Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 64 (9045 total)
75 online now:
AdminPhat (Phat), AZPaul3, dwise1, PaulK, Percy (Admin), Tangle (6 members, 69 visitors)
Newest Member: maria
Upcoming Birthdays: AdminPhat
Post Volume: Total: 887,179 Year: 4,825/14,102 Month: 423/707 Week: 154/197 Day: 43/55 Hour: 2/5


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The roots of Creation Science and Darwinism
Taq
Member
Posts: 8488
Joined: 03-06-2009
Member Rating: 7.4


(1)
Message 44 of 89 (833207)
05-18-2018 12:54 PM
Reply to: Message 37 by ICANT
05-18-2018 4:06 AM


Re: Re-Dark Matter
ICANT writes:

That sound like religion to me.

It is interesting that you never hear a scientist trying to discredit religious beliefs by calling them science. However, you very often seen people with religious beliefs trying to discredit scientific theories by calling them religions. Says a lot about how they view their own religious beliefs.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 37 by ICANT, posted 05-18-2018 4:06 AM ICANT has not yet responded

  
Taq
Member
Posts: 8488
Joined: 03-06-2009
Member Rating: 7.4


(2)
Message 88 of 89 (833646)
05-24-2018 3:27 PM
Reply to: Message 84 by Phat
05-24-2018 10:09 AM


Re: Spirits or Spiritual Forces.
Phat writes:

Concerning Creation Science. How does it differ from mainstream science?

"By definition, no apparent, perceived or claimed evidence in any field, including history and chronology, can be valid if it contradicts the scriptural record."
https://answersingenesis.org/about/faith/

The lack of a null hypothesis, hence the lack of a testable hypothesis, is a rather glaring difference.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 84 by Phat, posted 05-24-2018 10:09 AM Phat has not yet responded

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2021