Faith writes:
I do wish it would be acknowledged that just because my views have been "rebutted" doesn't mean the rebuttal is automatically correct,
Nobody is claiming that the rebuttals are "automatically" correct. A proof that 1+1=2 might not be a valid proof even if the conclusion is correct. In fact, we do see some disagreement among your opponents about the details of the rebuttals.
But what they have is a vast network of rebuttals that all point to the same conclusion --> Your explanation doesn't work. You're complaining that one beam won't hold up the Empire State building and you're right - but they don't have one beam, they have thousands.
An honest discussion is more of a peer review than a pep rally. My toughest critics here are the people who agree with me. -- ringo
™ Version 4.2
