Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,419 Year: 3,676/9,624 Month: 547/974 Week: 160/276 Day: 34/23 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Can the creationist model explain the data?
Tangle
Member
Posts: 9504
From: UK
Joined: 10-07-2011
Member Rating: 4.7


Message 35 of 67 (811542)
06-09-2017 6:33 AM
Reply to: Message 34 by CRR
06-09-2017 6:17 AM


CRR writes:
Oh FFS give us a decent reference; not a Google search.
Pot, let me introduce you to kettle.
CRR writes:
quote:
Textbooks often claim common descent is supported using the example of a tree of animals based upon the enzyme cytochrome c which matches the traditional evolutionary tree based upon morphology. However, textbooks rarely mention that the tree based upon a different enzyme, cytochrome b, sharply conflicts with the standard evolutionary tree.
Problem 6: Molecular Biology Has Failed to Yield a Grand “Tree of Life” | Evolution News
quote:
The articles published at Evolution News are copyright by Discovery Institute and/or the respective authors and shouldn’t be republished without permission. For permission to reprint, contact editor@evolutionnews.org.

Je suis Charlie. Je suis Ahmed. Je suis Juif. Je suis Parisien. I am Mancunian. I am Brum. I am London.
"Life, don't talk to me about life" - Marvin the Paranoid Android
"Science adjusts it's views based on what's observed.
Faith is the denial of observation so that Belief can be preserved."
- Tim Minchin, in his beat poem, Storm.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 34 by CRR, posted 06-09-2017 6:17 AM CRR has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 39 by CRR, posted 06-09-2017 7:45 PM Tangle has replied

  
Tangle
Member
Posts: 9504
From: UK
Joined: 10-07-2011
Member Rating: 4.7


(1)
Message 41 of 67 (811635)
06-10-2017 2:59 AM
Reply to: Message 39 by CRR
06-09-2017 7:45 PM


CRR writes:
I gave a quote from and a link to a single relevant article which is fair dealing and not a breach of copyright.
In contrast RAZD gave a link to a Google search.
You gave us a link to an essay on a discredited creationist web site run by the dicredited Discovery Institute. Their 'work' is not science, is not peer reviewed nor is it published through scientific channels. It's a corrupt organisation.
RAZD gave you a Google results page with numerous reputable sources of information on fruit fly research.
Can you see the difference?

Je suis Charlie. Je suis Ahmed. Je suis Juif. Je suis Parisien. I am Mancunian. I am Brum. I am London.
"Life, don't talk to me about life" - Marvin the Paranoid Android
"Science adjusts it's views based on what's observed.
Faith is the denial of observation so that Belief can be preserved."
- Tim Minchin, in his beat poem, Storm.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 39 by CRR, posted 06-09-2017 7:45 PM CRR has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024