Understanding through Discussion

Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 66 (9078 total)
718 online now:
Dredge, nwr, PaulK, Tangle, vimesey (5 members, 713 visitors)
Newest Member: harveyspecter
Post Volume: Total: 895,150 Year: 6,262/6,534 Month: 455/650 Week: 225/278 Day: 21/44 Hour: 4/7

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Author Topic:   Lucy (Australopithecus)
Member (Idle past 19 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005

Message 85 of 88 (820409)
09-20-2017 8:42 AM
Reply to: Message 64 by Porkncheese
09-16-2017 3:04 PM

Re: Confession
How wonderful to see an honest to goodness creo meltdown on EvC after so long.


Brings a tear to my eye.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53

The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286

Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 64 by Porkncheese, posted 09-16-2017 3:04 PM Porkncheese has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 86 by RAZD, posted 09-20-2017 9:15 AM Larni has not replied
 Message 87 by Pressie, posted 09-20-2017 9:36 AM Larni has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022