I didn't really like my previous response. In the interests of honesty and openness, I didn't eliminate it; I've hidden the text in case anyone wants to read it and reply to it.
What I should have said is this:
When I see a response like the one you just gave, I don't know what to make of it. I don't know whether you're just ranting out of frustration, or whether you really do think that I literally believe what you said I believe.
I also don't know whether you're trying to provoke a similar response from me, or whether you're trying to end the conversation but don't want to give me the last word.
I am a bit disappointed that you don't feel that I'm worth your time or effort. But fair enough; there are people I don't feel are worth my time, either, so I can't complain.
-
Well, you're the one that mentioned Trump's "vetting process". I'm asking what the status on his vetting process is.
It could be that they really are working on reviewing the current process for vetting refugees and immigrants and that they really are developing an improvement for that process.
I'm a bit disappointed, though, that you don't feel that I'm worth your time or effort to engage in a kind of, almost civil discussion. But fair enough; there are people who I don't find are worth my time to talk to, so I can't really complain.
I suspect, though, that all they really intend to do is scream about how the courts and the Democrats and the Communists are blocking their efforts to "make America great again" because that seems to work in getting their base all fired up.
Have you heard anything about this "vetting process" that's supposed to be an improvement over what we already have?
Edited by Chiroptera, : No reason given.
Edited by Chiroptera, : edited the hidden part
Edited by Chiroptera, : Last visible paragraph disappeared in the last edit somehow. Grr.
Freedom is merely privilege extended, unless enjoyed by one and all. — Billy Bragg
™ Version 4.2
