatural is unprovable and unverifiable yet to call it a fairy tale or a myth is assuming an absolute truth of your own based on verifiable provable knowledge.
i just hope that our youngster realizes the dangers of placing a book of subjective beliefs, myths and rituals in a science class. if i teach that you can decide which is better science (meaning better to you and your brainwashing family/community/etc.)--evolution or creationism--i am committing the greatest sin of all--lying to my students.
While it is true that science is based on verifiable facts while religion is not verifiable, it is also not good teaching to place any non verifiable fact in the realm of a fairy tale. By definition, supernatural phenomena are facts within the context of the bible. While we have all seen the bible lambasted and ridiculed, we cannot know for sure that a supernatural battle between good and evil is in fact taking place. It is not science==I cannot prove the supernatural to anyone although I have personally witnessed it.
I DO agree with the teachers who state that Biblical truth is best discussed in other classes besides science.
[This message has been edited by Phatboy, 01-23-2004]