Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,806 Year: 3,063/9,624 Month: 908/1,588 Week: 91/223 Day: 2/17 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Atheism Cannot Rationally Explain Morals.
Taq
Member
Posts: 9970
Joined: 03-06-2009
Member Rating: 5.6


(2)
Message 781 of 1006 (806692)
04-27-2017 10:34 AM
Reply to: Message 769 by Davidjay
04-26-2017 9:57 PM


Re: Evolutionists can not explain morals
Davidjay writes:
Evolutionists can not explain altruistic behaviour,
If altruistic behavior spreads the genes you are carrying, then it will be selected for. This is what altruistic behavior does. A good example are bee colonies. While the workers are sterile, their genes are still found in the queen, and the queen spreads the genes found in the worker bees due to their altruistic behavior.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 769 by Davidjay, posted 04-26-2017 9:57 PM Davidjay has not replied

  
dwise1
Member
Posts: 5930
Joined: 05-02-2006
Member Rating: 5.8


(4)
Message 782 of 1006 (806710)
04-27-2017 11:01 AM
Reply to: Message 769 by Davidjay
04-26-2017 9:57 PM


Re: Evolutionists can not explain morals
Evolutionists can not explain altruistic behaviour, as evolution states it is the survival of the fittest competition, and extinction to the losers who do not mutate every billion years.
No, that was Spenser as I recall. And obviously you have absolutely no clue what fitness is, so how could you possibly say anything meaningful about it.
Evolution explain altruistic behavior quite well. Rather, it is the creationists and even Christianity itself that cannot explain altruistic behavior. If all your good acts and self-sacrifice for others are motivated by your angry god, by wanting to avoid its extreme punishments and earn its rewards, then you cannot possibly act altruistically. Your motivation for everything you do is complete and utter selfishness.
Altruism is beyond the comprehension of creationists.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 769 by Davidjay, posted 04-26-2017 9:57 PM Davidjay has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 790 by Davidjay, posted 04-28-2017 9:40 AM dwise1 has replied

  
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


(1)
Message 783 of 1006 (806737)
04-27-2017 11:33 AM
Reply to: Message 780 by Davidjay
04-27-2017 9:53 AM


Re: Atheism and Evolution are bed mates
I don't think this is Dredge's point, but I'll go ahead and answer one of you points.
Davidjay writes:
Evolution is about competition and not about co-operation.... Evolution leads to selfishness, and the extinctions of others that take our supposed resources or are in competition for our resources.
Scientific theories are descriptive - they explain why the world is the way it is. They are not prescriptive - they don't tell us what are ethical decisions should be. Any "meaning" that can be taken from a scientific theory, if any, is up to the individual.
Saying that the theory of evolution implies we should all act selfish is the same as saying the theory of gravity means we should all crawl on our bellies and live in valleys.
Edited by Chiroptera, : Hit submit instead of preview.
Edited by Chiroptera, : No reason given.
Edited by Chiroptera, : Serious typo. Yikes!

I believe in a relatively equal society, supported by institutions that limit extremes of wealth and poverty. I believe in democracy, civil liberties, and the rule of law. That makes me a liberal, and I’m proud of it. -- Paul Krugman

This message is a reply to:
 Message 780 by Davidjay, posted 04-27-2017 9:53 AM Davidjay has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 284 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


(5)
Message 784 of 1006 (806749)
04-27-2017 12:07 PM
Reply to: Message 779 by Davidjay
04-27-2017 9:44 AM


Re: Banana comments are foolish and violations IMO
Your banana comments are pure foolishness, and sexual.
Sexual? David, I don't know how you go about getting a banana inside you, but for most of us this is not a sexual act. See, I eat them. Are you by some chance sticking them up your arse?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 779 by Davidjay, posted 04-27-2017 9:44 AM Davidjay has not replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 411 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 785 of 1006 (806752)
04-27-2017 12:16 PM
Reply to: Message 769 by Davidjay
04-26-2017 9:57 PM


Re: Evolutionists can not explain morals
Davidjay writes:
Evolutionists can not explain altruistic behaviour, as evolution states it is the survival of the fittest competition....
Evolution is about survival of the species, not the individual. Any behaviour that advances the survival of other individuals in our species advances the survival of the species as a whole.
There is also the obvious advantage that even if we do die as individuals, there are other members of our species, whom we have helped to survive, to help our offspring to survive.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 769 by Davidjay, posted 04-26-2017 9:57 PM Davidjay has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 786 by Coyote, posted 04-27-2017 12:24 PM ringo has seen this message but not replied
 Message 787 by Chiroptera, posted 04-27-2017 12:49 PM ringo has seen this message but not replied
 Message 834 by Dredge, posted 05-01-2017 4:12 AM ringo has replied

  
Coyote
Member (Idle past 2105 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


(1)
Message 786 of 1006 (806755)
04-27-2017 12:24 PM
Reply to: Message 785 by ringo
04-27-2017 12:16 PM


Re: Evolutionists can not explain morals
Any behaviour that advances the survival of other individuals in our species advances the survival of the species as a whole.
Correct.
And this is where grandparents and elders--past the reproduction age--can benefit their groups. Grandparents care for the young while parents are out hunting and gathering, and are often the most skilled at making baskets, stone tools, and a lot of other needed items. Elders carry and pass on the knowledge of the group.
So, even though these individuals may no longer be reproducing they increase the chances for other members of the group to survive to do so.
And this is all explained by anthropology and related fields of science.
And I might add this is more important than passing down old folk tales about talking snakes and floods that didn't happen.

Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.
Belief gets in the way of learning--Robert A. Heinlein
In the name of diversity, college student demands to be kept in ignorance of the culture that made diversity a value--StultisTheFool
It's not what we don't know that hurts, it's what we know that ain't so--Will Rogers
If I am entitled to something, someone else is obliged to pay--Jerry Pournelle
If a religion's teachings are true, then it should have nothing to fear from science...--dwise1
"Multiculturalism" demands that the US be tolerant of everything except its own past, culture, traditions, and identity.
Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and offended to discover that there are other points of view--William F. Buckley Jr.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 785 by ringo, posted 04-27-2017 12:16 PM ringo has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 788 by Taq, posted 04-27-2017 3:09 PM Coyote has seen this message but not replied
 Message 789 by Tanypteryx, posted 04-27-2017 8:08 PM Coyote has seen this message but not replied

  
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 787 of 1006 (806759)
04-27-2017 12:49 PM
Reply to: Message 785 by ringo
04-27-2017 12:16 PM


Re: Evolutionists can not explain morals
ringo writes:
Evolution is about survival of the species, not the individual.
If I may be allowed to be pedantic, evolution is about certain gene combinations surviving into the next generation.
Usually this is accomplished by the survival of the individual long enough to produce offspring. For some species, though, an individual making a sacrifice to help related individuals survive to reproduce can have the same effect.
In either case, the result is the species thrives.

I believe in a relatively equal society, supported by institutions that limit extremes of wealth and poverty. I believe in democracy, civil liberties, and the rule of law. That makes me a liberal, and I’m proud of it. -- Paul Krugman

This message is a reply to:
 Message 785 by ringo, posted 04-27-2017 12:16 PM ringo has seen this message but not replied

  
Taq
Member
Posts: 9970
Joined: 03-06-2009
Member Rating: 5.6


(2)
Message 788 of 1006 (806764)
04-27-2017 3:09 PM
Reply to: Message 786 by Coyote
04-27-2017 12:24 PM


Re: Evolutionists can not explain morals
Coyote writes:
And this is where grandparents and elders--past the reproduction age--can benefit their groups. Grandparents care for the young while parents are out hunting and gathering, and are often the most skilled at making baskets, stone tools, and a lot of other needed items. Elders carry and pass on the knowledge of the group.
It is also worth mentioning that in human hunter/gatherer groups there is a good chance that the young are carrying the genes found in the elders, either through direct ancestry or through very close relatives. Even in cases of intraspecific competition there is still selection for altruistic behavior since the human groups who work well together within the group can outcompete lone humans or human groups that don't cooperate well together.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 786 by Coyote, posted 04-27-2017 12:24 PM Coyote has seen this message but not replied

  
Tanypteryx
Member
Posts: 4344
From: Oregon, USA
Joined: 08-27-2006
Member Rating: 5.8


(1)
Message 789 of 1006 (806776)
04-27-2017 8:08 PM
Reply to: Message 786 by Coyote
04-27-2017 12:24 PM


Re: Evolutionists can not explain morals
So, even though these individuals may no longer be reproducing they increase the chances for other members of the group to survive to do so.
We also see a similar behavior in other species where individuals spend time protecting and nurturing the next generation of siblings. Scrub Jays often hang around and help raise the next generation or two of siblings. This behavior is preserved in the species because the older siblings will sometimes inherit their parent's territory and raise their own broods. Jays are smart birds and they benefit from the time spent hanging around learning useful parenting skills.
Some jays strike out on their own and establish new territories. I am not sure if there have been studies measuring if the two groups have different levels of long-term success (reproductive longevity and success), but it seems like an obvious study.

What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python
One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie
If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy
The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq

This message is a reply to:
 Message 786 by Coyote, posted 04-27-2017 12:24 PM Coyote has seen this message but not replied

  
Davidjay 
Suspended Member (Idle past 2328 days)
Posts: 1026
From: B.C Canada
Joined: 11-05-2004


Message 790 of 1006 (806820)
04-28-2017 9:40 AM
Reply to: Message 782 by dwise1
04-27-2017 11:01 AM


Re: Evolutionists can not explain morals
Then explain altruistic behaviour in evolution theory.
Quite demanding answers from others and refuse to answer anything from your god of evolution. !!!

.
The Lord is the GREAT SCIENTIST as He created SCIENCE and ALL LAWS and ALL MATTER and of course ALL LIFE. God is the Great Architect, Designer and Mathematician. Evolutioon is not mathematical and says there is no DESIGN but that all things came about by sheer LUCK.
.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 782 by dwise1, posted 04-27-2017 11:01 AM dwise1 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 791 by dwise1, posted 04-28-2017 10:13 AM Davidjay has not replied
 Message 792 by Diomedes, posted 04-28-2017 3:27 PM Davidjay has not replied

  
dwise1
Member
Posts: 5930
Joined: 05-02-2006
Member Rating: 5.8


(8)
Message 791 of 1006 (806829)
04-28-2017 10:13 AM
Reply to: Message 790 by Davidjay
04-28-2017 9:40 AM


Re: Evolutionists can not explain morals
Why should I waste my time explaining the same thing to you that everybody else has been telling you. You will just ignore me too. I need to pack for a period of extended travel starting today and you are nothing but a waste of effort. And that your religion has turned you into that is a condemnation of that religion. Apply the Matthew 7:20 to your religion -- HINT: you are wicked fruit.
In evolutionary theory, getting your genes represented in subsequent generations is the basic game. If you sacrifice yourself to ensure the survival of your children, then that gets your genes into subsequent generations. If you sacrifice yourself to ensure the survival of your siblings' children, then the outcome is the same -- HINT: they share your genes. Same for your cousins and their children. Same for members of your tribe and for the tribe itself, since tribes have traditionally been peopled by kin. Even when the concept of tribe has been extended beyond kinship, working to preserve the tribe also helps ensure the survival of your kin who depend on that tribe for survival -- that is also an evolutionary basis for morality.
In contrast, in Christianity there is no basis for morality because it serves no other purpose than to appease an arbitrary and angry god. And because your entire theology is about seeking eternal reward and avoiding eternal punishment, there is no basis in Christianity for altruism and it is impossible for a Christian to be altruistic because of his theology. However, since a Christian is a human who has the same evolutionary history of normals, a Christian can indeed engage in altruistic acts only because he is human, not because he's a Christian.
Now please pull your head out and stop ignoring what everybody has been trying to tell you. But of course you will just ignore this as well.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 790 by Davidjay, posted 04-28-2017 9:40 AM Davidjay has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 793 by Faith, posted 04-28-2017 3:36 PM dwise1 has not replied
 Message 1002 by dwise1, posted 08-18-2017 2:23 PM dwise1 has not replied

  
Diomedes
Member
Posts: 995
From: Central Florida, USA
Joined: 09-13-2013


Message 792 of 1006 (806872)
04-28-2017 3:27 PM
Reply to: Message 790 by Davidjay
04-28-2017 9:40 AM


Re: Evolutionists can not explain morals
Then explain altruistic behaviour in evolution theory.
quote:
In evolutionary biology, an organism is said to behave altruistically when its behaviour benefits other organisms, at a cost to itself. The costs and benefits are measured in terms of reproductive fitness, or expected number of offspring.
Biological Altruism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
Oh, and you're welcome.
Anything else we can help you with Davidjay? Perhaps this link will also be of assistance:
English Grammar for Dummies Cheat Sheet
English Grammar For Dummies Cheat Sheet - dummies

This message is a reply to:
 Message 790 by Davidjay, posted 04-28-2017 9:40 AM Davidjay has not replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1444 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 793 of 1006 (806873)
04-28-2017 3:36 PM
Reply to: Message 791 by dwise1
04-28-2017 10:13 AM


Re: Evolutionists can not explain morals
it is impossible for a Christian to be altruistic because of his theology.
Jhn 15:13
Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends.
Not to mention all the commands about self-denial, dying to self, loving your enemies, doing good to those who persecute you, doing the extra mile, making yourself a living sacrifice, loving your neighbor as yourself and so on
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 791 by dwise1, posted 04-28-2017 10:13 AM dwise1 has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 794 by Taq, posted 04-28-2017 4:04 PM Faith has replied
 Message 795 by Dr Adequate, posted 04-28-2017 7:28 PM Faith has not replied

  
Taq
Member
Posts: 9970
Joined: 03-06-2009
Member Rating: 5.6


(1)
Message 794 of 1006 (806875)
04-28-2017 4:04 PM
Reply to: Message 793 by Faith
04-28-2017 3:36 PM


Re: Evolutionists can not explain morals
Faith writes:
Not to mention all the commands about self-denial, dying to self, loving your enemies, doing good to those who persecute you, doing the extra mile, making yourself a living sacrifice, loving your neighbor as yourself and so on
"And Samuel said to Saul, The Lord sent me to anoint you king over his people Israel; now therefore listen to the words of the Lord. Thus says the Lord of hosts, ‘I have noted what Amalek did to Israel in opposing them on the way when they came up out of Egypt. Now go and strike Amalek and devote to destruction all that they have. Do not spare them, but kill both man and woman, child and infant, ox and sheep, camel and donkey.’ (1 Sam 15:1‑3)
God ordained genocide. Nuff said.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 793 by Faith, posted 04-28-2017 3:36 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 796 by Faith, posted 04-28-2017 9:30 PM Taq has replied
 Message 830 by Dredge, posted 05-01-2017 1:17 AM Taq has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 284 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


(2)
Message 795 of 1006 (806883)
04-28-2017 7:28 PM
Reply to: Message 793 by Faith
04-28-2017 3:36 PM


Re: Evolutionists can not explain morals
Not to mention all the commands about self-denial, dying to self, loving your enemies, doing good to those who persecute you, doing the extra mile, making yourself a living sacrifice, loving your neighbor as yourself and so on
But dwise1's point is that insofar as you're doing this for Christian reasons, you're doing this for selfish reasons, to suck up to God. As can be seen from the fact that if God told you to kill your enemies (as he does from time to time in the Bible) you would in principle do that instead. Or indeed if he told you to kill your friends and family. Abraham didn't get all famous by saying "No Lord, I won't kill my son just to please you, that wouldn't be altruistic".

This message is a reply to:
 Message 793 by Faith, posted 04-28-2017 3:36 PM Faith has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 797 by Chiroptera, posted 04-28-2017 9:31 PM Dr Adequate has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024