|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 61 (9209 total) |
| |
The Rutificador chile | |
Total: 919,506 Year: 6,763/9,624 Month: 103/238 Week: 20/83 Day: 3/0 Hour: 0/3 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: The roots of Creation Science and Darwinism | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Astronomy Junior Member (Idle past 2231 days) Posts: 25 Joined: |
DEFINITION
Darwinian Evolution (Darwinism) is the inconsistent and unfair following the principle: laws of energy-momentum conservation (as well as all other conservations) are always valid. Even in the Virtual Big Bang. However this road leads to self-denial and lies: Science v s God Its The Collapse Of Physics As We Know it Science v s God Its The Collapse Of Physics As We Know it - video Dailymotion "Michio Kaku - The Universe Shouldn't Exist" https://youtu.be/esPXpagkVwY However nihilism (the atheism is its expression) is not the announced "absence of Absolute Truth", but simply the "art to lie without a shame". DEFINITONCreation Science (or simply Creationism) is the freedom from unfair and blind demand to follow the conservation laws in physics. DEFINITIONThe Nature is what Standard Instruments do measure (at least in principle), and Instruments are what measure the Nature. Shortly: Time is what the clock shows (Albert Einstein). This way the definition of Nature became free from our body-senses. DEFINITIONSpirituality, and divinity — is what can not be measured by Standard Instruments. For example: your love to mom has no physical temperature, has no physical pressure. So, spirituality is not part of the Nature. Spirituality is not natural. THEOREMActions of spiritual beings always violate the conservation laws of Nature. PROOF: spiritual being is not part of Nature. However, the behaviour of Nature under the influence of spiritual beings is describable by addition several terms (functions and fields) into the equations of Nature. For example, the Newton Second Law a m = F (the m is mass of body, the a is acceleration of body, F is physical force acting on body) can fully describe the levitation and telekinesis by addition of the force-field K (with no natural source). So, a m = F + K. THEOREMDark Matter and Dark Energy are source-less (it means with no natural source) terms A and B in Einstein Equation: G+A+B=8pi f T, where G is Einstein tensor, T is energy-momentum tensor of natural matter. The field f with values 0 or 1 is also spiritual influence, it describes Creation and Destruction of natural objects. PROOF Spiritual source can not be measured, like the Dark Matter and Dark Energy are known only by their influence on Nature: the CERN has not detected Dark Matter. The gravitation (its interaction of Nature with the Dark Matter) can not be seen as material interaction, because there is no force of gravity in Einstein calculations, indeed, the free-falling object feels no gravity force. CONSPIRACY OF ACADEMIC SCIENCEThe proof, that without the spiritual terms (like K, A, f, and B, which are space and time functions with no limiting conditions on them) the mathematics of Academic Science is not self-consistent: Just a moment... There can not be divine-less model of Nature. The spiritual beings and God are necessary. Edited by Astronomy, : I have added words about Dark Matter, Dark Energy, and Creation and Destruction of Nature.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AdminModulous Administrator (Idle past 243 days) Posts: 897 Joined: |
Thread copied here from the The roots of Creation Science and Darwinism thread in the Proposed New Topics forum.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 426 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
Edited by AdminModulous, : content hidden
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NoNukes Inactive Member
|
However, the behaviour of Nature under the influence of spiritual beings is describable by addition several terms (functions and fields) into the equations of Nature. For example, the Newton Second Law a m = F (the m is mass of body, the a is acceleration of body, F is physical force acting on body) can fully describe the levitation and telekinesis by addition of the force-field K (with no natural source). So, a m = F + K. ICANT, could you field this one? Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also in prison. Thoreau: Civil Disobedience (1846) "Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, the wretched refuse of your teeming shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me, I lift my lamp beside the golden door! We got a thousand points of light for the homeless man. We've got a kinder, gentler, machine gun hand. Neil Young, Rockin' in the Free World. Worrying about the "browning of America" is not racism. -- Faith I hate you all, you hate me -- Faith No it is based on math I studied in sixth grade, just plain old addition, substraction and multiplication. -- ICANT
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Modulous Member (Idle past 243 days) Posts: 7801 From: Manchester, UK Joined: |
Darwinian Evolution (Darwinism) is the inconsistent and unfair following the principle: laws of energy-momentum conservation (as well as all other conservations) are always valid. Nah - evolution can be true AND energy conservation could be false. Evolution doesn't rely on the principle of energy conservation to work. In fact, that it can work under the constraint of energy conservation is a bonus. Though I must congratulate you - it's refreshing to hear 'Evolution operates within the laws of thermodynamics' rather than 'Evolution requires breaking the laws of thermodynamics to work'.
Creation Science (or simply Creationism) is the freedom from unfair and blind demand to follow the conservation laws in physics. Thaumaturgy is like that. It can be invoked to explain anything and as such, explains nothing.
Spirituality, and divinity — is what can not be measured by Standard Instruments. For example: your love to mom has no physical temperature, has no physical pressure I see no reason it cannot be measured in principle. Hormone levels, neuronal excitement levels etc.
Actions of spiritual beings always violate the conservation laws of Nature. PROOF: spiritual being is not part of Nature. I don't see why, just because something is not part of nature, it must ALWAYS violate the conservation laws of nature. It could be possible that there any conservation laws that actually apply to both domains.
However, the behaviour of Nature under the influence of spiritual beings is describable by addition several terms (functions and fields) into the equations of Nature. For example, the Newton Second Law a m = F (the m is mass of body, the a is acceleration of body, F is physical force acting on body) can fully describe the levitation and telekinesis by addition of the force-field K (with no natural source). So, a m = F + K. F = ma is only true if you are using SI units, or performing appropriate conversions. Otherwise it's just F ∝ ma. Your K is not SI, indeed it represents a number that "can not be measured by Standard Instruments.", so you can just assert you can bungle it in the equation. But you are using it as if has the units of kg m/s2 - so all you need to do is measure, using standard instruments how much acceleration it provides a mass. Add to this problem, the slight issue that all measurements we have ever derived for K make K=0, and you may as well just leave it out of the equation.
The proof, that without the spiritual terms (like K) the mathematics of Academic Science is not self-consistent: Should be justified within this thread. A poorly written paper on researchgate is not going to fly here. I mean seriously, what kind of proof includes this:
quote: Anyway - you have not presented a compelling argument here. Would you like to try a second time?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Astronomy Junior Member (Idle past 2231 days) Posts: 25 Joined: |
YOU WROTE:
Spirituality, and divinity — is what can not be measured by Standard Instruments. For example: your love to mom has no physical temperature, has no physical pressure
I see no reason it cannot be measured in principle. Hormone levels, neuronal excitement levels etc.
Actions of spiritual beings always violate the conservation laws of Nature.
I don't see why, just because something is not part of nature, it must ALWAYS violate the conservation laws of nature. It could be possible that there any conservation laws that actually apply to both domains.PROOF: spiritual being is not part of Nature. MY REPLY:1. The influence on Nature, while you Love your Mom, can be measured (like looking at the photo, where you are giving your mom the flowers, simply count the number and determine the colour of the flowers), but the Love has no Natural Source! Because Love is not Biochemistry of our brain! 2. There are no natural conservation laws in Heaven. Because then there would be just Nature, not the Heaven. But atheism is nihilism. Nihilism is denial of Truth itself. Thus, Nihilism is not True. 3. Please reread the thread, because I have added something about Dark Matter. Edited by Astronomy, : Added clarification. Edited by Astronomy, : Improved the point.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AZPaul3 Member Posts: 8654 From: Phoenix Joined: Member Rating: 6.6
|
However, the behaviour of Nature under the influence of spiritual beings is describable by addition several terms (functions and fields) into the equations of Nature. For example, the Newton Second Law a m = F (the m is mass of body, the a is acceleration of body, F is physical force acting on body) can fully describe the levitation and telekinesis by addition of the force-field K (with no natural source). So, a m = F + K.
So, K is a unit-less vector quantity of unknown origin, unknown source. In physics this is called magic. Now we can do the experiments to determine some attributes of K. Problem 1 — Car driving on the road Measured mass m = 1500 kg (kilograms)Measured acceleration a = 1.6 m/s2 (meters per second squared) Measured force F = 2400 N (Newtons) am=F+K Substitute the known values in the equation and solve for K: (1.6 m/s2 )(1500 kg) = 2400 N + K(1.6 m/s2)(1500 kg) = (2400 kg m / s2) + K 2400 kg m / s2 = (2400 kg m / s2) + K (2400 kg m / s2) - (2400 kg m / s2) = K 0 = K Problem 2 — SUV recklessly speeding on the road Measured mass m = 5000 kg (kilograms)Measured acceleration a = 8.25 m/s2 (meters per second squared) Measured force F = 41,250 N (Newtons) Substitute the known values in the equation and solve for K: (8.25 m/s2 )(5000 kg) = 41,250 N + K(8.25 m/s2 )(5000 kg) = (41,250 kg m / s2) + K 41,250 kg m / s2 = (41,250 kg m / s2) + K (41,250 kg m / s2) - (41,250 kg m / s2) = K 0 = K Problem 2 — SUV falling over a cliff Measured mass m = 5000 kg (kilograms)Measured gravitational acceleration a = 9.81 m/s2 (meters per second squared) Measured force F = 49,050 N (Newtons) Substitute the known values in the equation and solve for K: (9.81 m/s2 )(5000 kg) = 49,050 N + K(9.81 m/s2 )(5000 kg) = (49,050 kg m / s2) + K 49,050 kg m / s2= (49,050 kg m / s2) + K (49,050 kg m / s2) - (49,050 kg m / s2) = K 0 = K Very good, Astronomy! You have just shown that your unit-less vector quantity of unknown origin and unknown source, your K, appears to be a universal constant of value 0. It appears there is no magic in this universe. Congratulations! I gotta phone this in. Anyone got the area code for Stockholm?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Astronomy Junior Member (Idle past 2231 days) Posts: 25 Joined: |
Please be more respective with representative of Academic Science. I am author in Physical Review.
The units of K is Newton: [K]=[N].
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AZPaul3 Member Posts: 8654 From: Phoenix Joined: Member Rating: 6.6 |
The units of K is Newton: [K]=[N]. So now we have: F + K = m a (kg m/s2) + (kg m/s2) = kg * m/s2 So you're saying that 2F=ma.
Please be more respective with representative of Academic Science. Earn it. and this BS is not the way.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tanypteryx Member Posts: 4597 From: Oregon, USA Joined: Member Rating: 9.1 |
Congratulations! I gotta phone this in. Anyone got the area code for Stockholm? I always say the nomination is the prize.What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Astronomy Junior Member (Idle past 2231 days) Posts: 25 Joined: |
I do not have to earn respect! I am already author in Physical Review.
The F+K is sum of Physics and Religion. Edited by Astronomy, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AZPaul3 Member Posts: 8654 From: Phoenix Joined: Member Rating: 6.6 |
The F+K is sum of Physics and Religion. And as shown, empirically, K=0. It is nothing. It has no effect.
I do not have to earn respect! I am already author in Physical Review. "Political language is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind. ― George Orwell
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Astronomy Junior Member (Idle past 2231 days) Posts: 25 Joined: |
The F+K is sum of Physics and Religion.
And as shown, empirically, K=0. It is nothing. It has no effect. The respectful mathematics in the link of the thread (link to researchgate) proves that K is not zero. Edited by AdminPhat, : fixed broken quote
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AZPaul3 Member Posts: 8654 From: Phoenix Joined: Member Rating: 6.6 |
The respectful mathematics in the link of the thread (link to researchgate) proves that K is not zero. Your paper is crap. All the twisted math in the universe of your mind is but bunk when it strains against the reality of repeated verified observation. Self-serving symbol manipulation, no matter how logically presented, does not trump reality. Your K is 0. Further, it is a conjured fake with no validity in the reality of observation. Spiritually inspired flat Earth ... my ass.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Modulous Member (Idle past 243 days) Posts: 7801 From: Manchester, UK Joined: |
but the Love has no Natural Source! Because Love is not Biochemistry of our brain! How did you reach this conclusion?
There are no natural conservation laws in Heaven. Because then there would be just Nature, not the Heaven There may be conservation laws in Heaven of course, and those laws may be what cause natural conservation laws to exist. You have no way of knowing either way. Additionally - there can be spiritual existence without Heaven.
3. Please reread the thread, because I have added something about Dark Matter. I see no evidence that Dark Matter does not have a natural source. Do you have something beyond your assertion on this?
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024