Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 85 (8984 total)
53 online now:
(53 visitors)
Newest Member: Jerry Johnson
Upcoming Birthdays: Diomedes
Post Volume: Total: 877,519 Year: 9,267/23,288 Month: 282/1,544 Week: 557/518 Day: 53/84 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Time Dilation, the Hubble Shift and God's Eternal Universe
Captcass
Member (Idle past 173 days)
Posts: 70
Joined: 06-07-2018


Message 16 of 189 (834860)
06-13-2018 10:31 PM
Reply to: Message 15 by Adminnemooseus
06-13-2018 9:55 PM


Re: How to do quote boxes
Thanks much! I am getting the notices now, too.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by Adminnemooseus, posted 06-13-2018 9:55 PM Adminnemooseus has acknowledged this reply

Captcass
Member (Idle past 173 days)
Posts: 70
Joined: 06-07-2018


Message 17 of 189 (862734)
09-11-2019 7:45 PM


Final Paper Has Been Published
The final version of my paper was published in the peer-reviewed Journal of Cosmology on 29 July 2019 and can be seen here in Vol. 26, #21, of the Journal:
http://journalofcosmology.com/...20as%20Causation%20JofC.pdf.

As far as I know this is the first paper to appear in a peer reviewed journal that originates the universe with an eternal Creator, or even mentions the Creator.


Replies to this message:
 Message 18 by AZPaul3, posted 09-11-2019 11:09 PM Captcass has responded

AZPaul3
Member
Posts: 5116
From: Phoenix
Joined: 11-06-2006
Member Rating: 3.1


(1)
Message 18 of 189 (862738)
09-11-2019 11:09 PM
Reply to: Message 17 by Captcass
09-11-2019 7:45 PM


Re: Final Paper Has Been Published
Your journal is a known fringe psudo-science rag with no effect or respect within the discipline.

I'm afraid your paper means nothing to the reality of this universe.

journal


Eschew obfuscation. Habituate elucidation.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by Captcass, posted 09-11-2019 7:45 PM Captcass has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 19 by Captcass, posted 09-11-2019 11:44 PM AZPaul3 has responded

Captcass
Member (Idle past 173 days)
Posts: 70
Joined: 06-07-2018


Message 19 of 189 (862742)
09-11-2019 11:44 PM
Reply to: Message 18 by AZPaul3
09-11-2019 11:09 PM


Re: Final Paper Has Been Published
Well, that is your opinion. The opinion of the mainstream knuckleheads who think the Big Bang singularity and an infinitely accelerating expansion of the universe are logical. The journal is certainly not mainstream, but the mainstream is idiotic

The journal publishes peer reviewed papers that explore the fringes of science and subjects and possible models the other, "mainstream" journals will not touch. Things peers believe are worth consideration.

Name a single journal that has published a single paper that even mentions the Creator. Not "mainstream", right? So what the hell are YOU doing here? NONE of your other journals will EVER even mention the Creator....

So...take your attitude and .... Don't bother replying to this, as I do not engage with lost, bitter, hate filled people like you. You need manners and decency to speak with me.

Unpublished Trolls like you belong under bridges...


This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by AZPaul3, posted 09-11-2019 11:09 PM AZPaul3 has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 20 by AZPaul3, posted 09-12-2019 12:12 AM Captcass has not yet responded

AZPaul3
Member
Posts: 5116
From: Phoenix
Joined: 11-06-2006
Member Rating: 3.1


(1)
Message 20 of 189 (862743)
09-12-2019 12:12 AM
Reply to: Message 19 by Captcass
09-11-2019 11:44 PM


Re: Final Paper Has Been Published
So...take your attitude and .... Don't bother replying to this, as I do not engage with lost, bitter, hate filled people like you. You need manners and decency to speak with me.

Your deflection does not alter the reality.

Not just me ... I am nothing. The rest of this community and the discipline at large, however, know this journal, and now you, for the pseudo-science you both practice.


Eschew obfuscation. Habituate elucidation.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by Captcass, posted 09-11-2019 11:44 PM Captcass has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 21 by Tanypteryx, posted 09-12-2019 12:20 AM AZPaul3 has acknowledged this reply

Tanypteryx
Member
Posts: 2371
From: Oregon, USA
Joined: 08-27-2006
Member Rating: 3.4


(1)
Message 21 of 189 (862744)
09-12-2019 12:20 AM
Reply to: Message 20 by AZPaul3
09-12-2019 12:12 AM


Re: Final Paper Has Been Published
It's not just the pseudoscience, they clearly do not understand the purpose of peer review.

What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python

One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie

If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy

The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq


This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by AZPaul3, posted 09-12-2019 12:12 AM AZPaul3 has acknowledged this reply

Replies to this message:
 Message 22 by Captcass, posted 09-12-2019 12:41 AM Tanypteryx has responded

Captcass
Member (Idle past 173 days)
Posts: 70
Joined: 06-07-2018


Message 22 of 189 (862747)
09-12-2019 12:41 AM
Reply to: Message 21 by Tanypteryx
09-12-2019 12:20 AM


Re: Final Paper Has Been Published
Trouble with you, and AZPaul3, is that you don't know enough to debate the paper, so you attack the journal that took over a year to review it before publishing it. You are bitter people.....

You embrace "peer reviewed" journals of idiots reviewing idiots who believe in Godless singularities and infinite accelerating expansions of the universe. Total rubbish of "Dark" this and "Dark" that. No TRUTHS, just idiotic THEORIES that you ACCEPT as somehow being "true" because the "mainstream peer-reviewed' journals support them, even though no one EVER proves anything! They, and you, just want EVERYTHING to "fit" GR.

I mean, if Einstein couldn't explain what Hubble saw, and just gave up trying to complete GR and went off looking for a unified field theory, then.... ??????
Just WHO are the DUPES here?

What if it is the "mainstream" journals that have been publishing an endless stream of totally unproven THEORIES for the last 100 years since Hubble that are "lost"? Sure seems to me they are getting nowhere.... Offer no proofs.... Just keep looking for "Dark" answers to "make things fit" the notion that Hubble saw receding objects, and not just "tired" time, so to speak.....

They looked at "tired light", and rightly rejected it, but never even considered "tired" time. (I am using that phrase, "tired time", for the first time here and am giving copyright notice here and now.)

Again, what are you Godless folks doing here? Do you REALLY believe that idiocy? How does the Creator fit into anything you think is right?

Have you read the paper I only just now provided a link to? Or are you just out to put people down here?

Shame on the two of you for your ....., ....., ...., thoughts and comments.

I am not here for that. If you want to discuss my model, I am happy to oblige. I would like to be able to tell you of the implications of the paper in the faith aspects that they had me edit from the final journal version, or that i did not include because I knew they could not accept them.

The word "faith", for instance, is akin to "UFO" in science journals. Peer reviewed journals will not accept anything with Either term. The JofC has no "religious" terminology or the word "UFO".

Otherwise, just shame on you for turning your backs on the first and only paper to be published in a peer-reviewed journal that originates the universe with the eternal Creator, instead of investigating and pursuing that possibility....

No reviewer was able to provide a demonstrable flaw and no one has even tried to comment past me in over 15K views in two science forum threads in nearly a year.

Let me know if you read the paper. I am going to bed....

Edited by Captcass, : Incomplete reply


This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by Tanypteryx, posted 09-12-2019 12:20 AM Tanypteryx has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 23 by Tanypteryx, posted 09-12-2019 1:24 AM Captcass has responded

Tanypteryx
Member
Posts: 2371
From: Oregon, USA
Joined: 08-27-2006
Member Rating: 3.4


(1)
Message 23 of 189 (862748)
09-12-2019 1:24 AM
Reply to: Message 22 by Captcass
09-12-2019 12:41 AM


Re: Final Paper Has Been Published
You seem to be the one filled with hate. You have nothing I envy. And I've published in journals that had real peer review. If you want to do science then you have to actually do science.

Sorry you didn't get the reception you were hoping for...


What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python

One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie

If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy

The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq


This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by Captcass, posted 09-12-2019 12:41 AM Captcass has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 24 by Captcass, posted 09-12-2019 2:08 AM Tanypteryx has responded

Captcass
Member (Idle past 173 days)
Posts: 70
Joined: 06-07-2018


Message 24 of 189 (862749)
09-12-2019 2:08 AM
Reply to: Message 23 by Tanypteryx
09-12-2019 1:24 AM


Re: Final Paper Has Been Published
Sorry. Again. mainstream is lamestream. No progress in over 100 years because you do not understand what you are seeing. Please read the paper and stop being nasty.

I expect all welcomes to be warm, especially on so-called spiritual sites. Shame. You would not address me so face to face if I stood at your front door.

You said, "If you want to do science then you have to actually do science."

Trouble is, to you, "science" means "accepting ridiculous theories for truth". You are equating your idiotic theories to the "truth", i.e., "science". The 2 do not equate.

Edited by Captcass, : No reason given.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by Tanypteryx, posted 09-12-2019 1:24 AM Tanypteryx has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 25 by Tanypteryx, posted 09-12-2019 2:25 AM Captcass has responded
 Message 39 by vimesey, posted 09-12-2019 4:42 PM Captcass has not yet responded
 Message 44 by Tanypteryx, posted 09-12-2019 9:16 PM Captcass has not yet responded

Tanypteryx
Member
Posts: 2371
From: Oregon, USA
Joined: 08-27-2006
Member Rating: 3.4


(1)
Message 25 of 189 (862750)
09-12-2019 2:25 AM
Reply to: Message 24 by Captcass
09-12-2019 2:08 AM


Re: Final Paper Has Been Published
Well, this is not a spiritual site, so-called or otherwise.

I read your paper. If you can't take criticisms, boohoo.


What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python

One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie

If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy

The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq


This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by Captcass, posted 09-12-2019 2:08 AM Captcass has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 26 by Captcass, posted 09-12-2019 2:36 AM Tanypteryx has not yet responded

Captcass
Member (Idle past 173 days)
Posts: 70
Joined: 06-07-2018


Message 26 of 189 (862751)
09-12-2019 2:36 AM
Reply to: Message 25 by Tanypteryx
09-12-2019 2:25 AM


Re: Final Paper Has Been Published
Demonstrate how it is wrong and explain how you could possibly read it so quickly. I can demonstrate your theories are wrong right here. What preceded the the singularity and what is outside the singularity and from what inertial frame of reference is that view? Where is the universe infinitely accelerating into? Why doesn't GR work everywhere?

Never mind, I know, there are "DARK" reasons! LOL.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by Tanypteryx, posted 09-12-2019 2:25 AM Tanypteryx has not yet responded

ringo
Member
Posts: 18308
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005
Member Rating: 1.8


(3)
Message 27 of 189 (862753)
09-12-2019 11:47 AM
Reply to: Message 10 by Captcass
06-13-2018 5:51 PM


Re: Who?
Captcass writes:

I have known the truth since I was 24. I am 68 now.


One thing you should have learned in 68 years: Nobody knows "the truth" at 24.

“Maturity, one discovers, has everything to do with the acceptance of ‘not knowing.”
-- Mark Z. Danielewski, House of Leaves

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by Captcass, posted 06-13-2018 5:51 PM Captcass has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 28 by 1.61803, posted 09-12-2019 12:09 PM ringo has acknowledged this reply
 Message 29 by Captcass, posted 09-12-2019 12:53 PM ringo has responded

1.61803
Member (Idle past 51 days)
Posts: 2928
From: Lone Star State USA
Joined: 02-19-2004


Message 28 of 189 (862754)
09-12-2019 12:09 PM
Reply to: Message 27 by ringo
09-12-2019 11:47 AM


Re: Who?
I agree it took Siddhartha until age 35!

"You were not there for the beginning. You will not be there for the end. Your knowledge of what is going on can only be superficial and relative" William S. Burroughs

This message is a reply to:
 Message 27 by ringo, posted 09-12-2019 11:47 AM ringo has acknowledged this reply

Captcass
Member (Idle past 173 days)
Posts: 70
Joined: 06-07-2018


Message 29 of 189 (862755)
09-12-2019 12:53 PM
Reply to: Message 27 by ringo
09-12-2019 11:47 AM


Re: Who?
I learned to wash my hands in acid under a Muslim Haj in Djakarta when I was 22. His teacher could walk on water. What were you doing at age 22? It took me 2 more years and much study of many things before I had my epiphany at age 24. It has then taken me this long to explain it in terms of accepted science.

It seems I mistook this forum for being a spiritual debate as it is, after all, E v C.

So. unless anyone wants to discuss my model and its implications, I'll bow out. I have no interest here otherwise.
Tks


This message is a reply to:
 Message 27 by ringo, posted 09-12-2019 11:47 AM ringo has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 30 by ringo, posted 09-12-2019 1:06 PM Captcass has not yet responded
 Message 32 by jar, posted 09-12-2019 1:35 PM Captcass has not yet responded
 Message 33 by Theodoric, posted 09-12-2019 1:38 PM Captcass has responded

ringo
Member
Posts: 18308
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005
Member Rating: 1.8


(3)
Message 30 of 189 (862756)
09-12-2019 1:06 PM
Reply to: Message 29 by Captcass
09-12-2019 12:53 PM


Re: Who?
Captcass writes:

It has then taken me this long to explain it in terms of accepted science.


I thought you said accepted science was for idiots ("the mainstream is idiotic" Message 19).

Captcass writes:

It seems I mistook this forum for being a spiritual debate as it is, after all, E v C.


You did mistake it. E v C is about stamping out creationism - and other pseudoscience. It's mostly a scientific debate, not a spiritual one, though we do find that the "spiritual" people are wrong about a lot of other things too.

“Maturity, one discovers, has everything to do with the acceptance of ‘not knowing.”
-- Mark Z. Danielewski, House of Leaves

This message is a reply to:
 Message 29 by Captcass, posted 09-12-2019 12:53 PM Captcass has not yet responded

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2020