Creation

You said, "We define it as infinite or unending." Doesn't "we" include you?And the dictionary defines eternity as infinite or unending time. I thought you said that time doesn't exist.But clearly you don't see the irony. I was making a joke about trying to define something that is, "by definition", indefinite.

What does that have to do with what I said?

Hi ringo, Didn't you ask about God's use of words?God Bless,

Hi ringo, That is correct. Time does not exist. There is existence. There are events that take place in that existence. There is existence between those events. The duration of that existence is what we measure with our concept of time.Since you have time confused with existence I don't expect you to understand what I have said. You want to take time and measure time with it.God Bless,

I asked what God has to do with our definitions of words.

Existence is not a thing; it's a property of things. Like red is not a thing. You can't have a big bag of red. Red might be a property of what's in the bag but red itself is not a thing. And you can not have a bag of existence. What you have in the bag may or may not have the property of existence - it may or may not exist - but you can't say it "is" existence. Since you have existence confused with things that exist, I don't expect you to make any sense. Well, that's how we measure anything. We measure distance with distance, comparing an unknown distance - e.g. the length of a two-by-four - with a known distance - e.g. the length of a yardstick. We measure an unknown time with a known time - e.g. the period of a pendulum's swing.

You cannot say duration (the way time exists and is woven with space) is the same everywhere in the universe, sorry. Prove it.As for your claim there is no time..ha.I don't think you know what time is, and cannot wave it away as being merely a construct of the mind of man. How long does it take for a squirrel to cross a road or a bird to migrate? Time is not a figment or creation of our mind it is real.

Speak for yourself when you say 'we' define....not everyone accepts your religious definition attempts.

Whatever some Hebrews may have thought to try and envision what God said about the universe is of no great import.There was water out beyond where the stars are. That water came via some sort of window of heaven to earth, many feel. God's science is so far above man's it is ridiculous.

If Adam were to have split an atom, it would have likely involved more than current science is aware of.The way God's voice works on atoms and makes them behave, is beyond manscience.How the spiritual interacts with atoms is not known by science. How atoms may interact with the spiritual and some different time and space and whatever else we don't know about that may be out there, science doesn't know.In the origin issues debate we must ask...what the heck DO they know!?

I'm only speaking for those of "us" who do. If you want to make up your own definitions, "we" can't stop you, but don' t expect to be taken seriously either.

"The second is the duration of 9 192 631 770 periods of the radiation corresponding to the transition between the two hyperfine levels of the ground state of the cesium 133 atom."
International System of Units from NISTYou are simply wrong on this point.You also have the problem of entropy. If time didn't exist then entropy would not exist. If entropy doesn't exist then biochemistry stops working. According to your own claims you shouldn't be alive right now. Atomic clocks are not kept in sync with anything. They tick at a specific rate because of the most basic physical laws, not because the Earth has a specific rotational velocity.

The creationists say it is, so you can argue with them.

So far, you haven't demonstrated that you know anything. Pick a topic and stick to it.

How about creation? That is the topic after all. I am telling you that science cannot begin to cover it. Yet they make belligerent origin claims. That is criminally insane.