How strong would the magnetic field have to be to block cosmic rays from interacting with nitrogen in the upper atmosphere? What are the formulas for this calculations? Are there any other considerations needed to be taken into? Sunspot cycles?
Not only do the sunspot cycles show up in the tree ring vs
14C data but you have annual data from the tree rings that shows an overall trend for
14C decay that matches the exponential decay curve.
IFF there is some process that causes hundreds of tree rings to be formed in one day, THEN there must be a mechanism to exactly create the
14C data in the tree rings -- from ring to ring to ring to ring.
The sunspot data also shows up in the Berillium-10 data in lake varves and ice cores
Message 6,
The Age of the Earth (version 3 no 1 part 2):
Linking ice cores and other climate archives(1)
quote:
Beryllium-10 records from ice cores ... can also be used to link ice cores with tree ring chronologies. The method uses that the atmosphere's Carbon-14 (14C) and Beryllium-10 concentrations share a common signal. The fundamental idea is that the production rates of 14C and 10Be vary in the same way because the two isotopes are produced by similar processes in the atmosphere. ...
The Berillium-10 is a radioactive isotope with a half-life of 1.39 10
^6 years
(3), and thus decays slowely; it is removed from the atmosphere by gravity and deposited on the surface. ...
The solar sunspot cycle will be discussed in Part 3, Radiometric and Cosmogenic Measuring Systems, along with it's effect on the 14C record.
This is an anchored chronology with an error of +/-1 year that we can compare directly (wiggle-match) with the 10Be data in the ice cores, so we have 3 accurate and precise ways to tether the ice core chronology to the present day -- tree frost rings, 10Be to 14C wiggle-match, and d10Be to 10Be wiggle-match. This gives us a very precise and accurate start for the ice core data.
So you need a system to explain the Berillium-10 data as well, data with a different embeded decay correlation.
This means you can posit without evidence a system to produce a 10% reduction in the production of Carbon-14 to bollix the carbon data, but you then need to produce a different, smaller, reduction in the production of Berillium-10 for the same layer -- as well as hyper-production of ice layers and lake varve layers.
The only answer that comes close is magic by god/s intentionally fabricating deceiving evidence.
Enjoy
Edited by RAZD, : .
Edited by RAZD, : day not year
™ Version 4.2
(1)
