|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1444 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Motley Flood Thread (formerly Historical Science Mystification of Public) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 394 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Faith writes: Perhaps it's you who misjudge the Word of God as an "ancient myth." If it ever hits you what it really is you may find yourself riveted to the floor in amazement as I did when I first discovered that God is real and no myth. And so it gets admitted; you are simply spouting the nonsense dogma of your Cult rather than honestly pointing to what the Bible actually says or what the evidence actually shows. You are just making shit up and doing it poorly. You never explain how your flood does anything and you keep adding in stuff that simply is not in either Biblical flood myth like mountains rising and earthquakes and continents splitting and oceans opening and still never address the problems with your fantasies. How did the flood deposit material under already existing material without disturbing the older layer? Faith, you keep making assertions that the flood did things but never explain how the flood did those things. FACT: There are stone age sites all over the world and even pre-stone age sites. FACT: Those sites existed before the flood is claimed to have happened. FACT: None of those layers are more than a few tens of meters below the current surface. FACT: All of those sites were are ground/surface level. FACT: The evidence shows the site was at ground level at the time it was created by leaving evidence like fire pits and food remains and personal objects and man made objects. FACT: All of those sites were buried by known observable processes. Question: How could your flood deposit any material under an already existing layer without disturbing it? Do you have anything to offer other than the bald silly assertion that the dates are wrong?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 394 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Faith writes: Nonsense. You forget I've excepted angular unconformities. You forget the rules. You cannot make exceptions. One single example that cannot be explained by the flood refutes the flood and makes it trash.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 394 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Of course we know what the pre-flood world was like since there is ample evidence of even what the pre-Eden world was like.
Faith you are simply posting utter nonsense. We have casts and fossils and pollen and lots and lots of evidence where all you have is the dogma of your Cult. Edited by jar, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 394 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
And fossils and trees and fossil rain drops and air samples and water samples.
Faith, the evidence that there was never a Biblical Flood or Fall and that the Earth is old is absolutely conclusive and overwhelming.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 394 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Bullshit Faith.
None of the things I mentioned are eplained by any flood model and you simply continuing to repeat utter falsehoods. No flood model explains the sorting found in reality.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 394 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined:
|
'tis the Myth of Sisyphus made fact.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 394 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
The initial list:
Still waiting for the explanation of how the Flood created any of these facts. Reality ALWAYS trumps dogma and fantasy.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 394 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Then explain the most obvious model, method, mechanism, process or procedure your flood used to create each item; or as usual, simply run way.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 394 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
That is still no explanation as expected. How did the flood do each single example?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 394 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
But you have not explained how your flood laid down the strata as expected. For example the first one is wind born cross bedded sand dunes. How did your flood produce wind blown cross bedded sand dunes?
Edited by jar, : appalin spallin
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 394 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
How did the flood lay down wind blown cross bedded sand dunes?
Once you admit that the flood could not lay down cross bedded wind blown sand dunes we can move on to the next thing that was impossible for the flood.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 394 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
How did the flood produce wind blown cross bedded sand dunes?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 394 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
So absolutely no response other than denial and more dishonesty it seems.
Yet the reality is that they are wind bown sand dunes and we can see the same thing happening today. Your continual denial of reality does not strengthen your unsupported assertions.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 394 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
The only support offered in this thread for the possibility of a Biblical Flood has been misrepresentation, dishonesty, denial of reality and utter failure to address any of the evidence that has be presented.
The idea that there was ever a Biblical Flood deserves nothing more than ridicule and laughter; and of course, pity for the willfully ignorant that support such nonsense..
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024