Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,817 Year: 3,074/9,624 Month: 919/1,588 Week: 102/223 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Motley Flood Thread (formerly Historical Science Mystification of Public)
jar
Member (Idle past 394 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 488 of 877 (834643)
06-09-2018 10:30 AM
Reply to: Message 482 by Faith
06-09-2018 8:39 AM


Re: one fault line stream tributary vs meandering canyon
Faith writes:
Perhaps it's you who misjudge the Word of God as an "ancient myth." If it ever hits you what it really is you may find yourself riveted to the floor in amazement as I did when I first discovered that God is real and no myth.
And so it gets admitted; you are simply spouting the nonsense dogma of your Cult rather than honestly pointing to what the Bible actually says or what the evidence actually shows.
You are just making shit up and doing it poorly. You never explain how your flood does anything and you keep adding in stuff that simply is not in either Biblical flood myth like mountains rising and earthquakes and continents splitting and oceans opening and still never address the problems with your fantasies.
How did the flood deposit material under already existing material without disturbing the older layer?
Faith, you keep making assertions that the flood did things but never explain how the flood did those things.
FACT: There are stone age sites all over the world and even pre-stone age sites.
FACT: Those sites existed before the flood is claimed to have happened.
FACT: None of those layers are more than a few tens of meters below the current surface.
FACT: All of those sites were are ground/surface level.
FACT: The evidence shows the site was at ground level at the time it was created by leaving evidence like fire pits and food remains and personal objects and man made objects.
FACT: All of those sites were buried by known observable processes.
Question: How could your flood deposit any material under an already existing layer without disturbing it?
Do you have anything to offer other than the bald silly assertion that the dates are wrong?

My Sister's Website: Rose Hill Studios My Website: My Website

This message is a reply to:
 Message 482 by Faith, posted 06-09-2018 8:39 AM Faith has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 494 by edge, posted 06-09-2018 11:43 AM jar has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 394 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 700 of 877 (835137)
06-18-2018 1:05 PM
Reply to: Message 695 by Faith
06-18-2018 9:08 AM


Faith shows she does not understand even the rules
Faith writes:
Nonsense. You forget I've excepted angular unconformities.
You forget the rules. You cannot make exceptions. One single example that cannot be explained by the flood refutes the flood and makes it trash.

My Sister's Website: Rose Hill Studios My Website: My Website

This message is a reply to:
 Message 695 by Faith, posted 06-18-2018 9:08 AM Faith has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 394 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 730 of 877 (835205)
06-19-2018 3:40 PM
Reply to: Message 729 by Faith
06-19-2018 3:32 PM


Re: subjective interpretation
Of course we know what the pre-flood world was like since there is ample evidence of even what the pre-Eden world was like.
Faith you are simply posting utter nonsense. We have casts and fossils and pollen and lots and lots of evidence where all you have is the dogma of your Cult.
Edited by jar, : No reason given.

My Sister's Website: Rose Hill Studios My Website: My Website

This message is a reply to:
 Message 729 by Faith, posted 06-19-2018 3:32 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 733 by Faith, posted 06-19-2018 3:51 PM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 394 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 735 of 877 (835210)
06-19-2018 4:09 PM
Reply to: Message 733 by Faith
06-19-2018 3:51 PM


evidence based reasoning
And fossils and trees and fossil rain drops and air samples and water samples.
Faith, the evidence that there was never a Biblical Flood or Fall and that the Earth is old is absolutely conclusive and overwhelming.

My Sister's Website: Rose Hill Studios My Website: My Website

This message is a reply to:
 Message 733 by Faith, posted 06-19-2018 3:51 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 743 by Faith, posted 06-19-2018 9:12 PM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 394 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 748 of 877 (835230)
06-20-2018 4:05 AM
Reply to: Message 743 by Faith
06-19-2018 9:12 PM


Re: evidence based reasoning
Bullshit Faith.
None of the things I mentioned are eplained by any flood model and you simply continuing to repeat utter falsehoods.
No flood model explains the sorting found in reality.

My Sister's Website: Rose Hill Studios My Website: My Website

This message is a reply to:
 Message 743 by Faith, posted 06-19-2018 9:12 PM Faith has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 394 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


(1)
Message 763 of 877 (835250)
06-20-2018 11:45 AM
Reply to: Message 762 by Percy
06-20-2018 9:55 AM


Re: subjective interpretation
'tis the Myth of Sisyphus made fact.

My Sister's Website: Rose Hill Studios My Website: My Website

This message is a reply to:
 Message 762 by Percy, posted 06-20-2018 9:55 AM Percy has seen this message but not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 394 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 812 of 877 (835421)
06-23-2018 12:42 PM
Reply to: Message 811 by Faith
06-23-2018 12:29 PM


Re: Tectonic bashing and crashing
The initial list:
  1. The Landscape seen in this image:
  2. Capitan Reef
  3. Layered salt deposits separated by sediment layers
  4. The cross bedding seen in this picture
  5. The White Cliffs of Dover
  6. This fossil sand dune seen in this image:
  7. Half Dome:
  8. Banded Ironstone:
  9. Layered Erratic Rocks:
  10. The Layered Chalk Beds of Kansas:
Still waiting for the explanation of how the Flood created any of these facts.
Reality ALWAYS trumps dogma and fantasy.

My Sister's Website: Rose Hill Studios My Website: My Website

This message is a reply to:
 Message 811 by Faith, posted 06-23-2018 12:29 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 813 by Faith, posted 06-23-2018 12:52 PM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 394 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 823 of 877 (835443)
06-23-2018 2:27 PM
Reply to: Message 813 by Faith
06-23-2018 12:52 PM


Re: Tectonic bashing and crashing
Then explain the most obvious model, method, mechanism, process or procedure your flood used to create each item; or as usual, simply run way.

My Sister's Website: Rose Hill Studios My Website: My Website

This message is a reply to:
 Message 813 by Faith, posted 06-23-2018 12:52 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 824 by Faith, posted 06-23-2018 2:34 PM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 394 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 825 of 877 (835445)
06-23-2018 2:36 PM
Reply to: Message 824 by Faith
06-23-2018 2:34 PM


Re: Tectonic bashing and crashing
That is still no explanation as expected. How did the flood do each single example?

My Sister's Website: Rose Hill Studios My Website: My Website

This message is a reply to:
 Message 824 by Faith, posted 06-23-2018 2:34 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 826 by Faith, posted 06-23-2018 2:45 PM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 394 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 827 of 877 (835449)
06-23-2018 2:49 PM
Reply to: Message 826 by Faith
06-23-2018 2:45 PM


Re: Tectonic bashing and crashing
But you have not explained how your flood laid down the strata as expected. For example the first one is wind born cross bedded sand dunes. How did your flood produce wind blown cross bedded sand dunes?
Edited by jar, : appalin spallin

My Sister's Website: Rose Hill Studios My Website: My Website

This message is a reply to:
 Message 826 by Faith, posted 06-23-2018 2:45 PM Faith has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 394 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 835 of 877 (835480)
06-23-2018 7:54 PM
Reply to: Message 826 by Faith
06-23-2018 2:45 PM


How did the flood lay down wind blown sand dunes?
How did the flood lay down wind blown cross bedded sand dunes?
Once you admit that the flood could not lay down cross bedded wind blown sand dunes we can move on to the next thing that was impossible for the flood.

My Sister's Website: Rose Hill Studios My Website: My Website

This message is a reply to:
 Message 826 by Faith, posted 06-23-2018 2:45 PM Faith has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 394 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 854 of 877 (835508)
06-24-2018 7:38 AM


How did the flood produce wind blown cross bedded sand dunes
How did the flood produce wind blown cross bedded sand dunes?

My Sister's Website: Rose Hill Studios My Website: My Website

Replies to this message:
 Message 856 by Faith, posted 06-24-2018 8:23 AM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 394 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 867 of 877 (835524)
06-24-2018 9:24 AM
Reply to: Message 856 by Faith
06-24-2018 8:23 AM


Re: How did the flood produce wind blown cross bedded sand dunes
So absolutely no response other than denial and more dishonesty it seems.
Yet the reality is that they are wind bown sand dunes and we can see the same thing happening today.
Your continual denial of reality does not strengthen your unsupported assertions.

My Sister's Website: Rose Hill Studios My Website: My Website

This message is a reply to:
 Message 856 by Faith, posted 06-24-2018 8:23 AM Faith has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 394 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 873 of 877 (835535)
06-24-2018 10:41 AM


The Biblical Flood never happened!
The only support offered in this thread for the possibility of a Biblical Flood has been misrepresentation, dishonesty, denial of reality and utter failure to address any of the evidence that has be presented.
The idea that there was ever a Biblical Flood deserves nothing more than ridicule and laughter; and of course, pity for the willfully ignorant that support such nonsense..

My Sister's Website: Rose Hill Studios My Website: My Website

Replies to this message:
 Message 874 by Phat, posted 06-24-2018 10:49 AM jar has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024