Author
|
Topic: Age Correlations and An Old Earth, Version 2 No 1
|
starman
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 647 of 1498 (823354)
11-09-2017 12:38 PM
|
Reply to: Message 636 by ringo 11-08-2017 2:30 PM
|
|
Re: Correlations Correlations Correlations
Reality is not constrained to under your nose or your back yard actually. Reality includes the future and past, not just the current nature on earth! Evos should be fined heavily for even using the word reality!
This message is a reply to: | | Message 636 by ringo, posted 11-08-2017 2:30 PM | | ringo has replied |
|
starman
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 648 of 1498 (823355)
11-09-2017 12:39 PM
|
Reply to: Message 647 by starman 11-09-2017 12:38 PM
|
|
Re: Correlations Correlations Correlations
No. A lot of the ratios are missing. You claim they decayed away millions of imaginary years ago! Then, of what is here, you invoke magic dunkings and resurfacing of the entire area with NO evidence. Work on your fable. Pathetic.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 647 by starman, posted 11-09-2017 12:38 PM | | starman has not replied |
|
starman
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 656 of 1498 (823384)
11-09-2017 4:06 PM
|
Reply to: Message 649 by Tangle 11-09-2017 12:41 PM
|
|
You can't...someone has to. Good grief.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 649 by Tangle, posted 11-09-2017 12:41 PM | | Tangle has not replied |
|
starman
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 657 of 1498 (823385)
11-09-2017 4:08 PM
|
Reply to: Message 650 by jar 11-09-2017 12:43 PM
|
|
Re: Correlations Correlations Correlations
So what? Obviously some sort of reaction happened. The missing isotopes you say were once there are needed in a same state reaction. The magic dunks and resurfacing is needed. Etc. You have no prof for any of it you just need it to be so.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 650 by jar, posted 11-09-2017 12:43 PM | | jar has replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 662 by jar, posted 11-09-2017 5:12 PM | | starman has not replied |
|
starman
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 658 of 1498 (823386)
11-09-2017 4:09 PM
|
Reply to: Message 651 by jar 11-09-2017 12:46 PM
|
|
Rocks your world when someone doesn't believe your fables eh?
This message is a reply to: | | Message 651 by jar, posted 11-09-2017 12:46 PM | | jar has not replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 666 by ringo, posted 11-10-2017 10:54 AM | | starman has replied | | Message 674 by RAZD, posted 11-10-2017 12:35 PM | | starman has not replied |
|
starman
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 659 of 1498 (823387)
11-09-2017 4:10 PM
|
Reply to: Message 653 by RAZD 11-09-2017 1:24 PM
|
|
Re: Starman fails again to address the issues or provide evidence.
Absurdly false. You have NO idea what a ring grown in the former nature would/should look like. You have shown no close up shots of rings of the ages in question. Why talk?
This message is a reply to: | | Message 653 by RAZD, posted 11-09-2017 1:24 PM | | RAZD has replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 663 by RAZD, posted 11-10-2017 7:22 AM | | starman has replied |
|
starman
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 660 of 1498 (823388)
11-09-2017 4:12 PM
|
Reply to: Message 654 by RAZD 11-09-2017 1:27 PM
|
|
Re: Oklo and Uranium Halos show an Old Earth
Summary written? What post? Pony up.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 654 by RAZD, posted 11-09-2017 1:27 PM | | RAZD has replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 664 by RAZD, posted 11-10-2017 7:37 AM | | starman has replied |
|
starman
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 661 of 1498 (823389)
11-09-2017 4:13 PM
|
Reply to: Message 655 by Tangle 11-09-2017 3:03 PM
|
|
Let us guess, you would fight a real good fight if it wasn't beneath you to step in the ring. Sure.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 655 by Tangle, posted 11-09-2017 3:03 PM | | Tangle has not replied |
|
starman
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 667 of 1498 (823444)
11-10-2017 12:00 PM
|
Reply to: Message 663 by RAZD 11-10-2017 7:22 AM
|
|
Re: Starman fails again to address the issues or provide evidence. Fail #36
False, you have no idea what rings grown fast in the forner nature would or should look like! Your attempted point is that if the nature was the same, THEN fast grown rings would look a certain way. You guys are not here to debate but to preach!
This message is a reply to: | | Message 663 by RAZD, posted 11-10-2017 7:22 AM | | RAZD has seen this message but not replied |
|
starman
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 668 of 1498 (823445)
11-10-2017 12:01 PM
|
Reply to: Message 666 by ringo 11-10-2017 10:54 AM
|
|
You are not here to debate but to air hatred of God and Christians.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 666 by ringo, posted 11-10-2017 10:54 AM | | ringo has replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 671 by ringo, posted 11-10-2017 12:08 PM | | starman has replied | | Message 676 by Phat, posted 11-12-2017 1:58 PM | | starman has not replied |
|
starman
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 669 of 1498 (823446)
11-10-2017 12:01 PM
|
Reply to: Message 665 by ringo 11-10-2017 10:50 AM
|
|
Re: Correlations Correlations Correlations
Either try to evidence your claimed nature in the past or you may not use it in models. Period. Evermore.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 665 by ringo, posted 11-10-2017 10:50 AM | | ringo has replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 672 by ringo, posted 11-10-2017 12:10 PM | | starman has not replied |
|
starman
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 670 of 1498 (823447)
11-10-2017 12:05 PM
|
Reply to: Message 664 by RAZD 11-10-2017 7:37 AM
|
|
Re: Oklo and Uranium Halos show an Old Earth
I see something about a short lived isotope within rocks. Is your attempted point that there had to be decay because something was in a rock? Be clear. You see, when forces and laws come into being, atoms obey those forces wherever they are, I would think. If our present nature came to exist after the stuff was in a rock, explain why the new forces would not act on on that stuff anyhow?
This message is a reply to: | | Message 664 by RAZD, posted 11-10-2017 7:37 AM | | RAZD has seen this message but not replied |
|
starman
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 673 of 1498 (823454)
11-10-2017 12:16 PM
|
Reply to: Message 671 by ringo 11-10-2017 12:08 PM
|
|
To anyone having some actual point of discussion or debate....I will check my blog. I am suspending EVC from my posts for a few weeks or maybe forever, we'll see. end transmission
This message is a reply to: | | Message 671 by ringo, posted 11-10-2017 12:08 PM | | ringo has seen this message but not replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 675 by RAZD, posted 11-10-2017 2:01 PM | | starman has not replied |
|