Evidence of the flood

But in your column, there actually are no rocks.You are conflating the time scale with stratigraphic columns that are different everywhere in the world.

THE STRATA ALL SAG INTO THE BASIN AS A UNIT.

WHATY A WACKO STATEMENT. THEY ARE ALL ROCKS THAT MAKE UP THE STRATA. EVERYWHERE IN THE WORLD.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

You don't have any arguments that work. Every argument you've made has been rebutted. Most of those rebuttals are still sitting out there unaddressed.But it goes beyond arguments. Most of the time you can't even get your facts straight. Replying to you is an exercise in tedium as the errors in each and every sentence have to be identified and corrected.--Percy

But it is being in sequence with.In your scenario, the Coconino is not continuous with the Hermit, and yet you say that they are part of a continuous flood deposit.

JUST STOP REPLYING TO ME, THAT WILL SOLVE YOUR PROBLEM.

That does not explain the features that I just mentioned.

IN MY SCENARIO THE COCONINO CERTAINLY IS CONTINUOUS WITH THE HERMIT.

THE SAGGING PREEMPTS EVERYTHING ELSE.

But the geological column is different at virtually every location in the world.

Which means nothing.The sequence of events is clear.

DIFFERENT SEDIMENTS BUT SO WHAT, SAME FORM

Except for the unconformity between them.

YOU BET ITS CLEAR. STRATA ALL LAID DOWN AND THEN IT ALL SAGS DUE TO THE SALT LAYER

OH THAT IMAGINARY UNCONFORMITY? HA HA.