Evolution says indirectly, that there is no design and no Designer, only luck and chance
You're forgetting selection.
Admin, I'm not allowed to write about the God of Selection, so referring to it, Admin is hardly something I can respond to.
No one said you couldn't write about the "God of Selection."
But I didn't say you were forgetting about the "God of Selection". I said, "You're forgetting selection." I reminded you that you were forgetting selection because you left it out of your definition of evolution.
But you might consider changing this title from Numerology to just Mathematical ARGUMENTS that the Speed of Light was Designed.
You're making numerological arguments, so no, I won't consider changing the title.
I am answering all questions concerning Light Speed by Design,...
Not so anyone can tell. You must engage with the other participants in the thread. This is a discussion, not a soliloquy.
If you're sincere about wanting to answer all questions, please learn to use the quoting facility (described in the document dBCodes). Use it to quote the part of a person's message that you're answering. Here's an example of use of the quoting facility:
[gs]This is of course not true, as can easily be verified by looking at two humans.[/qs] Didnt work..moving on...
That's because you typed [gs] instead of [qs]. Please go back and edit your message to edit the [gs] into a [qs].
I am not allowed to write about or start a topic on the measure of man, the measurements to the Sun and across the Solar Plane because the admin says it is off topic to discuss how measurements are related to man.
It is untrue that I said this, but I grant that it is unlikely I would approve such a topic. Why don't you propose a thread arguing the validity of numerology?
You're still typing [gs] instead of [/qs]. The first letter is a "q". That's "q" as in the first letter of words like queue, queen, quiet, quorum, quake. Use [qs] at the beginning and [/qs] at the end of your quotes and it will work fine.
And Percy I do understand why you wouldnt allow a topic on the MEASURE OF MAN, it is too devastating for evolutionists and archelogists, and geologists to see conclusive evidence against their theories and their lack of math.
I'd be unlikely to approve such a topic because of your inability to make sense and unwillingness to engage in actual discussion with other participants. Whether you admit it to yourself or not, you're a numerologist. I would quickly approve a topic to discuss the merits of numerology, assuming it passed muster as a quality proposal.
(The above is a SUMMATION of mine, as this thread was put in SUMMATION MODE, because I assume I had proven beyond a shadow of a doubt my claim and measurments, even though I have so many more proofs yet to come)
If you'd bothered to actually read the notice you would have seen that this thread is not yet in summation mode. Summation mode begins tomorrow morning around 9 AM ET. I did this because of your refusal to address the many errors identified in your calculations, but there's still time.