Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,419 Year: 3,676/9,624 Month: 547/974 Week: 160/276 Day: 0/34 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Modern Democratic Socialized Capitalism is not Evil
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 11 of 43 (824800)
12-03-2017 6:44 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by RAZD
12-02-2017 2:06 PM


It is time for corporations to become democratically operated institutions.
What is your route for going about it? And what's stopping you?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by RAZD, posted 12-02-2017 2:06 PM RAZD has seen this message but not replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 12 of 43 (824801)
12-03-2017 6:45 PM
Reply to: Message 10 by ringo
12-03-2017 1:26 PM


Re: Common Ownership
Oligarchies exist because SOME people want to get ahead of their neighbours.
They're also profitable...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by ringo, posted 12-03-2017 1:26 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 14 by RAZD, posted 12-03-2017 11:46 PM New Cat's Eye has replied
 Message 18 by ringo, posted 12-04-2017 10:57 AM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 20 of 43 (824852)
12-04-2017 11:18 AM
Reply to: Message 14 by RAZD
12-03-2017 11:46 PM


Re: Common Ownership
Me in msg 11 writes:
RAZD writes:
It is time for corporations to become democratically operated institutions.
What is your route for going about it? And what's stopping you?
RAZD has acknowledged this reply
You really have no answers for these questions? What are you going on about, then?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by RAZD, posted 12-03-2017 11:46 PM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 24 by RAZD, posted 12-05-2017 3:47 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 21 of 43 (824854)
12-04-2017 11:22 AM
Reply to: Message 18 by ringo
12-04-2017 10:57 AM


Re: Common Ownership
Yeah, oligarchies exist because some people want to get ahead and also because they work well at doing that.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by ringo, posted 12-04-2017 10:57 AM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 22 by ringo, posted 12-04-2017 11:26 AM New Cat's Eye has seen this message but not replied
 Message 23 by RAZD, posted 12-05-2017 3:40 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 25 of 43 (824961)
12-05-2017 4:30 PM
Reply to: Message 24 by RAZD
12-05-2017 3:47 PM


Re: Common Ownership
From Message 23:
Yeah, oligarchies exist because some people want to get ahead ...
... and some people are sociopaths that don't care diddly about other people.
Also, there are perfectly normal people who go all amoral when making business decisions. It's like "It's just business!" is supposed to be some bullshit phrase where you don't have to act morally, or something.
I dunno, it's weird.
Not surprisingly capitalism appears to selects for sociopaths to run ruthless companies, as they are disproportionately represented.
It's a lot easier to make amoral business decisions when you don't have morals to begin with.
Oligarchies exist because rich and powerful people are remarkably effective at getting their way and suppressing poor people.
Oligarchies are also an effective way to run a business.
From Message 24:
Raising peoples awareness for starters. Like yours.
I'll let you know if/when it gets raised.
Because you are (a) in denial about the value of democracy v oligarchy
Where did I deny that?
(b) your actual value.
I think that was supposed to be me being in denial of my actual value. It's not that I deny it, its that I don't care about it.
Just because you make more than other people and are comfortable in your economic situation, because you are doing better than those on minimum wage.
That's a lie.
Curiously, I would have thought that was self evident.
Sorry, I assumed you were better than this.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by RAZD, posted 12-05-2017 3:47 PM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 26 by RAZD, posted 12-06-2017 11:35 AM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 28 of 43 (825051)
12-06-2017 8:45 PM
Reply to: Message 26 by RAZD
12-06-2017 11:35 AM


Re: Common Ownership
Curiously effectiveness does not necessarily equal good or equitable.
Sure, but it determines success. Don't you think oligarchies are more effective than co-ops, be it good or bad? Isn't that a part of why they've been more successful?
Because you are (a) in denial about the value of democracy v oligarchy
Where did I deny that?
Well I kinda get that impression every time you say things like "Oligarchies are also an effective way to run a business" and (Message 96) "I think another part of it is that it's harder to get a bunch of people to agree and take responsibility for everything than it is to just have one motherfucker in charge of the whole thing."
But I'm not denying the value of co-ops. I'm just recognizing a particular value of oligarchies there. Your impression is irrational and untrue.
Look, I get it. Co-ops are cool. I just don't see them working as well and I'm not sure how your goal is going to be accomplished.
Here, what if I used a different approach:
Dude, I'm so convinced. It is time for corporations to become democratically operated institutions. Here's my questions:
What is your route for going about it? And what's stopping you?
I think that was supposed to be me being in denial of my actual value. It's not that I deny it, its that I don't care about it.
Well, that's one way to resolve cognitive dissonance.
But I'm not dissonant
That's a lie.
You are free to think so.
It's also true.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 26 by RAZD, posted 12-06-2017 11:35 AM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 29 by RAZD, posted 12-09-2017 12:11 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 30 of 43 (825232)
12-10-2017 10:50 AM
Reply to: Message 29 by RAZD
12-09-2017 12:11 PM


Re: Common Opportunity
Sure, but it determines success. Don't you think oligarchies are more effective than co-ops, be it good or bad? Isn't that a part of why they've been more successful?
Depends on your definitions of effective and success.
In this context, it is the effectiveness of the running of the business and it is measured by how successful that business is - that is, how much business they are doing.
Oligarchies do more business than co-ops and so they are more successful. The question is why. Your explanation is basically that people are evil. I'm saying that from a business perspective, oligarchies work better.
Dude, I'm so convinced. It is time for corporations to become democratically operated institutions. Here's my questions:
What is your route for going about it? ...
Education, political advocating, raising people's awareness, communication, demonstrations, etc
How's that working out for you?
... And what's stopping you?
What makes you think I'm stopped.
I see a lot of oligarchies and not very many co-ops. The oligarchies seem to be winning.
Or that it will happen overnight?
It is certainly not happening overnight. Is it happening at all?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 29 by RAZD, posted 12-09-2017 12:11 PM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 35 by RAZD, posted 12-15-2017 11:18 AM New Cat's Eye has seen this message but not replied
 Message 38 by RAZD, posted 12-20-2017 9:56 AM New Cat's Eye has not replied
 Message 43 by RAZD, posted 12-21-2017 7:44 AM New Cat's Eye has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024