Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 63 (9041 total)
78 online now:
anglagard, driewerf, nwr, PaulK, ringo, xongsmith (6 members, 72 visitors)
Newest Member: maria
Post Volume: Total: 885,916 Year: 3,562/14,102 Month: 182/321 Week: 42/59 Day: 3/4 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The story of Bones and Dogs and Humans
Davidjay 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1261 days)
Posts: 1026
From: B.C Canada
Joined: 11-05-2004


Message 40 of 56 (810748)
06-01-2017 11:29 AM
Reply to: Message 39 by RAZD
05-31-2017 5:11 PM


Re: Dogs are still dogs is the point ... and Davidjay is still lying
Your first post and original post and GRAPHICS depicts a wolf becoming different dog breeds and then you suggesting that this variation is proof that evolution can jump the gap into new KINDS.

Not just a variation of dogs but a new KIND or new species.

So Yes you are free to remove your original graphics that suggest and you later suggest proves evolution.

No problem simply remove the graphics and edit out your jumping gap proof.

Very simple Razz, only would take about three minutes.

And then you might also consider choosing another occupation that designer, when you always seem to be against design, and the DESIGNER.

But your choice...

No I am not lying, its your graph, and your words, and your principles of jumping the gap. But if you choose you can state that INBREEDING IS NOT EVOLUTIONARY CHANGE

Edited by Davidjay, : No reason given.


Evolution is not science. It did not create life nor did it diversify life. It didn;t create the laws that exist nor did it create science. It is a religion and not Science.

Intelligent design always defeats evolutions lack of design and lack of intelligence. Luck and Chance is not a scientific doctrine,


This message is a reply to:
 Message 39 by RAZD, posted 05-31-2017 5:11 PM RAZD has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 41 by Davidjay, posted 06-01-2017 11:33 AM Davidjay has not yet responded
 Message 46 by RAZD, posted 06-02-2017 7:23 AM Davidjay has not yet responded

  
Davidjay 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1261 days)
Posts: 1026
From: B.C Canada
Joined: 11-05-2004


Message 41 of 56 (810749)
06-01-2017 11:33 AM
Reply to: Message 40 by Davidjay
06-01-2017 11:29 AM


Re: Just state, INBREEDING IS NOT EVOLUTIONARY CHANGE.
Let me make it easier for you to clarify your mystifying comments and hoped for proofs. Just come out and state Inbreeding proves evolutionary change OR INBREEDING does not prove evolutionary change.

Have some courage as it only takes about ten seconds to make up your mind and post clearly..... come on, you can do it. Make up your mind.... and answer this very simple question rather than calling me a liar, and a mis-representer.


Evolution is not science. It did not create life nor did it diversify life. It didn;t create the laws that exist nor did it create science. It is a religion and not Science.

Intelligent design always defeats evolutions lack of design and lack of intelligence. Luck and Chance is not a scientific doctrine,


This message is a reply to:
 Message 40 by Davidjay, posted 06-01-2017 11:29 AM Davidjay has not yet responded

  
Davidjay 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1261 days)
Posts: 1026
From: B.C Canada
Joined: 11-05-2004


Message 48 of 56 (810866)
06-02-2017 11:33 AM
Reply to: Message 47 by RAZD
06-02-2017 7:36 AM


Razz, does your inbreeding creat a new species ?

If so, then it confirms that inbreeding human populations can creat a new species of humans that is not human but a new KInd ? This confirming that evolution is a racist doctrine.

If you deny inbreeding creates a new species, then remove that silly false dog chart that suggests inbred dogs create a new Kind or species.

And enough stupid excuses that say this definition or your new definition excuses you and your dogs.


Evolution is not science. It did not create life nor did it diversify life. It didn;t create the laws that exist nor did it create science. It is a religion and not Science.

Intelligent design always defeats evolutions lack of design and lack of intelligence. Luck and Chance is not a scientific doctrine,


This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by RAZD, posted 06-02-2017 7:36 AM RAZD has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 49 by Davidjay, posted 06-02-2017 11:36 AM Davidjay has not yet responded
 Message 51 by RAZD, posted 06-02-2017 2:08 PM Davidjay has responded

  
Davidjay 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1261 days)
Posts: 1026
From: B.C Canada
Joined: 11-05-2004


Message 49 of 56 (810867)
06-02-2017 11:36 AM
Reply to: Message 48 by Davidjay
06-02-2017 11:33 AM


Evolutionists refuse to answer
Evasive, elusive, erratic, errant, evolutionists.... can not answer questions because their theory or god is evasive elusive, erratic, and errant.

Evolution is not science. It did not create life nor did it diversify life. It didn;t create the laws that exist nor did it create science. It is a religion and not Science.

Intelligent design always defeats evolutions lack of design and lack of intelligence. Luck and Chance is not a scientific doctrine,


This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by Davidjay, posted 06-02-2017 11:33 AM Davidjay has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 50 by Coyote, posted 06-02-2017 11:51 AM Davidjay has not yet responded

  
Davidjay 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1261 days)
Posts: 1026
From: B.C Canada
Joined: 11-05-2004


Message 52 of 56 (810912)
06-03-2017 5:25 AM
Reply to: Message 51 by RAZD
06-02-2017 2:08 PM


Talk about a dumb response... Evasive answer and answers, Razz superceeds all other evolutionists in saying nothing and never answering....

does inbreeding creat a new species..Not by itself answsers Razz

What a gutless whimpy reply.. She doesnt say what else is injected into their miracle species creation, just NOT BY ITSELF.....

Is that scientific NO, Is that comprehensible NO... Is that an answer NO.

Dumber than dumb.

Maybe evolutionists want to throw in their god of selection, who knows Razz doesn;t say what else is needed to make inbreeding jump the gap and actually start producing a new species.

But insanely for a rational person says, she can not define a species... or KIND so is unable to answer further.

IE. Dumb evolutionists have nothing but semantics and no science behind their dumb theory. All they have is name changes, literary classifications, and double speak, and artists imaginations.

Yes, evolutionists have great GREAT problems with their lack of evidence and lack of answers. Yet always try to blame those that question them for not understanding their dog pics, and their inbreeding.

Inbreeding does not creat new species or KINDS. Its a BIG LIE of evolution and evolutionists.

Edited by Davidjay, : No reason given.


Evolution is not science. It did not create life nor did it diversify life. It didn;t create the laws that exist nor did it create science. It is a religion and not Science.

Intelligent design always defeats evolutions lack of design and lack of intelligence. Luck and Chance is not a scientific doctrine,


This message is a reply to:
 Message 51 by RAZD, posted 06-02-2017 2:08 PM RAZD has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 53 by RAZD, posted 06-03-2017 5:45 AM Davidjay has responded

  
Davidjay 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1261 days)
Posts: 1026
From: B.C Canada
Joined: 11-05-2004


Message 54 of 56 (810919)
06-03-2017 5:55 AM
Reply to: Message 53 by RAZD
06-03-2017 5:45 AM


Re:Razz's razz
Scientific sounding jargon doesnt cover up or excuse your lack of straight forward answers.

Inbreeding does not produce new kinds...... no matter how long you breed your dogs together.

Double speak does not hide, this obvious truth.

My belief is correct scientifically and you know it, or should know it, if you studied any biology at all. Your denials show desperation in your lost cause. Inbreeding is not a proof of evolution, but a ploy of evolutionist to con their congregations into their false belief system.


Evolution is not science. It did not create life nor did it diversify life. It didn;t create the laws that exist nor did it create science. It is a religion and not Science.

Intelligent design always defeats evolutions lack of design and lack of intelligence. Luck and Chance is not a scientific doctrine,


This message is a reply to:
 Message 53 by RAZD, posted 06-03-2017 5:45 AM RAZD has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 55 by RAZD, posted 06-03-2017 6:11 AM Davidjay has not yet responded

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2021