|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 61 (9209 total) |
| |
The Rutificador chile | |
Total: 919,506 Year: 6,763/9,624 Month: 103/238 Week: 20/83 Day: 3/0 Hour: 0/3 |
Thread ▼ Details |
Member (Idle past 2750 days) Posts: 2965 From: Los Angeles, CA USA Joined: |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Was Adam Packin' Heat? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18651 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 4.2 |
An omnipotent being would have an infinite number of penises (penes, penii), by definition. And infinite testicles. Sounds a bit like our president! He'd be capable of screwing everyone else and everything else at the same time.Chance as a real force is a myth. It has no basis in reality and no place in scientific inquiry. For science and philosophy to continue to advance in knowledge, chance must be demythologized once and for all. —RC Sproul "A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." —Mark Twain " ~"If that's not sufficient for you go soak your head."~Faith "as long as chance rules, God is an anachronism."~Arthur Koestler
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Davidjay  Suspended Member (Idle past 2587 days) Posts: 1026 From: B.C Canada Joined: |
Phat are you posting as a member or as a 'moderator ? As a member I can more easily respond to your posts rather than if you are a moderator, looking to moderate or make one conform and agree ..
Evolution is not science. It did not create life nor did it diversify life. It didn;t create the laws that exist nor did it create science. It is a religion and not Science. Intelligent design always defeats evolutions lack of design and lack of intelligence. Luck and Chance is not a scientific doctrine,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Davidjay  Suspended Member (Idle past 2587 days) Posts: 1026 From: B.C Canada Joined: |
Ringo, thanks for illustrating an insincere question, that you supposedly want an answer to. The religious scribes and pharisees and the self righteous used to try this trick innumerable times against Jesus. And He only answered for the sake of those listening, or if HERE, only for those READERS (who were not yet hardcore religious evolutionaries).
God made Adam and Eve without using a womb. He was taking a shortcut already by getting Mary pregnant. So it doesn't make any sense whatsoever for the Holy Spirit to have a womb.
You as with atheists and evolutionists think a cute question might stump a Christian, a creationist or the Lord Himself. You think you can mock the Lord through a dumb ignorant trick question ? Sorry I know your tricks, and can find no way to help READERS think about Jesus and truths from your ignorant trick question.Evolution is not science. It did not create life nor did it diversify life. It didn;t create the laws that exist nor did it create science. It is a religion and not Science. Intelligent design always defeats evolutions lack of design and lack of intelligence. Luck and Chance is not a scientific doctrine,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
bluegenes Member (Idle past 2735 days) Posts: 3119 From: U.K. Joined:
|
Davidjay writes: No, it's the package that keeps on giving, even though you evolutionists try to neuter the truth and neuter opposition. Why would we need to neuter an impotent opposition?
Davidjay writes: I love winning, and I love proving that evolutionists can not stand the heat and are not packin, except for packin up and leavin... What you actually do is continually make unsupported claims, then declare victory. That's like a five year old repeatedly stating that Santa Claus brings the Christmas presents, then childishly considering his unsupported declaration to be evidence or proof of the claim in itself.
"I win because I said it is so", says the kid, as he sticks his tongue out and stamps his foot.
Davidjay writes: Onward Christian Soldiers. Jesus wins again. And why? Because you said so. Don't blame others for your inability to support creationist claims, your own impotence. You are self-neutered.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 670 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Davidjay writes:
Well, I didn't expect an answer. The question was meant to underscore your asinine point.
Ringo, thanks for illustrating an insincere question, that you supposedly want an answer to.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Davidjay  Suspended Member (Idle past 2587 days) Posts: 1026 From: B.C Canada Joined: |
Your asinine point is behind you..... even if it makes you uncomfortable.
The Lord had a 'maximus' behind and in front... as Moses saw it. The Lord was not a blob as in Star Wars or as imagined by atheists and evolutionists, the Lord had a magnificient body, and gave that exact image and its technology and spirituality potenials to us according to the design and proportions. But evolutionists dont know math and atheists hate math and refuse to study the design of their own bodies. Atheists and evolutionists hate science and oppose science. Deal with it.. or study the truth of our bodys design MathematicalProofHumanDesign1 Edited by Davidjay, : No reason given.Evolution is not science. It did not create life nor did it diversify life. It didn;t create the laws that exist nor did it create science. It is a religion and not Science. Intelligent design always defeats evolutions lack of design and lack of intelligence. Luck and Chance is not a scientific doctrine,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Coyote Member (Idle past 2364 days) Posts: 6117 Joined: |
Atheists and evolutionists hate science and oppose science. On the contrary: it is fundamentalists such as yourself who hate and opposes science because science shows that your beliefs are wrong. Good example: the YEC belief is totally disproved by scientific dating, and the belief in a global flood ca. 4350 years ago is totally disproved by many fields of science. Even my archaeological research disproves it! But of course you won't address that evidence, you just keep on posting nonsense and unsupported claims, boasting of victory, and trolling. Reminds me of Pigeon Chess. Edited by Coyote, : spellingReligious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge. Belief gets in the way of learning--Robert A. Heinlein In the name of diversity, college student demands to be kept in ignorance of the culture that made diversity a value--StultisTheFool It's not what we don't know that hurts, it's what we know that ain't so--Will Rogers If I am entitled to something, someone else is obliged to pay--Jerry Pournelle If a religion's teachings are true, then it should have nothing to fear from science...--dwise1 "Multiculturalism" demands that the US be tolerant of everything except its own past, culture, traditions, and identity. Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and offended to discover that there are other points of view--William F. Buckley Jr.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 670 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Davidjay writes:
According to Exodus 33, what Moses saw was God's "glory". Think of a very bright light. You can't look at it directly without damaging your eyesight but if it's pointed away from you - i.e. you're behind it - you can see it reflected from other objects.
The Lord had a 'maximus' behind and in front... as Moses saw it.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Davidjay  Suspended Member (Idle past 2587 days) Posts: 1026 From: B.C Canada Joined: |
I quess you speak from experience, or are you making up another theory... on a theory of a theory. Or are you just hoping by luck and chance to have made up a new excuse for you not believeing what is before your eyes.
Moses saw the Lord in all His glory, meaning totally naked and beautiful and emanating, as clothes do not do the Lord justice, as His BODY is as magnificent as magnificent gets...which is why viewers fell down on their faces when seeing him or his angels. Have some respect Ringo, or viewers, because in your pride and arrogancy, you just have no idea of what ground you tread upon, when you deny the Lord his GLORY and POWER. Anyway, for the sake of READERS and not you Ringo, again note how Jesus was before their eyes and was real, even after his resurrection, witnessed and realised by doubting Thomas. So much so that he declared 'MY LORD and MY GOD' and he believed forever til his death, without doubting. Jesus was seen, Jesus was real, if you accept Jesus you can and will see Jesus.... a promise is a promise, whether now or in the future. SeeingJesuspreventsSuicide FaceofJesusThanks to the webmasters HERE for allowing me to defeat atheists and evolutionists HERE, and show they have no math, no science backing them up and that they are totally dependant on semantics and luck and chance as their only support for their religion. Thanks again...
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 670 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Davidjay writes:
I speak from reading the Bible. You should try it sometime instead of making up your own stories.
I quess you speak from experience.... Davidjay writes:
Why do you accept that story as written but you make up a lot of silly nonsense about the story in Exodus?
Anyway, for the sake of READERS and not you Ringo, again note how Jesus was before their eyes and was real, even after his resurrection, witnessed and realised by doubting Thomas.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Davidjay  Suspended Member (Idle past 2587 days) Posts: 1026 From: B.C Canada Joined: |
You must learn to explain yourself Ringo and learn to be clear... try using more than one sentence in your honest query or try to clear your mind beforehand. Maybe get rid of the ****** THEREIN.
Anyway the Bible is literal and when it is mysterious, it always explains the text later to the Lords people (SEE Prophecy, especially Daniel 2,4,5,7,8,9,11,12) As for exodus, the first one was literal and the second one is literal and even more IMPORTANT 2ndExodus2 The main verses being Jeremiah 51:6-9,13Mathew 24:16 ... Revelations 12:15,16 I Corinthians 10:11 Revelations 12:6 Micah 7:15 Hosea 2:1 & 15 Esdras 15:11 Zechariah 2, 9, 10 Amos 9:11 Joel 2:28-31 Ezekiel 34:13 -25 Jeremiah 23:3,6 John 10:16 Edited by Davidjay, : No reason given.Thanks to the webmasters HERE for allowing me to defeat atheists and evolutionists HERE, and show they have no math, no science backing them up and that they are totally dependant on semantics and luck and chance as their only support for their religion. Thanks again...
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 670 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Davidjay writes:
Some of it is and some of it isn't. Do you think Psalm 23 was written by a literal sheep or a figurative sheep?
Anyway the Bible is literal.... Davidjay writes:
That's what I'm saying. What the text actually SAYS is nothing about God's naughty bits. You're the one who is adding a fanciful interpretation.
As for exodus, the first one was literal....
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Davidjay  Suspended Member (Idle past 2587 days) Posts: 1026 From: B.C Canada Joined: |
Don't blame others for your inability to support creationist claims, your own impotence. You are self-neutered. Nah, I and my wife of my youth have done our part and brought five new souls into the world via the Lords created method and his amazing and beautiful reproductive system.. Not into neutering, but believe in obeying the first commandment. "Be fruitful and multiply"...... great math once you get the hang of it. Its easier than you think.... I mean addition is fantastic, but multiplying is even greater.... what a thrill, all by design. Amazing DESIGN..... never deny design.... Thats the real BIG BANG....Thanks to the webmasters HERE for allowing me to defeat atheists and evolutionists HERE, and show they have no math, no science backing them up and that they are totally dependant on semantics and luck and chance as their only support for their religion. Thanks again...
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
bluegenes Member (Idle past 2735 days) Posts: 3119 From: U.K. Joined: |
Davidjay writes: Nah, I and my wife of my youth have done our part and brought five new souls into the world via the Lords created method and his amazing and beautiful reproductive system......Thats the real BIG BANG.... I'm glad to hear about the fledgling jays, and that you've enjoyed at least five "BIG BANGS", but I was referring to the impotence of your "arguments", not your reproductive capacity.
David writes: "Be fruitful and multiply"...... great math once you get the hang of it. Its easier than you think.... I mean addition is fantastic, but multiplying is even greater.... what a thrill, all by design. Amazing DESIGN..... never deny design.... Presumably the Lord's penus and teticules weren't intelligently designed. But does he follow his own advice to be fruitful and multiply, and use his reproductive apparatus (or apparatis) to produce godlets or demigods? Or is it just decorative?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AdminPhat Inactive Member |
Terminal off topic drift. Closing for now...
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024