If evolution is wrong, is Creation right?

But he did offer you an explanation. He shown how an animal never becomes a different one. Can you show under experiment a human change into another kind?
Are you saing there is no humans because there is no kinds. Come on Crash - you wouldn't say that just for the "kinds" debate would you? Yes. But like you - he can't believe this unless he sees it. You know, like that God person you seek evidence for.------------------------------------------
Dear Mike---
Welcome to the forum. A lot of people have said if evolution is not the truth Creation can't be. But if they're honest - they can't possibly know that for sure.An evo once told me " we all believe in abiogenesis "It's rather amusing since I believe in Genesis - You know, that original word = Creation. SO, Creation is a "absolute certainty" whereas evolution can be called a mere fact. Infact I personally would just call it a theory - as I have never seen it happen. People may say you're dogmatic e.t.c - it's best to shrug things like that off and stick to your guns, I can't see anything wrong with what you've said.

I don't know - I only know Neanderthal man seems to be human. As for the other extinct creatures, they look like apes creatures to me. But PLEASE let's not do a "line of" - I have accepted a "line of" is certainly evidence of diversity from an incredible Creator - and POSSIBLY evolution. But I am talking about absolute certainty do remember.Dan - Leave me alone.

Well - I mean, I think "kinds" is more correct than "no kinds".It is TOTALLY true that we produce after our kind. If you claim to not know what this means then you're are just being dishonest with yourselves. We all know what a dog is, are you saying you don't?As evolutionists say this is very simple " cats and dogs " . We know that an apple will never become an orange. We know that a peerson will never become an ape. That may be simplistic, but it holds truth.
Maybe it's not helpful in biology, like you said, but the barrier is REAL untill we see a kind change.

Ofcourse I don't mean to start an old battle of Uniformatarianism and Catastrophism but "the present is the key to the past" disregards the possibility of the past being a different place from the present. Take for instance in the days of Genesis, "it was good" and go look at it from the Catastrophism perspective and you'll have a new set of rules.