|
Author
|
Topic: The TRVE history of the Flood...
|
Adminnemooseus
Administrator Posts: 3974 Joined: 09-26-2002
|
|
Message 60 of 1352 (804288)
04-07-2017 1:11 AM
|
Reply to: Message 59 by Davidjay
04-07-2017 12:45 AM
|
|
Admin warning - Give us some evidence that the flood happened
This is a rather mixed non-admin mode/admin mode message. You are giving a Biblical chronology of a scientifically dubious (to say the least) event, combined with some other blather. All of this seems to be irrelevant to any evidence that "the flood" happened. You were mighty close to a 24 hour suspension. So, why should the non-creationist side have a "belief" that the flood happened? We're talking worldly evidence, not that "the Bible said so". Minnemooseus/Adminnemooseus
Or something like that.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 59 by Davidjay, posted 04-07-2017 12:45 AM | | Davidjay has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 63 by Davidjay, posted 04-07-2017 10:02 AM | | Adminnemooseus has replied |
|
Adminnemooseus
Administrator Posts: 3974 Joined: 09-26-2002
|
|
|
Message 84 of 1352 (804312)
04-08-2017 1:12 AM
|
Reply to: Message 63 by Davidjay
04-07-2017 10:02 AM
|
|
Not a science topic, going to be moved
The TOPIC is mathematical proof of the timing and true place in History of the Great Worldwide Flood. This is not a science topic, this is some sort of Bible study topic. Indeed, Davidjay has not offered up the slightest scrap of scientific support for "the flood" having happened. Going to move topic to the "Bible Study" forum. The science side follows it there at the own personal risk. Adminnemooseus
Or something like that.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 63 by Davidjay, posted 04-07-2017 10:02 AM | | Davidjay has not replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 89 by herebedragons, posted 04-08-2017 8:13 AM | | Adminnemooseus has seen this message but not replied |
|
Adminnemooseus
Administrator Posts: 3974 Joined: 09-26-2002
|
|
|
Message 85 of 1352 (804314)
04-08-2017 1:13 AM
|
|
|
Thread Copied from Geology and the Great Flood Forum
|
Adminnemooseus
Administrator Posts: 3974 Joined: 09-26-2002
(1)
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Message 152 of 1352 (805008)
04-15-2017 12:16 AM
|
Reply to: Message 151 by Davidjay
04-15-2017 12:00 AM
|
|
2 locations of the same assertions
The Lords history is exact and explained in detail to the year, in Genesis... and is verified by OneDayTilNoahsFlood You know, supporting an assertion by citing another location where you make the same assertion is not supporting the assertion. I'm, however, am inclined to think that it is spamming. NO RESPONSES TO THIS ADMIN MESSAGE AT THIS TOPIC LOCATION - GO TO THE APPROPRIATE TOPIC IN THE "ANNOUNCEMENT" AT PAGE TOP. Adminnemooseus
Or something like that.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 151 by Davidjay, posted 04-15-2017 12:00 AM | | Davidjay has not replied |
|
Adminnemooseus
Administrator Posts: 3974 Joined: 09-26-2002
|
(1)
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Message 254 of 1352 (805500)
04-18-2017 11:41 PM
|
|
|
"Bible Study" topic, not a science topic
When this topic started, it ended up being a topic for Davidjay to do his Biblical numbers thing. Thus it got moved to the "Bible Study" forum. So, science is off-topic here. Davidjay hasn't been here for a couple of days. Especially if he isn't participating, I see this topic heading for summation mode soon. Adminnemooseus
Or something like that.
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 258 by Dr Adequate, posted 04-19-2017 12:02 AM | | Adminnemooseus has not replied |
|
Adminnemooseus
Administrator Posts: 3974 Joined: 09-26-2002
|
|
|
Message 260 of 1352 (805506)
04-19-2017 12:24 AM
|
Reply to: Message 259 by NoNukes
04-19-2017 12:06 AM
|
|
Re: "Bible Study" topic, not a science topic
cience is off topic, but non scientific extrapolations only loosely tied to what is actual described in the Bible are on topic and cannot be rebutted by facts? How odd. I guess the thing to do is to request Biblical support for those extrapolations. A "cite chapter and verse" thing? Hey, I'm not claiming that anything to do with "The Flood" really makes worldly sense. Adminnemooseus
Or something like that.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 259 by NoNukes, posted 04-19-2017 12:06 AM | | NoNukes has seen this message but not replied |
|
Adminnemooseus
Administrator Posts: 3974 Joined: 09-26-2002
|
(1)
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Message 515 of 1352 (806343)
04-24-2017 8:19 PM
|
Reply to: Message 489 by Pressie
04-24-2017 6:46 AM
|
|
Re: A New Topic: The Cratonic Sequences
Pressie writes: Faith writes: Sigh. Try one more time: DURING THE 542 million years that are said to span the Phanerozoic Era from the Cambrian to the Cenozoic, was there or was there not a series of sea transgressions over South Africa or any other continent? I'll try one more time. The Phanerozoic is not a period and also not a layer. I think that Faith has a very legitimate question here, and your response has nothing to do with the question. Her question might have been answered to some degree further downthread. I think I'm going to start a new topic concerning the mechanisms of sea transgression and regression. Adminnemooseus
Or something like that.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 489 by Pressie, posted 04-24-2017 6:46 AM | | Pressie has not replied |
|
Adminnemooseus
Administrator Posts: 3974 Joined: 09-26-2002
|
(2)
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Message 608 of 1352 (807251)
05-01-2017 7:16 PM
|
Reply to: Message 605 by jar
05-01-2017 12:53 PM
|
|
Jar, 24 hour suspension
Why do you post such utterly stupid comments Faith. New layers are being deposited across the entire continent every single day. No real substance, just jerkishness. Adminnemooseus
Or something like that.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 605 by jar, posted 05-01-2017 12:53 PM | | jar has not replied |
|
Adminnemooseus
Administrator Posts: 3974 Joined: 09-26-2002
|
|
|
Message 996 of 1352 (811996)
06-13-2017 10:21 PM
|
|
|
Less bickering, more substance please
Like, what did I say in the subtitle??? Oh, yeah...
Less bickering, more substance please Adminnemooseus
Or something like that.
|
Adminnemooseus
Administrator Posts: 3974 Joined: 09-26-2002
|
|
|
Message 1282 of 1352 (814389)
07-08-2017 9:02 PM
|
Reply to: Message 1279 by Pollux
07-08-2017 8:35 PM
|
|
Semi-random Adminnemooseus references request
A couple of pretty nice messages there, but I would be nice if you cite/link to source materials. Without such, the messages rather fall into the "unsupported assertions" category. Not just you, this happens a lot around here. In general, most messages should also contain one or more references (links, if from on-line). No replies to this message, in this message. Replies (and I would love to see a discussion of this matter) should go to General Discussion Of Moderation Procedures (aka 'The Whine List'). There are also specific topic(s) concerning the need for references in messages, somewhere at this forum. Adminnemooseus
Or something like that.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 1279 by Pollux, posted 07-08-2017 8:35 PM | | Pollux has seen this message but not replied |
|
Adminnemooseus
Administrator Posts: 3974 Joined: 09-26-2002
|
|
|
Message 1346 of 1352 (814937)
07-13-2017 7:36 PM
|
Reply to: Message 1308 by RAZD
07-13-2017 7:33 AM
|
|
RAZD "spamming" his Dates and Dating topic again???
It still don't think that big chunks of your "Age Correlations and An Old Earth..." topic(s) belong in this topic. No responses to this message, in this topic. Y'all should know where to post such replies. Adminnemooseus
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 1308 by RAZD, posted 07-13-2017 7:33 AM | | RAZD has seen this message but not replied |
|
™ Version 4.2