Creation

Because that's how the water cycle works Yeh, we call those oceans and seas and the are at the end of the river's journey not at its source. Cobblers.

I asked you for book, chapter and verse.

And there is nothing in Genesis to suggest that there wasn't. It does NOT say that all of the land was in one place.And we know from reality that all of the land is NOT in one place.

I'm just curious, can you show a case where a large river flows into 4 smaller rivers?

I just feel like rambling on this side-topic: Absolutely.
Time and length (or width or height) are very much treated the same by humans. Both are real aspects of reality - not only concepts or ideas invented by humans:Time - as things change in time we can identify differences - basic time changes can be identified: eg. - "slower" or "faster"
Length - as things change in length we can identify differences - basic length changes can be identified: eg. - "shorter" or "longer" Both can be measured:Time - taking a known amount of time (a repeatable oscillation) we can measure how many of these oscillations it takes for a previously-unknown time and create a basis for comparison
Length - taking a known amount of length (a repeatable rod) we can measure how many of these rods it takes for a previously-unknown length and create a basis for comparison Humans have invented concepts to standardize measurements:Time - The second is the duration of 9 192 631 770 periods of the radiation corresponding to the transition between the two hyperfine levels of the ground state of the cesium 133 atom. Other made up unit examples: Hours, days, years, fortnights, trimester...
Length - The meter is the length of the path traveled by light in vacuum during a time interval of 1/299 792 458 of a second. Other made up unit examples: Kilometer, mile, foot, league, parsec... Both cause issues when taking specific-contexts from day-to-day life and thinking of them as absolutes in all contextsTime - There is no absolute-standard "day" in a sun-up/sun-down sense... for many reasons. Large ones include the sun not rising/setting the same around the world or the difficulty in identifying when you see/don't-see the sun - were you a second off? hundredths of a second off? millionths?
Length - There is no absolute-standard "8 foot" long 2x4... for many reasons. Large ones include the inability of wood to be "perfectly straight" or the problem that upon microscopic-inspection... there is no definitive "end" of the wood. Just a dense collection of wood-atoms, and a not-so-dense collection as you move further along - varying greatly at different areas of the face-of-the-end of the 2x4.Both these terms are great and very useful for understood-contextualized conversations.
Both these terms fall apart very quickly when attempting to identify any sort of absolute-standard. The concepts don't exist for either aspect of realityTime - You cannot touch "a minute," but you certainly can touch "a minute of running water."
Length - You cannot touch "5 feet," but you certainly can touch "5 feet of wood."Apologies for bringing up the old side-discussion.
It's just been in my mind for a bit - the idea that "Time" and "Length" are treated equally by humans as real things that both exist as part of our reality - but with human-invented-conceptual-measurement-standards surrounding our ability to identify them.I agree with ringo - To say or imply that length is real, but time is only a human-invented-concept is to misunderstand both.

Hi ringo Who said it wasn't scattered all over the place. The earth was divided in the days of Peleg.Do you contend that there was never a time when there was one land mass?Pangaea comes to my mind.God Bless,

Hi Stile, What or who determines what an inch is? or a foot? or a yard?Who determines the length of a second?God Bless,

Lifespans changed greatly look it up. Spirits no longer marry women and have babies on earth. Look it up. If you send a bird to find a tree someplace there are no trees, and a week later it returns with evidence of a new tree...that is fast growth. Look it up.

Maybe what you said does not mean one place. However since the one place was a bible quote, one supposes that could mean one place.

So to you, anything that works any other way than it does in the present nature is magic. OK.

You claimed windows of heaven are fairy tales. Like you know? Ha.As for upheaval, we see that in the world so it had to have happened sometime. Many feel that mountains before the flood were smaller. So the real high ones had to get here somehow, sometime.The bible doesn't say when. Looking at other big changes though, we can see that a lot of changes happened right after the flood period.Another way to cross check this in the bile is to look at the future. I would say that the future, not the present is the key to the past in the bible!Every island shall flee away and every mountain shall be made low, and a great quake will level all mountains and all skyscrapers (towers) on earth.One good fit for this would be a rapid returning to the way it was in the past!!Edited by creation, : No reason given.

Not exactly no. That was sarcasm.You see, to me an adult that talks this kind of irrational, childish drivel has been badly let down by their parents, the evil bastards of whatever deranged religious organisation that pedals this mindrot, the education system and the society that allows it..So it's not totally your own fault, but you're not doing much to help yourself. You need to try thinking for yourself a bit, if you can.

Still confusing the units we chose (arbitrarily) with what is being measured.The map is not the territory. Edited by JonF, : No reason given.

So your claim was sarcasm, and you don't actually thin the current physics/nature we see is indicative of the future or past? Spit it out.

What I think - know - is that the more you spout nonsense, the more you refuse to understand the need for evidence to support the nonsense, the more you troll with your one line responses (though I note you've actually made a bit more of an effort in a last couple of posts), the more you invent and ad hoc, the more you look like the archetypal loonytunes fundamentalist.I suppose you think your 'arguments' are impressive but it's only to yourself. If you actually want to make progress instead of making a fool of yourself you need to bring some actual facts, rationality and logic into your posts.