quote:
Originally posted by horsegal243:
The theory of evolution is not really a theory at all. In order to have a theory you must devlop a hypothesis. In order for that hypothesis to become a theory you must test it over and over to get results. Scienctists have never tested the hypothesis of evolution and gotten the results that they are claiming. So really and truly it is the HYPOTHISES of evolution not the THEORY of evoluion because they have no proof of their idea.
read it and weep evoluionists
I know that many folks here will do a better job of debating and explaining the specific claims on this one than I, so I will take a different approach.
So, are you a scientist? Had a lot of training and instruction in the sciences? Maybe you are just a lay-student, self educated in the philosophy of science, having read Popper, et. al.?
No?
Well, it always strikes me as incredible that Creationists, who seem to me to often be utterly uninformed about the subjects they are discussing, so very frequently think they are presenting some kind of devastating critique to science when they say something silly like the above statement. I mean, don't you think that scientists would have figured this out a long time ago?
It's kind of like saying to an engineer who designs automobile motors, "you know, you simply CAN'T have a machine that works on setting gasoline on fire! It will explode! So, the internal combustion engine isn't possible. See?"
Here is a good description of what science is. Please explain, with SPECIFICS, how the ToE doesn't meet these requirements:
http://www.skepdic.com/science.html
------------------
"We will still have perfect freedom to hold contrary views of our own, but to simply
close our minds to the knowledge painstakingly accumulated by hundreds of thousands
of scientists over long centuries is to deliberately decide to be ignorant and narrow-
minded."
-Steve Allen, from "Dumbth"